Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effect of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) on pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases (updated March 2020) were searched...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhenghao Wang, Guo Chen, Jia Wang, Wuran Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237783
id doaj-e18bb07cfbd04d21b3722271da2e44aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e18bb07cfbd04d21b3722271da2e44aa2021-03-03T22:10:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011510e023778310.1371/journal.pone.0237783Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Zhenghao WangGuo ChenJia WangWuran WeiA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effect of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) on pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases (updated March 2020) were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of EMLA for patients that underwent ESWL. The search strategy and study selection process were managed according to the PRISMA statement. Six RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the results indicated that EMLA significantly reduced pain compared to the control group (RR = -2.98, 95% CI = -5.82 to -0.13, P = 0.04) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 57% (P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis showed that EMLA did not significantly reduce pain when the patients took an analgesic premedication (RR = -1.46, 95% CI = -5.89 to 2.98, P = 0.52) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 38% (P = 0.52). Conversely, studies without premedication showed a significant pain relief effect (RR = -4.08, 95% CI = -7.36 to -0.65, P = -0.80) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 48% (P = 0.14). Most studies showed there was no difference in the patient's need for analgesics. EMLA was effective for reducing pain during EWSL. However, this analgesic effect was limited and did not reduce the need for analgesics.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237783
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhenghao Wang
Guo Chen
Jia Wang
Wuran Wei
spellingShingle Zhenghao Wang
Guo Chen
Jia Wang
Wuran Wei
Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Zhenghao Wang
Guo Chen
Jia Wang
Wuran Wei
author_sort Zhenghao Wang
title Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effect of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) on pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases (updated March 2020) were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of EMLA for patients that underwent ESWL. The search strategy and study selection process were managed according to the PRISMA statement. Six RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the results indicated that EMLA significantly reduced pain compared to the control group (RR = -2.98, 95% CI = -5.82 to -0.13, P = 0.04) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 57% (P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis showed that EMLA did not significantly reduce pain when the patients took an analgesic premedication (RR = -1.46, 95% CI = -5.89 to 2.98, P = 0.52) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 38% (P = 0.52). Conversely, studies without premedication showed a significant pain relief effect (RR = -4.08, 95% CI = -7.36 to -0.65, P = -0.80) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 48% (P = 0.14). Most studies showed there was no difference in the patient's need for analgesics. EMLA was effective for reducing pain during EWSL. However, this analgesic effect was limited and did not reduce the need for analgesics.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237783
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenghaowang eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsforpainreductionduringextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guochen eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsforpainreductionduringextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiawang eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsforpainreductionduringextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuranwei eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsforpainreductionduringextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1714813280336216064