Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?

Obesity is an independent risk factor for development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Whether weight loss provides any additional benefit beyond blood pressure (BP) control is unclear. To simulate a trial, we used the Archimedes model, a person-specific simulation model including d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uptal Patel, Shelby Reed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Korean Society of Nephrology 2012-06-01
Series:Kidney Research and Clinical Practice
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211913212005529
id doaj-e1bf52f511c644a698a2529b3e083fd1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1bf52f511c644a698a2529b3e083fd12020-11-24T21:49:04ZengThe Korean Society of NephrologyKidney Research and Clinical Practice2211-91322012-06-01312A6610.1016/j.krcp.2012.04.519Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?Uptal PatelShelby ReedObesity is an independent risk factor for development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Whether weight loss provides any additional benefit beyond blood pressure (BP) control is unclear. To simulate a trial, we used the Archimedes model, a person-specific simulation model including detailed representations of physiology, diseases, and health care systems. Our population-based sample represented individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and DKD drawn from 1999-2006 cohorts of NHANES. Simulations were generated to estimate costs and health outcomes across time for 3 treatment strategies: (1) standard of care (STD); (2) blood pressure control (BP); and (3) BP combined with 5% weight loss (BPWT). BP control represents 3.5%&6% reductions for those with SBP>130 and SBP>140, respectively. Over a 20y time horizon, discounted costs for the STD group were $165,261 with discounted quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 5.89. With BP estimated at $30/month, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $26,626/QALY compared to STD. With BPWT at $50/month, the ICER was $31,773 compared to STD. Even with varying intervention costs and durations (Figure), the ICERs remained favorable, especially for the BPWT group.In conclusion, weight loss in addition to BP control appears to provide favorable value, particularly over moderate time horizons.fx1http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211913212005529
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Uptal Patel
Shelby Reed
spellingShingle Uptal Patel
Shelby Reed
Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice
author_facet Uptal Patel
Shelby Reed
author_sort Uptal Patel
title Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?
title_short Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?
title_full Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?
title_fullStr Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?
title_full_unstemmed Does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?
title_sort does weight loss add value to blood pressure control among patients with diabetic kidney disease?
publisher The Korean Society of Nephrology
series Kidney Research and Clinical Practice
issn 2211-9132
publishDate 2012-06-01
description Obesity is an independent risk factor for development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Whether weight loss provides any additional benefit beyond blood pressure (BP) control is unclear. To simulate a trial, we used the Archimedes model, a person-specific simulation model including detailed representations of physiology, diseases, and health care systems. Our population-based sample represented individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and DKD drawn from 1999-2006 cohorts of NHANES. Simulations were generated to estimate costs and health outcomes across time for 3 treatment strategies: (1) standard of care (STD); (2) blood pressure control (BP); and (3) BP combined with 5% weight loss (BPWT). BP control represents 3.5%&6% reductions for those with SBP>130 and SBP>140, respectively. Over a 20y time horizon, discounted costs for the STD group were $165,261 with discounted quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 5.89. With BP estimated at $30/month, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $26,626/QALY compared to STD. With BPWT at $50/month, the ICER was $31,773 compared to STD. Even with varying intervention costs and durations (Figure), the ICERs remained favorable, especially for the BPWT group.In conclusion, weight loss in addition to BP control appears to provide favorable value, particularly over moderate time horizons.fx1
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211913212005529
work_keys_str_mv AT uptalpatel doesweightlossaddvaluetobloodpressurecontrolamongpatientswithdiabetickidneydisease
AT shelbyreed doesweightlossaddvaluetobloodpressurecontrolamongpatientswithdiabetickidneydisease
_version_ 1725889676751929344