The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.

BACKGROUND:The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Charinna B Amparo, Sarah I Jayme, Maria Concepcion R Roces, Maria Consorcia L Quizon, Ernesto E S Villalon, Beatriz P Quiambao, Mario S Baquilod, Leda M Hernandez, Louise H Taylor, Louis H Nel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042697?pdf=render
id doaj-e1dfacd6a3de43f4a999042615cb980c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1dfacd6a3de43f4a999042615cb980c2020-11-24T21:09:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e019918610.1371/journal.pone.0199186The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.Anna Charinna B AmparoSarah I JaymeMaria Concepcion R RocesMaria Consorcia L QuizonErnesto E S VillalonBeatriz P QuiambaoMario S BaquilodLeda M HernandezLouise H TaylorLouis H NelBACKGROUND:The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant interviews and surveys in sample ABTCs to determine the cost-effectiveness of this network in preventing human rabies deaths. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:One urban and one rural ABTC in each of three selected provinces were studied in more detail. PEP delivery generally followed national guidance based on best practices, but there was evidence of operational challenges in supplying all ABTCs with adequate biologics and recently trained staff. Funding was contributed by different levels of government and in some clinics, patients paid for a significant fraction of the total cost. From a health provider perspective including both fixed and variable costs, the average PEP course delivered cost USD 32.91 /patient across urban ABTCs (with higher patient throughput) and USD 57.21 /patient across rural ABTCs. These costs suggests that PEP provision in the Philippines cost USD 37.6 million in 2016, with a cost per life saved of USD 8,290. An analysis of the 2,239 suspected rabies deaths from 2008 to 2016 showed no significant decline, and from 2014-16 an average of 8,534 years of life were lost annually. The incidence of rabies deaths from 2014-16 was not clearly related to the provision of ABTCs (per 100,000 population) or human population density, but deaths were more common in higher income provinces. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:In the context of comprehensive rabies control (including dog vaccination and public awareness) ways to reduce this high expenditure on PEP should be explored, to most cost-effectively reach the elimination of human rabies deaths. This paper is accompanied by another containing data on the operation of ABTCs network from a patient perspective.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042697?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Charinna B Amparo
Sarah I Jayme
Maria Concepcion R Roces
Maria Consorcia L Quizon
Ernesto E S Villalon
Beatriz P Quiambao
Mario S Baquilod
Leda M Hernandez
Louise H Taylor
Louis H Nel
spellingShingle Anna Charinna B Amparo
Sarah I Jayme
Maria Concepcion R Roces
Maria Consorcia L Quizon
Ernesto E S Villalon
Beatriz P Quiambao
Mario S Baquilod
Leda M Hernandez
Louise H Taylor
Louis H Nel
The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Anna Charinna B Amparo
Sarah I Jayme
Maria Concepcion R Roces
Maria Consorcia L Quizon
Ernesto E S Villalon
Beatriz P Quiambao
Mario S Baquilod
Leda M Hernandez
Louise H Taylor
Louis H Nel
author_sort Anna Charinna B Amparo
title The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.
title_short The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.
title_full The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.
title_fullStr The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.
title_sort evaluation of operating animal bite treatment centers in the philippines from a health provider perspective.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description BACKGROUND:The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant interviews and surveys in sample ABTCs to determine the cost-effectiveness of this network in preventing human rabies deaths. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:One urban and one rural ABTC in each of three selected provinces were studied in more detail. PEP delivery generally followed national guidance based on best practices, but there was evidence of operational challenges in supplying all ABTCs with adequate biologics and recently trained staff. Funding was contributed by different levels of government and in some clinics, patients paid for a significant fraction of the total cost. From a health provider perspective including both fixed and variable costs, the average PEP course delivered cost USD 32.91 /patient across urban ABTCs (with higher patient throughput) and USD 57.21 /patient across rural ABTCs. These costs suggests that PEP provision in the Philippines cost USD 37.6 million in 2016, with a cost per life saved of USD 8,290. An analysis of the 2,239 suspected rabies deaths from 2008 to 2016 showed no significant decline, and from 2014-16 an average of 8,534 years of life were lost annually. The incidence of rabies deaths from 2014-16 was not clearly related to the provision of ABTCs (per 100,000 population) or human population density, but deaths were more common in higher income provinces. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:In the context of comprehensive rabies control (including dog vaccination and public awareness) ways to reduce this high expenditure on PEP should be explored, to most cost-effectively reach the elimination of human rabies deaths. This paper is accompanied by another containing data on the operation of ABTCs network from a patient perspective.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042697?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT annacharinnabamparo theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT sarahijayme theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT mariaconcepcionrroces theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT mariaconsorcialquizon theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT ernestoesvillalon theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT beatrizpquiambao theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT mariosbaquilod theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT ledamhernandez theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT louisehtaylor theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT louishnel theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT annacharinnabamparo evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT sarahijayme evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT mariaconcepcionrroces evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT mariaconsorcialquizon evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT ernestoesvillalon evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT beatrizpquiambao evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT mariosbaquilod evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT ledamhernandez evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT louisehtaylor evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
AT louishnel evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective
_version_ 1716757767259160576