Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?
Obesity is an independent risk factor for development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Whether weight loss provides any additional benefit beyond blood pressure (BP) control is unclear. To simulate a trial, we used the Archimedes model, a person-specific simulation model including d...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Korean Society of Nephrology
2012-06-01
|
Series: | Kidney Research and Clinical Practice |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211913212005529 |
id |
doaj-e1bf52f511c644a698a2529b3e083fd1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e1bf52f511c644a698a2529b3e083fd12020-11-24T21:49:04ZengThe Korean Society of NephrologyKidney Research and Clinical Practice2211-91322012-06-01312A6610.1016/j.krcp.2012.04.519Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?Uptal PatelShelby ReedObesity is an independent risk factor for development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Whether weight loss provides any additional benefit beyond blood pressure (BP) control is unclear. To simulate a trial, we used the Archimedes model, a person-specific simulation model including detailed representations of physiology, diseases, and health care systems. Our population-based sample represented individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and DKD drawn from 1999-2006 cohorts of NHANES. Simulations were generated to estimate costs and health outcomes across time for 3 treatment strategies: (1) standard of care (STD); (2) blood pressure control (BP); and (3) BP combined with 5% weight loss (BPWT). BP control represents 3.5%&6% reductions for those with SBP>130 and SBP>140, respectively. Over a 20y time horizon, discounted costs for the STD group were $165,261 with discounted quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 5.89. With BP estimated at $30/month, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $26,626/QALY compared to STD. With BPWT at $50/month, the ICER was $31,773 compared to STD. Even with varying intervention costs and durations (Figure), the ICERs remained favorable, especially for the BPWT group.In conclusion, weight loss in addition to BP control appears to provide favorable value, particularly over moderate time horizons.fx1http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211913212005529 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Uptal Patel Shelby Reed |
spellingShingle |
Uptal Patel Shelby Reed Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease? Kidney Research and Clinical Practice |
author_facet |
Uptal Patel Shelby Reed |
author_sort |
Uptal Patel |
title |
Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease? |
title_short |
Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease? |
title_full |
Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease? |
title_fullStr |
Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease? |
title_sort |
does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease? |
publisher |
The Korean Society of Nephrology |
series |
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice |
issn |
2211-9132 |
publishDate |
2012-06-01 |
description |
Obesity is an independent risk factor for development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Whether weight loss provides any additional benefit beyond blood pressure (BP) control is unclear. To simulate a trial, we used the Archimedes model, a person-specific simulation model including detailed representations of physiology, diseases, and health care systems. Our population-based sample represented individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and DKD drawn from 1999-2006 cohorts of NHANES. Simulations were generated to estimate costs and health outcomes across time for 3 treatment strategies: (1) standard of care (STD); (2) blood pressure control (BP); and (3) BP combined with 5% weight loss (BPWT). BP control represents 3.5%&6% reductions for those with SBP>130 and SBP>140, respectively. Over a 20y time horizon, discounted costs for the STD group were $165,261 with discounted quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 5.89. With BP estimated at $30/month, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $26,626/QALY compared to STD. With BPWT at $50/month, the ICER was $31,773 compared to STD. Even with varying intervention costs and durations (Figure), the ICERs remained favorable, especially for the BPWT group.In conclusion, weight loss in addition to BP control appears to provide favorable value, particularly over moderate time horizons.fx1 |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211913212005529 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT uptalpatel doesweightlossaddvaluetobloodpressurecontrolamongpatientswithdiabetickidneydisease AT shelbyreed doesweightlossaddvaluetobloodpressurecontrolamongpatientswithdiabetickidneydisease |
_version_ |
1725889676751929344 |