Monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws

In most jurisdictions, the rule of law has been the core instrument used to implement rules, regulations and restrictions relating to forests. The results of this approach have relied on the effectiveness of the system for regulating through monitoring and reporting. Despite the obvio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hickey, Gordon, Innes, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2006-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/347
id doaj-e20088a3463e4223b6d7683f7b43a50b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e20088a3463e4223b6d7683f7b43a50b2020-11-25T03:31:15ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752006-01-0140210.14214/sf.347Monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard lawsHickey, GordonInnes, John In most jurisdictions, the rule of law has been the core instrument used to implement rules, regulations and restrictions relating to forests. The results of this approach have relied on the effectiveness of the system for regulating through monitoring and reporting. Despite the obvious differences in the wider operating environment of forestry internationally, issues related to globalization have increased the need for comparison. The potential impact of certain social, economic and environmental differences on the nature of monitoring and information reporting is, therefore, important to forest policy and management. The analysis presented here considered data associated with forestry-related monitoring and information reporting to provide a comparative description of certain hard-law requirements in a sample of jurisdictions. This was done to shed light on the potential for coordinated monitoring and information reporting objectives to be mandated through inter-jurisdictional hard law. Our research suggests that further comparative analysis of hard law monitoring and information reporting requirements could form a central theme in defining the âground rulesâ of a global forest law.https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/347
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hickey, Gordon
Innes, John
spellingShingle Hickey, Gordon
Innes, John
Monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws
Silva Fennica
author_facet Hickey, Gordon
Innes, John
author_sort Hickey, Gordon
title Monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws
title_short Monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws
title_full Monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws
title_fullStr Monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws
title_sort monitoring and information reporting through regulation: an inter-jurisdictional comparison of forestry-related hard laws
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2006-01-01
description In most jurisdictions, the rule of law has been the core instrument used to implement rules, regulations and restrictions relating to forests. The results of this approach have relied on the effectiveness of the system for regulating through monitoring and reporting. Despite the obvious differences in the wider operating environment of forestry internationally, issues related to globalization have increased the need for comparison. The potential impact of certain social, economic and environmental differences on the nature of monitoring and information reporting is, therefore, important to forest policy and management. The analysis presented here considered data associated with forestry-related monitoring and information reporting to provide a comparative description of certain hard-law requirements in a sample of jurisdictions. This was done to shed light on the potential for coordinated monitoring and information reporting objectives to be mandated through inter-jurisdictional hard law. Our research suggests that further comparative analysis of hard law monitoring and information reporting requirements could form a central theme in defining the âground rulesâ of a global forest law.
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/347
work_keys_str_mv AT hickeygordon monitoringandinformationreportingthroughregulationaninterjurisdictionalcomparisonofforestryrelatedhardlaws
AT innesjohn monitoringandinformationreportingthroughregulationaninterjurisdictionalcomparisonofforestryrelatedhardlaws
_version_ 1724572622820212736