Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses

Purpose. To assess the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic injection of two botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) doses for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods. Men with symptomatic BPH who failed medical treatment were randomized to receive 100 U or 200 U of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: René Arnouk, Carlos Henrique Suzuki Bellucci, Roberto Benatuil Stull, José de Bessa Junior, Cesar Augusto Malave, Cristiano Mendes Gomes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/463574
id doaj-e1b7d805a4c94c76a7a39bc2eef9d902
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1b7d805a4c94c76a7a39bc2eef9d9022020-11-24T21:48:59ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2012-01-01201210.1100/2012/463574463574Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two DosesRené Arnouk0Carlos Henrique Suzuki Bellucci1Roberto Benatuil Stull2José de Bessa Junior3Cesar Augusto Malave4Cristiano Mendes Gomes5Department of Urology, Dr. Carlos Arvelo Military Hospital, 1060 Caracas, Miranda, VenezuelaUroclínica de Joinville, Rua Otto Boehm, 477—Atiradores, 89201-700 Joinville, SC, BrazilDepartment of Urology, Dr. Carlos Arvelo Military Hospital, 1060 Caracas, Miranda, VenezuelaDivision of Urology, State University of Feira de Santana, 44031-460 Feira de Santana, BA, BrazilDepartment of Urology, Dr. Carlos Arvelo Military Hospital, 1060 Caracas, Miranda, VenezuelaDivision of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, 01005-010 Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilPurpose. To assess the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic injection of two botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) doses for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods. Men with symptomatic BPH who failed medical treatment were randomized to receive 100 U or 200 U of BoNT-A into the prostate. The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), PSA levels and prostate volume before injection and after 3 and 6 months were evaluated. Adverse events were compared between the groups. Results. Thirty four patients were evaluated, including 17 in the BoNT-A 100 U group and 17 in the BoNT-A 200 U group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Both doses produced significant improvements in IPSS, Qmax and PVR after 3 and 6 months and both doses promoted comparable effects. Prostate volume was affected by 200 U BoNT-A injection only after 6 months of treatment. PSA levels were significantly affected in the 100 U group only after 6 months of treatment. In the 200 U group, PSA levels were significantly decreased after 3 and 6 months. The complication rate was similar in both groups. Conclusions. Efficacy and safety of both BoNT-A doses are similar for BPH treatment in the short term followup.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/463574
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author René Arnouk
Carlos Henrique Suzuki Bellucci
Roberto Benatuil Stull
José de Bessa Junior
Cesar Augusto Malave
Cristiano Mendes Gomes
spellingShingle René Arnouk
Carlos Henrique Suzuki Bellucci
Roberto Benatuil Stull
José de Bessa Junior
Cesar Augusto Malave
Cristiano Mendes Gomes
Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet René Arnouk
Carlos Henrique Suzuki Bellucci
Roberto Benatuil Stull
José de Bessa Junior
Cesar Augusto Malave
Cristiano Mendes Gomes
author_sort René Arnouk
title Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_short Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_full Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_fullStr Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_full_unstemmed Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_sort botulinum neurotoxin type a for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized study comparing two doses
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Purpose. To assess the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic injection of two botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) doses for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods. Men with symptomatic BPH who failed medical treatment were randomized to receive 100 U or 200 U of BoNT-A into the prostate. The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), PSA levels and prostate volume before injection and after 3 and 6 months were evaluated. Adverse events were compared between the groups. Results. Thirty four patients were evaluated, including 17 in the BoNT-A 100 U group and 17 in the BoNT-A 200 U group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Both doses produced significant improvements in IPSS, Qmax and PVR after 3 and 6 months and both doses promoted comparable effects. Prostate volume was affected by 200 U BoNT-A injection only after 6 months of treatment. PSA levels were significantly affected in the 100 U group only after 6 months of treatment. In the 200 U group, PSA levels were significantly decreased after 3 and 6 months. The complication rate was similar in both groups. Conclusions. Efficacy and safety of both BoNT-A doses are similar for BPH treatment in the short term followup.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/463574
work_keys_str_mv AT renearnouk botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT carloshenriquesuzukibellucci botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT robertobenatuilstull botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT josedebessajunior botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT cesaraugustomalave botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT cristianomendesgomes botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
_version_ 1725890140044263424