The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial

Abstract Background Retention of participants in cohort studies is important for validity. One way to promote retention is by sending a persuasive cover letter with surveys. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a covering letter containing social pressure with a standard covering letter o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Cotterill, Kelly Howells, Sarah Rhodes, Peter Bower
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-07-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5
id doaj-e2053ba51719418e94849c618dad3f3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2053ba51719418e94849c618dad3f3a2020-11-25T02:44:16ZengBMCTrials1745-62152017-07-011811910.1186/s13063-017-2090-5The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trialSarah Cotterill0Kelly Howells1Sarah Rhodes2Peter Bower3Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterCentre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterAbstract Background Retention of participants in cohort studies is important for validity. One way to promote retention is by sending a persuasive cover letter with surveys. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a covering letter containing social pressure with a standard covering letter on retention in a health cohort study. Social pressure involves persuading people to behave in a certain way by the promise that their actions will be made know to others. We implemented a mild form of social pressure, where the recipient was told that information about whether they responded to the current survey would be noted by the research team and printed on future correspondence from the research team to the recipient. Methods The design was an embedded randomised controlled retention trial, conducted between July 2015 and April 2016 in Salford, UK. Participants in the host health cohort study were eligible. They received either: (1) a covering letter with two consecutive surveys (sent six and twelve months after recruitment), containing a social pressure intervention; or (2) a matching letter without the social pressure text. The primary outcome was retention in the host study, defined as return of both surveys. Randomisation was computer-generated, with stratification by household size. Participants were blinded to group assignment. Researchers were blinded for outcome ascertainment. Results Adults (n = 4447) aged over 65 years, with a long-term condition and enrolled in the host study, were randomly allocated to receive a social pressure covering letter (n = 2223) or control (n = 2224). All 4447 participants were included in the analysis. Both questionnaires were returned by 1577 participants (71%) sent the social pressure letters and 1511 (68%) sent control letters, a risk difference of 3 percentage points (adjusted odds ratio = 1.16 (95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.33)). Conclusion A mild form of social pressure made a small but significant improvement in retention of older adults in a health cohort study. Investigation of social pressure across other research contexts and stronger social pressure messages is warranted. Trial registration The host cohort study, the Comprehensive Longitudinal Assessment of Salford Integrated Care (CLASSIC) study is associated with the CLASSIC PROTECTs trial, which is registered on the ISRCTN registry. Trial registration number: ISRCTN12286422 . Date of registration 19 June 2014.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5Social pressureGeneral practiceHealth behaviourPrimary careRandomised controlled trialEmbedded
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah Cotterill
Kelly Howells
Sarah Rhodes
Peter Bower
spellingShingle Sarah Cotterill
Kelly Howells
Sarah Rhodes
Peter Bower
The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
Trials
Social pressure
General practice
Health behaviour
Primary care
Randomised controlled trial
Embedded
author_facet Sarah Cotterill
Kelly Howells
Sarah Rhodes
Peter Bower
author_sort Sarah Cotterill
title The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
title_short The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
title_full The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
title_fullStr The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
title_sort effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Abstract Background Retention of participants in cohort studies is important for validity. One way to promote retention is by sending a persuasive cover letter with surveys. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a covering letter containing social pressure with a standard covering letter on retention in a health cohort study. Social pressure involves persuading people to behave in a certain way by the promise that their actions will be made know to others. We implemented a mild form of social pressure, where the recipient was told that information about whether they responded to the current survey would be noted by the research team and printed on future correspondence from the research team to the recipient. Methods The design was an embedded randomised controlled retention trial, conducted between July 2015 and April 2016 in Salford, UK. Participants in the host health cohort study were eligible. They received either: (1) a covering letter with two consecutive surveys (sent six and twelve months after recruitment), containing a social pressure intervention; or (2) a matching letter without the social pressure text. The primary outcome was retention in the host study, defined as return of both surveys. Randomisation was computer-generated, with stratification by household size. Participants were blinded to group assignment. Researchers were blinded for outcome ascertainment. Results Adults (n = 4447) aged over 65 years, with a long-term condition and enrolled in the host study, were randomly allocated to receive a social pressure covering letter (n = 2223) or control (n = 2224). All 4447 participants were included in the analysis. Both questionnaires were returned by 1577 participants (71%) sent the social pressure letters and 1511 (68%) sent control letters, a risk difference of 3 percentage points (adjusted odds ratio = 1.16 (95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.33)). Conclusion A mild form of social pressure made a small but significant improvement in retention of older adults in a health cohort study. Investigation of social pressure across other research contexts and stronger social pressure messages is warranted. Trial registration The host cohort study, the Comprehensive Longitudinal Assessment of Salford Integrated Care (CLASSIC) study is associated with the CLASSIC PROTECTs trial, which is registered on the ISRCTN registry. Trial registration number: ISRCTN12286422 . Date of registration 19 June 2014.
topic Social pressure
General practice
Health behaviour
Primary care
Randomised controlled trial
Embedded
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahcotterill theeffectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial
AT kellyhowells theeffectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial
AT sarahrhodes theeffectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial
AT peterbower theeffectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial
AT sarahcotterill effectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial
AT kellyhowells effectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial
AT sarahrhodes effectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial
AT peterbower effectofusingsocialpressureincoverletterstoimproveretentioninalongitudinalhealthstudyanembeddedrandomisedcontrolledretentiontrial
_version_ 1724766748109963264