Analysis of Bubble Flow Mechanism and Characteristics in Gas–Liquid Cyclone Separator

The separation of bubbles in a gas–liquid cyclone is complicated. A combination of numerical simulation and visual experimentation was considered apt to reveal the microscopic mechanisms of bubble flow. First of all, cyclones with different structures were numerically simulated. The calculation resu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yujie Bai, Hong Ji, Yaozhuo Liu, Lei Li, Shengqing Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Processes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/1/123
id doaj-e22841d535f349b9a1ce33120c4bbbd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e22841d535f349b9a1ce33120c4bbbd92021-01-09T00:06:24ZengMDPI AGProcesses2227-97172021-01-01912312310.3390/pr9010123Analysis of Bubble Flow Mechanism and Characteristics in Gas–Liquid Cyclone SeparatorYujie Bai0Hong Ji1Yaozhuo Liu2Lei Li3Shengqing Yang4Energy and Power Engineering School, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, ChinaEnergy and Power Engineering School, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, ChinaEnergy and Power Engineering School, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, ChinaEnergy and Power Engineering School, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, ChinaEnergy and Power Engineering School, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, ChinaThe separation of bubbles in a gas–liquid cyclone is complicated. A combination of numerical simulation and visual experimentation was considered apt to reveal the microscopic mechanisms of bubble flow. First of all, cyclones with different structures were numerically simulated. The calculation results show that the larger the diameter of the exhaust port, the better the bubble flow effect. When the exhaust port diameter was 24 mm, the gas discharge efficiency was 8% higher than that with an exhaust port diameter of 16 mm. The sequence of the bubble flow effect of a four-structure cyclone was obtained, and the gas discharge efficiency of the cyclone with a rectangular inlet was 7% higher than that of the trapezoidal inlet. Finally, a visual experimental platform was built to compare the rectangular inlet cyclone and spiral inlet cyclone with the best bubble flow effect. In accordance with the simulation numerical calculations, the bubble flow effect of the rectangular inlet cyclone was better than that of the spiral and trapezoid inlet cyclones, and the rectangular inlet in the middle was better. This article provides a specific theory and experience to guide further research on the separation mechanism, flow field characteristics and structurally optimal design of gas–liquid cyclones.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/1/123gas–liquid cyclonebubble flownumerical simulationexperimental research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yujie Bai
Hong Ji
Yaozhuo Liu
Lei Li
Shengqing Yang
spellingShingle Yujie Bai
Hong Ji
Yaozhuo Liu
Lei Li
Shengqing Yang
Analysis of Bubble Flow Mechanism and Characteristics in Gas–Liquid Cyclone Separator
Processes
gas–liquid cyclone
bubble flow
numerical simulation
experimental research
author_facet Yujie Bai
Hong Ji
Yaozhuo Liu
Lei Li
Shengqing Yang
author_sort Yujie Bai
title Analysis of Bubble Flow Mechanism and Characteristics in Gas–Liquid Cyclone Separator
title_short Analysis of Bubble Flow Mechanism and Characteristics in Gas–Liquid Cyclone Separator
title_full Analysis of Bubble Flow Mechanism and Characteristics in Gas–Liquid Cyclone Separator
title_fullStr Analysis of Bubble Flow Mechanism and Characteristics in Gas–Liquid Cyclone Separator
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Bubble Flow Mechanism and Characteristics in Gas–Liquid Cyclone Separator
title_sort analysis of bubble flow mechanism and characteristics in gas–liquid cyclone separator
publisher MDPI AG
series Processes
issn 2227-9717
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The separation of bubbles in a gas–liquid cyclone is complicated. A combination of numerical simulation and visual experimentation was considered apt to reveal the microscopic mechanisms of bubble flow. First of all, cyclones with different structures were numerically simulated. The calculation results show that the larger the diameter of the exhaust port, the better the bubble flow effect. When the exhaust port diameter was 24 mm, the gas discharge efficiency was 8% higher than that with an exhaust port diameter of 16 mm. The sequence of the bubble flow effect of a four-structure cyclone was obtained, and the gas discharge efficiency of the cyclone with a rectangular inlet was 7% higher than that of the trapezoidal inlet. Finally, a visual experimental platform was built to compare the rectangular inlet cyclone and spiral inlet cyclone with the best bubble flow effect. In accordance with the simulation numerical calculations, the bubble flow effect of the rectangular inlet cyclone was better than that of the spiral and trapezoid inlet cyclones, and the rectangular inlet in the middle was better. This article provides a specific theory and experience to guide further research on the separation mechanism, flow field characteristics and structurally optimal design of gas–liquid cyclones.
topic gas–liquid cyclone
bubble flow
numerical simulation
experimental research
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/1/123
work_keys_str_mv AT yujiebai analysisofbubbleflowmechanismandcharacteristicsingasliquidcycloneseparator
AT hongji analysisofbubbleflowmechanismandcharacteristicsingasliquidcycloneseparator
AT yaozhuoliu analysisofbubbleflowmechanismandcharacteristicsingasliquidcycloneseparator
AT leili analysisofbubbleflowmechanismandcharacteristicsingasliquidcycloneseparator
AT shengqingyang analysisofbubbleflowmechanismandcharacteristicsingasliquidcycloneseparator
_version_ 1724344147666534400