Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
We provide decidability and undecidability results on the model-checking problem for infinite tree structures. These tree structures are built from sequences of elements of infinite relational structures. More precisely, we deal with the tree iteration of a relational structure M in the sense of Shela...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Publishing Association
2011-11-01
|
Series: | Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3107v1 |
id |
doaj-e1f6ca3c99ef46b6b440587771c3fb3f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e1f6ca3c99ef46b6b440587771c3fb3f2020-11-24T23:29:33ZengOpen Publishing AssociationElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science2075-21802011-11-0173Proc. INFINITY 2011203410.4204/EPTCS.73.5Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with SynchronizationAlex SpeltenWolfgang ThomasSarah WinterWe provide decidability and undecidability results on the model-checking problem for infinite tree structures. These tree structures are built from sequences of elements of infinite relational structures. More precisely, we deal with the tree iteration of a relational structure M in the sense of Shelah-Stupp. In contrast to classical results where model-checking is shown decidable for MSO-logic, we show decidability of the tree model-checking problem for logics that allow only path quantifiers and chain quantifiers (where chains are subsets of paths), as they appear in branching time logics; however, at the same time the tree is enriched by the equal-level relation (which holds between vertices u, v if they are on the same tree level). We separate cleanly the tree logic from the logic used for expressing properties of the underlying structure M. We illustrate the scope of the decidability results by showing that two slight extensions of the framework lead to undecidability. In particular, this applies to the (stronger) tree iteration in the sense of Muchnik-Walukiewicz.http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3107v1 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alex Spelten Wolfgang Thomas Sarah Winter |
spellingShingle |
Alex Spelten Wolfgang Thomas Sarah Winter Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
author_facet |
Alex Spelten Wolfgang Thomas Sarah Winter |
author_sort |
Alex Spelten |
title |
Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization |
title_short |
Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization |
title_full |
Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization |
title_fullStr |
Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization |
title_sort |
trees over infinite structures and path logics with synchronization |
publisher |
Open Publishing Association |
series |
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
issn |
2075-2180 |
publishDate |
2011-11-01 |
description |
We provide decidability and undecidability results on the model-checking problem for infinite tree structures. These tree structures are built from sequences of elements of infinite relational structures. More precisely, we deal with the tree iteration of a relational structure M in the sense of Shelah-Stupp. In contrast to classical results where model-checking is shown decidable for MSO-logic, we show decidability of the tree model-checking problem for logics that allow only path quantifiers and chain quantifiers (where chains are subsets of paths), as they appear in branching time logics; however, at the same time the tree is enriched by the equal-level relation (which holds between vertices u, v if they are on the same tree level). We separate cleanly the tree logic from the logic used for expressing properties of the underlying structure M. We illustrate the scope of the decidability results by showing that two slight extensions of the framework lead to undecidability. In particular, this applies to the (stronger) tree iteration in the sense of Muchnik-Walukiewicz. |
url |
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3107v1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexspelten treesoverinfinitestructuresandpathlogicswithsynchronization AT wolfgangthomas treesoverinfinitestructuresandpathlogicswithsynchronization AT sarahwinter treesoverinfinitestructuresandpathlogicswithsynchronization |
_version_ |
1725545082668449792 |