Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)
Kobi re-evaluates the role of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) in eighteenth-century art history by focusing on his art publications rather than on the collections owned or compiled. She makes a valuable contribution to the knowledge about the social-cultural dimensions of his work – entailing the c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Art Historiography |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/vermeulen-review1.docx |
id |
doaj-e17efcfbb9ec4c04a40b5ee15c817f16 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e17efcfbb9ec4c04a40b5ee15c817f162020-11-25T00:40:28ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522018-06-011818IV1Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)Ingrid Vermeulen0Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamKobi re-evaluates the role of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) in eighteenth-century art history by focusing on his art publications rather than on the collections owned or compiled. She makes a valuable contribution to the knowledge about the social-cultural dimensions of his work – entailing the cult of the ‘honnete homme’ and the international scientific collaborations. About the scientific dimensions of his work she sheds light in particular on the process of knowledge creation from collection to several forms of publication, and on the ideologies that motivate scholarly production. Also several detailed case studies, such as those devoted to the carved gem of Michelangelo and the Bouchardon publications are valuable. Connoisseurship is hereby defined not only as the expression of refined artistic taste, but emphatically also as the instrument of scientific scrutiny. In this respect Kobi potentially contributes to the deconstruction of the myth of Mariette. Although this will not diminish the image of Mariette as a connoisseur, yet, it does change the understanding of his connoisseurship.https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/vermeulen-review1.docxMarietteconnoisseurshipart historiographysocial-cultural practicescientific knowledge creationmyth |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ingrid Vermeulen |
spellingShingle |
Ingrid Vermeulen Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) Journal of Art Historiography Mariette connoisseurship art historiography social-cultural practice scientific knowledge creation myth |
author_facet |
Ingrid Vermeulen |
author_sort |
Ingrid Vermeulen |
title |
Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) |
title_short |
Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) |
title_full |
Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) |
title_fullStr |
Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) |
title_sort |
review: challenging the myth of pierre-jean mariette (1694-1774) |
publisher |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham |
series |
Journal of Art Historiography |
issn |
2042-4752 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Kobi re-evaluates the role of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) in eighteenth-century art history by focusing on his art publications rather than on the collections owned or compiled. She makes a valuable contribution to the knowledge about the social-cultural dimensions of his work – entailing the cult of the ‘honnete homme’ and the international scientific collaborations. About the scientific dimensions of his work she sheds light in particular on the process of knowledge creation from collection to several forms of publication, and on the ideologies that motivate scholarly production. Also several detailed case studies, such as those devoted to the carved gem of Michelangelo and the Bouchardon publications are valuable. Connoisseurship is hereby defined not only as the expression of refined artistic taste, but emphatically also as the instrument of scientific scrutiny. In this respect Kobi potentially contributes to the deconstruction of the myth of Mariette. Although this will not diminish the image of Mariette as a connoisseur, yet, it does change the understanding of his connoisseurship. |
topic |
Mariette connoisseurship art historiography social-cultural practice scientific knowledge creation myth |
url |
https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/vermeulen-review1.docx |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ingridvermeulen reviewchallengingthemythofpierrejeanmariette16941774 |
_version_ |
1725289875172753408 |