Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization

We provide decidability and undecidability results on the model-checking problem for infinite tree structures. These tree structures are built from sequences of elements of infinite relational structures. More precisely, we deal with the tree iteration of a relational structure M in the sense of Shela...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Spelten, Wolfgang Thomas, Sarah Winter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Publishing Association 2011-11-01
Series:Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Online Access:http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3107v1
id doaj-e1f6ca3c99ef46b6b440587771c3fb3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1f6ca3c99ef46b6b440587771c3fb3f2020-11-24T23:29:33ZengOpen Publishing AssociationElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science2075-21802011-11-0173Proc. INFINITY 2011203410.4204/EPTCS.73.5Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with SynchronizationAlex SpeltenWolfgang ThomasSarah WinterWe provide decidability and undecidability results on the model-checking problem for infinite tree structures. These tree structures are built from sequences of elements of infinite relational structures. More precisely, we deal with the tree iteration of a relational structure M in the sense of Shelah-Stupp. In contrast to classical results where model-checking is shown decidable for MSO-logic, we show decidability of the tree model-checking problem for logics that allow only path quantifiers and chain quantifiers (where chains are subsets of paths), as they appear in branching time logics; however, at the same time the tree is enriched by the equal-level relation (which holds between vertices u, v if they are on the same tree level). We separate cleanly the tree logic from the logic used for expressing properties of the underlying structure M. We illustrate the scope of the decidability results by showing that two slight extensions of the framework lead to undecidability. In particular, this applies to the (stronger) tree iteration in the sense of Muchnik-Walukiewicz.http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3107v1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alex Spelten
Wolfgang Thomas
Sarah Winter
spellingShingle Alex Spelten
Wolfgang Thomas
Sarah Winter
Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
author_facet Alex Spelten
Wolfgang Thomas
Sarah Winter
author_sort Alex Spelten
title Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
title_short Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
title_full Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
title_fullStr Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
title_full_unstemmed Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
title_sort trees over infinite structures and path logics with synchronization
publisher Open Publishing Association
series Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
issn 2075-2180
publishDate 2011-11-01
description We provide decidability and undecidability results on the model-checking problem for infinite tree structures. These tree structures are built from sequences of elements of infinite relational structures. More precisely, we deal with the tree iteration of a relational structure M in the sense of Shelah-Stupp. In contrast to classical results where model-checking is shown decidable for MSO-logic, we show decidability of the tree model-checking problem for logics that allow only path quantifiers and chain quantifiers (where chains are subsets of paths), as they appear in branching time logics; however, at the same time the tree is enriched by the equal-level relation (which holds between vertices u, v if they are on the same tree level). We separate cleanly the tree logic from the logic used for expressing properties of the underlying structure M. We illustrate the scope of the decidability results by showing that two slight extensions of the framework lead to undecidability. In particular, this applies to the (stronger) tree iteration in the sense of Muchnik-Walukiewicz.
url http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3107v1
work_keys_str_mv AT alexspelten treesoverinfinitestructuresandpathlogicswithsynchronization
AT wolfgangthomas treesoverinfinitestructuresandpathlogicswithsynchronization
AT sarahwinter treesoverinfinitestructuresandpathlogicswithsynchronization
_version_ 1725545082668449792