The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.
BACKGROUND:The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042697?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-e1dfacd6a3de43f4a999042615cb980c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e1dfacd6a3de43f4a999042615cb980c2020-11-24T21:09:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e019918610.1371/journal.pone.0199186The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective.Anna Charinna B AmparoSarah I JaymeMaria Concepcion R RocesMaria Consorcia L QuizonErnesto E S VillalonBeatriz P QuiambaoMario S BaquilodLeda M HernandezLouise H TaylorLouis H NelBACKGROUND:The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant interviews and surveys in sample ABTCs to determine the cost-effectiveness of this network in preventing human rabies deaths. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:One urban and one rural ABTC in each of three selected provinces were studied in more detail. PEP delivery generally followed national guidance based on best practices, but there was evidence of operational challenges in supplying all ABTCs with adequate biologics and recently trained staff. Funding was contributed by different levels of government and in some clinics, patients paid for a significant fraction of the total cost. From a health provider perspective including both fixed and variable costs, the average PEP course delivered cost USD 32.91 /patient across urban ABTCs (with higher patient throughput) and USD 57.21 /patient across rural ABTCs. These costs suggests that PEP provision in the Philippines cost USD 37.6 million in 2016, with a cost per life saved of USD 8,290. An analysis of the 2,239 suspected rabies deaths from 2008 to 2016 showed no significant decline, and from 2014-16 an average of 8,534 years of life were lost annually. The incidence of rabies deaths from 2014-16 was not clearly related to the provision of ABTCs (per 100,000 population) or human population density, but deaths were more common in higher income provinces. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:In the context of comprehensive rabies control (including dog vaccination and public awareness) ways to reduce this high expenditure on PEP should be explored, to most cost-effectively reach the elimination of human rabies deaths. This paper is accompanied by another containing data on the operation of ABTCs network from a patient perspective.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042697?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna Charinna B Amparo Sarah I Jayme Maria Concepcion R Roces Maria Consorcia L Quizon Ernesto E S Villalon Beatriz P Quiambao Mario S Baquilod Leda M Hernandez Louise H Taylor Louis H Nel |
spellingShingle |
Anna Charinna B Amparo Sarah I Jayme Maria Concepcion R Roces Maria Consorcia L Quizon Ernesto E S Villalon Beatriz P Quiambao Mario S Baquilod Leda M Hernandez Louise H Taylor Louis H Nel The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Anna Charinna B Amparo Sarah I Jayme Maria Concepcion R Roces Maria Consorcia L Quizon Ernesto E S Villalon Beatriz P Quiambao Mario S Baquilod Leda M Hernandez Louise H Taylor Louis H Nel |
author_sort |
Anna Charinna B Amparo |
title |
The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective. |
title_short |
The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective. |
title_full |
The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective. |
title_fullStr |
The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective. |
title_sort |
evaluation of operating animal bite treatment centers in the philippines from a health provider perspective. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND:The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant interviews and surveys in sample ABTCs to determine the cost-effectiveness of this network in preventing human rabies deaths. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:One urban and one rural ABTC in each of three selected provinces were studied in more detail. PEP delivery generally followed national guidance based on best practices, but there was evidence of operational challenges in supplying all ABTCs with adequate biologics and recently trained staff. Funding was contributed by different levels of government and in some clinics, patients paid for a significant fraction of the total cost. From a health provider perspective including both fixed and variable costs, the average PEP course delivered cost USD 32.91 /patient across urban ABTCs (with higher patient throughput) and USD 57.21 /patient across rural ABTCs. These costs suggests that PEP provision in the Philippines cost USD 37.6 million in 2016, with a cost per life saved of USD 8,290. An analysis of the 2,239 suspected rabies deaths from 2008 to 2016 showed no significant decline, and from 2014-16 an average of 8,534 years of life were lost annually. The incidence of rabies deaths from 2014-16 was not clearly related to the provision of ABTCs (per 100,000 population) or human population density, but deaths were more common in higher income provinces. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:In the context of comprehensive rabies control (including dog vaccination and public awareness) ways to reduce this high expenditure on PEP should be explored, to most cost-effectively reach the elimination of human rabies deaths. This paper is accompanied by another containing data on the operation of ABTCs network from a patient perspective. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042697?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annacharinnabamparo theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT sarahijayme theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT mariaconcepcionrroces theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT mariaconsorcialquizon theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT ernestoesvillalon theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT beatrizpquiambao theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT mariosbaquilod theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT ledamhernandez theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT louisehtaylor theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT louishnel theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT annacharinnabamparo evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT sarahijayme evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT mariaconcepcionrroces evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT mariaconsorcialquizon evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT ernestoesvillalon evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT beatrizpquiambao evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT mariosbaquilod evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT ledamhernandez evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT louisehtaylor evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT louishnel evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective |
_version_ |
1716757767259160576 |