Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
No scientific conclusion follows automatically from a statistically non-significant result, yet people routinely use non-significant results to guide conclusions about the status of theories (or the effectiveness of practices). To know whether a non-significant result counts against a theory, or if...
Main Author: | Zoltan eDienes |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781/full |
Similar Items
-
Pragmatism should Not be a Substitute for Statistical Literacy, a Commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018)
by: Ladislas Nalborczyk, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Estimating Relative Risk When Observing Zero Events—Frequentist Inference and Bayesian Credibility Intervals
by: Sören Möller, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
The P value and statistical significance: Misunderstandings, explanations, challenges, and alternatives
by: Chittaranjan Andrade
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Credible Confidence: A Pragmatic View on the Frequentist vs Bayesian Debate
by: Casper J. Albers, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Application of Bayesian Analysis in Medical Diagnosis
by: Vivek Verma, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)