An evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in research studies requires the exclusion of subjects with medical and psychiatric conditions that could confound the analysis and interpretation of results. This study compares illnes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Unger Elizabeth R, Nater Urs M, Boneva Roumiana S, Maloney Elizabeth M, Lin Jin-Mann S, Jones James F, Reeves William C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-10-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/7/57
id doaj-e22c32a7c73d4f3aaa678ad91059081d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e22c32a7c73d4f3aaa678ad91059081d2020-11-25T00:54:43ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152009-10-01715710.1186/1741-7015-7-57An evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndromeUnger Elizabeth RNater Urs MBoneva Roumiana SMaloney Elizabeth MLin Jin-Mann SJones James FReeves William C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in research studies requires the exclusion of subjects with medical and psychiatric conditions that could confound the analysis and interpretation of results. This study compares illness parameters between individuals with CFS who have and those who do not have exclusionary conditions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used a population-based telephone survey of randomly selected individuals, followed by a clinical evaluation in the study metropolitan, urban, and rural counties of Georgia, USA. The medical and psychiatric histories of the subjects were examined and they underwent physical and psychiatric examinations and laboratory screening. We also employed the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI), the medical outcomes survey short form-36 (SF-36) and the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention symptom inventory (SI).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty-nine percent (1,609) of the 5623 subjects who completed the detailed telephone interview reported exclusionary diagnoses and we diagnosed an exclusionary condition in 36% of 781 clinically evaluated subjects. Both medical and psychiatric exclusionary conditions were more common in women, blacks and participants from rural areas. Subjects with and without exclusions had similar levels of fatigue and impairment as measured by the MFI and SF-36; those with CFS-like illness (not meeting the formal CFS definition) were more likely to have an exclusionary diagnosis. After adjusting for demographics, body mass index, fatigue subscales, SF-36 subscales and CFS symptoms, CFS-like illness did not remain significantly associated with having an exclusionary diagnosis.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Medical and psychiatric illnesses associated with fatigue are common among the unwell. Those who fulfill CFS-like criteria need to be evaluated for potentially treatable conditions. Those with exclusionary conditions are equally impaired as those without exclusions.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/7/57
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Unger Elizabeth R
Nater Urs M
Boneva Roumiana S
Maloney Elizabeth M
Lin Jin-Mann S
Jones James F
Reeves William C
spellingShingle Unger Elizabeth R
Nater Urs M
Boneva Roumiana S
Maloney Elizabeth M
Lin Jin-Mann S
Jones James F
Reeves William C
An evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome
BMC Medicine
author_facet Unger Elizabeth R
Nater Urs M
Boneva Roumiana S
Maloney Elizabeth M
Lin Jin-Mann S
Jones James F
Reeves William C
author_sort Unger Elizabeth R
title An evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome
title_short An evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome
title_full An evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome
title_fullStr An evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome
title_sort evaluation of exclusionary medical/psychiatric conditions in the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome
publisher BMC
series BMC Medicine
issn 1741-7015
publishDate 2009-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in research studies requires the exclusion of subjects with medical and psychiatric conditions that could confound the analysis and interpretation of results. This study compares illness parameters between individuals with CFS who have and those who do not have exclusionary conditions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used a population-based telephone survey of randomly selected individuals, followed by a clinical evaluation in the study metropolitan, urban, and rural counties of Georgia, USA. The medical and psychiatric histories of the subjects were examined and they underwent physical and psychiatric examinations and laboratory screening. We also employed the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI), the medical outcomes survey short form-36 (SF-36) and the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention symptom inventory (SI).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty-nine percent (1,609) of the 5623 subjects who completed the detailed telephone interview reported exclusionary diagnoses and we diagnosed an exclusionary condition in 36% of 781 clinically evaluated subjects. Both medical and psychiatric exclusionary conditions were more common in women, blacks and participants from rural areas. Subjects with and without exclusions had similar levels of fatigue and impairment as measured by the MFI and SF-36; those with CFS-like illness (not meeting the formal CFS definition) were more likely to have an exclusionary diagnosis. After adjusting for demographics, body mass index, fatigue subscales, SF-36 subscales and CFS symptoms, CFS-like illness did not remain significantly associated with having an exclusionary diagnosis.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Medical and psychiatric illnesses associated with fatigue are common among the unwell. Those who fulfill CFS-like criteria need to be evaluated for potentially treatable conditions. Those with exclusionary conditions are equally impaired as those without exclusions.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/7/57
work_keys_str_mv AT ungerelizabethr anevaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT naterursm anevaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT bonevaroumianas anevaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT maloneyelizabethm anevaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT linjinmanns anevaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT jonesjamesf anevaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT reeveswilliamc anevaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT ungerelizabethr evaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT naterursm evaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT bonevaroumianas evaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT maloneyelizabethm evaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT linjinmanns evaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT jonesjamesf evaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
AT reeveswilliamc evaluationofexclusionarymedicalpsychiatricconditionsinthedefinitionofchronicfatiguesyndrome
_version_ 1725233056921419776