The Quantum Supremacy Tsirelson Inequality
A leading proposal for verifying near-term quantum supremacy experiments on noisy random quantum circuits is linear cross-entropy benchmarking. For a quantum circuit $C$ on $n$ qubits and a sample $z \in \{0,1\}^n$, the benchmark involves computing $|\langle z|C|0^n \rangle|^2$, i.e. the probability...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Quantum |
Online Access: | https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2021-10-07-560/pdf/ |
id |
doaj-e18ee45c2daa411d87dfd6256b06a8c2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e18ee45c2daa411d87dfd6256b06a8c22021-10-07T11:27:55ZengVerein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den QuantenwissenschaftenQuantum2521-327X2021-10-01556010.22331/q-2021-10-07-56010.22331/q-2021-10-07-560The Quantum Supremacy Tsirelson InequalityWilliam KretschmerA leading proposal for verifying near-term quantum supremacy experiments on noisy random quantum circuits is linear cross-entropy benchmarking. For a quantum circuit $C$ on $n$ qubits and a sample $z \in \{0,1\}^n$, the benchmark involves computing $|\langle z|C|0^n \rangle|^2$, i.e. the probability of measuring $z$ from the output distribution of $C$ on the all zeros input. Under a strong conjecture about the classical hardness of estimating output probabilities of quantum circuits, no polynomial-time classical algorithm given $C$ can output a string $z$ such that $|\langle z|C|0^n\rangle|^2$ is substantially larger than $\frac{1}{2^n}$ (Aaronson and Gunn, 2019). On the other hand, for a random quantum circuit $C$, sampling $z$ from the output distribution of $C$ achieves $|\langle z|C|0^n\rangle|^2 \approx \frac{2}{2^n}$ on average (Arute et al., 2019). In analogy with the Tsirelson inequality from quantum nonlocal correlations, we ask: can a polynomial-time quantum algorithm do substantially better than $\frac{2}{2^n}$? We study this question in the query (or black box) model, where the quantum algorithm is given oracle access to $C$. We show that, for any $\varepsilon \ge \frac{1}{\mathrm{poly}(n)}$, outputting a sample $z$ such that $|\langle z|C|0^n\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{2 + \varepsilon}{2^n}$ on average requires at least $\Omega\left(\frac{2^{n/4}}{\mathrm{poly}(n)}\right)$ queries to $C$, but not more than $O\left(2^{n/3}\right)$ queries to $C$, if $C$ is either a Haar-random $n$-qubit unitary, or a canonical state preparation oracle for a Haar-random $n$-qubit state. We also show that when $C$ samples from the Fourier distribution of a random Boolean function, the naive algorithm that samples from $C$ is the optimal 1-query algorithm for maximizing $|\langle z|C|0^n\rangle|^2$ on average.https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2021-10-07-560/pdf/ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
William Kretschmer |
spellingShingle |
William Kretschmer The Quantum Supremacy Tsirelson Inequality Quantum |
author_facet |
William Kretschmer |
author_sort |
William Kretschmer |
title |
The Quantum Supremacy Tsirelson Inequality |
title_short |
The Quantum Supremacy Tsirelson Inequality |
title_full |
The Quantum Supremacy Tsirelson Inequality |
title_fullStr |
The Quantum Supremacy Tsirelson Inequality |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Quantum Supremacy Tsirelson Inequality |
title_sort |
quantum supremacy tsirelson inequality |
publisher |
Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften |
series |
Quantum |
issn |
2521-327X |
publishDate |
2021-10-01 |
description |
A leading proposal for verifying near-term quantum supremacy experiments on noisy random quantum circuits is linear cross-entropy benchmarking. For a quantum circuit $C$ on $n$ qubits and a sample $z \in \{0,1\}^n$, the benchmark involves computing $|\langle z|C|0^n \rangle|^2$, i.e. the probability of measuring $z$ from the output distribution of $C$ on the all zeros input. Under a strong conjecture about the classical hardness of estimating output probabilities of quantum circuits, no polynomial-time classical algorithm given $C$ can output a string $z$ such that $|\langle z|C|0^n\rangle|^2$ is substantially larger than $\frac{1}{2^n}$ (Aaronson and Gunn, 2019). On the other hand, for a random quantum circuit $C$, sampling $z$ from the output distribution of $C$ achieves $|\langle z|C|0^n\rangle|^2 \approx \frac{2}{2^n}$ on average (Arute et al., 2019).
In analogy with the Tsirelson inequality from quantum nonlocal correlations, we ask: can a polynomial-time quantum algorithm do substantially better than $\frac{2}{2^n}$? We study this question in the query (or black box) model, where the quantum algorithm is given oracle access to $C$. We show that, for any $\varepsilon \ge \frac{1}{\mathrm{poly}(n)}$, outputting a sample $z$ such that $|\langle z|C|0^n\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{2 + \varepsilon}{2^n}$ on average requires at least $\Omega\left(\frac{2^{n/4}}{\mathrm{poly}(n)}\right)$ queries to $C$, but not more than $O\left(2^{n/3}\right)$ queries to $C$, if $C$ is either a Haar-random $n$-qubit unitary, or a canonical state preparation oracle for a Haar-random $n$-qubit state. We also show that when $C$ samples from the Fourier distribution of a random Boolean function, the naive algorithm that samples from $C$ is the optimal 1-query algorithm for maximizing $|\langle z|C|0^n\rangle|^2$ on average. |
url |
https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2021-10-07-560/pdf/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT williamkretschmer thequantumsupremacytsirelsoninequality AT williamkretschmer quantumsupremacytsirelsoninequality |
_version_ |
1716839443849019392 |