Factors Affecting Teacher-Candidates’ Practicum Evaluations

This report is an extension of a study that examined the final evaluations of 17 cohorts of teacher-candidates (n=374), who completed their 16-week extended-practicum through one Western Canadian university in one of the years from 1986 to 2002. Evaluation results based on nine instructional categ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Edwin Ralph
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2006-12-01
Series:Journal of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jtl.uwindsor.ca/index.php/jtl/article/view/101
id doaj-e1e7ec9741b1492a826a78b630ee597d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1e7ec9741b1492a826a78b630ee597d2020-11-25T02:55:48ZengUniversity of WindsorJournal of Teaching and Learning1911-82792006-12-013210.22329/jtl.v3i2.101Factors Affecting Teacher-Candidates’ Practicum EvaluationsEdwin Ralph0University of SaskatchewanThis report is an extension of a study that examined the final evaluations of 17 cohorts of teacher-candidates (n=374), who completed their 16-week extended-practicum through one Western Canadian university in one of the years from 1986 to 2002. Evaluation results based on nine instructional categories were analyzed according to four factors: (a) grade level taught; (b) school location; (c) year of the internship; and (d) gender of the intern. Descriptive statistics calculated for each of these four factors revealed minor differences in the intern sub-groups’ aggregates of final evaluation ratings. For grade level, interns who taught K-3 were rated slightly higher than those in the other grade levels in six of the nine instructional skills. The interns who taught grade 7-12 were rated lowest of the three groups in three of the teaching categories. With respect to urban/rural school location of the internship, interns from rural schools were evaluated slightly higher than their urban counterparts for six of the nine skills. For year of the practicum, calculations showed slightly better evaluations in three teaching skills for interns who completed the practicum after 1996, than for those who completed it during the 1986-1995 period. Female interns were rated slightly higher in eight of the nine teaching categories than were their male colleagues. Possible explanations accounting for these minor differences are provided, and implications discussed for the program under study and for their “transferability” (Donmoyer, 1990) to pre-service teacher preparation programs.https://jtl.uwindsor.ca/index.php/jtl/article/view/101FactorsEvaluationPracticumTeacher-CandidateStudyTeacher
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edwin Ralph
spellingShingle Edwin Ralph
Factors Affecting Teacher-Candidates’ Practicum Evaluations
Journal of Teaching and Learning
Factors
Evaluation
Practicum
Teacher-Candidate
Study
Teacher
author_facet Edwin Ralph
author_sort Edwin Ralph
title Factors Affecting Teacher-Candidates’ Practicum Evaluations
title_short Factors Affecting Teacher-Candidates’ Practicum Evaluations
title_full Factors Affecting Teacher-Candidates’ Practicum Evaluations
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Teacher-Candidates’ Practicum Evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Teacher-Candidates’ Practicum Evaluations
title_sort factors affecting teacher-candidates’ practicum evaluations
publisher University of Windsor
series Journal of Teaching and Learning
issn 1911-8279
publishDate 2006-12-01
description This report is an extension of a study that examined the final evaluations of 17 cohorts of teacher-candidates (n=374), who completed their 16-week extended-practicum through one Western Canadian university in one of the years from 1986 to 2002. Evaluation results based on nine instructional categories were analyzed according to four factors: (a) grade level taught; (b) school location; (c) year of the internship; and (d) gender of the intern. Descriptive statistics calculated for each of these four factors revealed minor differences in the intern sub-groups’ aggregates of final evaluation ratings. For grade level, interns who taught K-3 were rated slightly higher than those in the other grade levels in six of the nine instructional skills. The interns who taught grade 7-12 were rated lowest of the three groups in three of the teaching categories. With respect to urban/rural school location of the internship, interns from rural schools were evaluated slightly higher than their urban counterparts for six of the nine skills. For year of the practicum, calculations showed slightly better evaluations in three teaching skills for interns who completed the practicum after 1996, than for those who completed it during the 1986-1995 period. Female interns were rated slightly higher in eight of the nine teaching categories than were their male colleagues. Possible explanations accounting for these minor differences are provided, and implications discussed for the program under study and for their “transferability” (Donmoyer, 1990) to pre-service teacher preparation programs.
topic Factors
Evaluation
Practicum
Teacher-Candidate
Study
Teacher
url https://jtl.uwindsor.ca/index.php/jtl/article/view/101
work_keys_str_mv AT edwinralph factorsaffectingteachercandidatespracticumevaluations
_version_ 1724716112035184640