La construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle
French historians of the second half of the XXe century are more aware than their predecessors that historical research and writing means continuous interaction between past and present. Most of them have substituted the grammatical present for the preterit as the basic tense of the narrative. They...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
ADR Temporalités
2004-01-01
|
Series: | Temporalités |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/614 |
id |
doaj-e1e410dba5b84c20b17e0ab3e73a9d58 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e1e410dba5b84c20b17e0ab3e73a9d582020-11-25T00:36:29ZfraADR TemporalitésTemporalités1777-90062102-58782004-01-01110.4000/temporalites.614La construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du XXe siècleJean LeducFrench historians of the second half of the XXe century are more aware than their predecessors that historical research and writing means continuous interaction between past and present. Most of them have substituted the grammatical present for the preterit as the basic tense of the narrative. They pay more attention to trends and long-term phenomena than to short-term events. They are less reluctant to study the most recent past, but this issue remains controversial. Openly or not, chronological story is still the prevailing model, as is the absolute dating system according to the calendar. Historians are careful to avoid arbitrary chronological divisions and they stress that a sequence of events does not imply a relationship of cause and effect between them. Theorical discussions are on-going but, more often than not are the result of encouragement from outside the historical professions.http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/614criss-crossing of temporalitiesdiscontinuitiesimportance of the narrativeinteraction between past and presentlinearitylong-term |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fra |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jean Leduc |
spellingShingle |
Jean Leduc La construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle Temporalités criss-crossing of temporalities discontinuities importance of the narrative interaction between past and present linearity long-term |
author_facet |
Jean Leduc |
author_sort |
Jean Leduc |
title |
La construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle |
title_short |
La construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle |
title_full |
La construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle |
title_fullStr |
La construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle |
title_full_unstemmed |
La construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle |
title_sort |
la construction du temps chez les historiens universitaires français de la seconde moitié du xxe siècle |
publisher |
ADR Temporalités |
series |
Temporalités |
issn |
1777-9006 2102-5878 |
publishDate |
2004-01-01 |
description |
French historians of the second half of the XXe century are more aware than their predecessors that historical research and writing means continuous interaction between past and present. Most of them have substituted the grammatical present for the preterit as the basic tense of the narrative. They pay more attention to trends and long-term phenomena than to short-term events. They are less reluctant to study the most recent past, but this issue remains controversial. Openly or not, chronological story is still the prevailing model, as is the absolute dating system according to the calendar. Historians are careful to avoid arbitrary chronological divisions and they stress that a sequence of events does not imply a relationship of cause and effect between them. Theorical discussions are on-going but, more often than not are the result of encouragement from outside the historical professions. |
topic |
criss-crossing of temporalities discontinuities importance of the narrative interaction between past and present linearity long-term |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/614 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeanleduc laconstructiondutempschezleshistoriensuniversitairesfrancaisdelasecondemoitieduxxesiecle |
_version_ |
1725305010763333632 |