Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)

Kobi re-evaluates the role of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) in eighteenth-century art history by focusing on his art publications rather than on the collections owned or compiled. She makes a valuable contribution to the knowledge about the social-cultural dimensions of his work – entailing the c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ingrid Vermeulen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Art History, University of Birmingham 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Art Historiography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/vermeulen-review1.docx
id doaj-e17efcfbb9ec4c04a40b5ee15c817f16
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e17efcfbb9ec4c04a40b5ee15c817f162020-11-25T00:40:28ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522018-06-011818IV1Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)Ingrid Vermeulen0Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamKobi re-evaluates the role of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) in eighteenth-century art history by focusing on his art publications rather than on the collections owned or compiled. She makes a valuable contribution to the knowledge about the social-cultural dimensions of his work – entailing the cult of the ‘honnete homme’ and the international scientific collaborations. About the scientific dimensions of his work she sheds light in particular on the process of knowledge creation from collection to several forms of publication, and on the ideologies that motivate scholarly production. Also several detailed case studies, such as those devoted to the carved gem of Michelangelo and the Bouchardon publications are valuable. Connoisseurship is hereby defined not only as the expression of refined artistic taste, but emphatically also as the instrument of scientific scrutiny. In this respect Kobi potentially contributes to the deconstruction of the myth of Mariette. Although this will not diminish the image of Mariette as a connoisseur, yet, it does change the understanding of his connoisseurship.https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/vermeulen-review1.docxMarietteconnoisseurshipart historiographysocial-cultural practicescientific knowledge creationmyth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ingrid Vermeulen
spellingShingle Ingrid Vermeulen
Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)
Journal of Art Historiography
Mariette
connoisseurship
art historiography
social-cultural practice
scientific knowledge creation
myth
author_facet Ingrid Vermeulen
author_sort Ingrid Vermeulen
title Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)
title_short Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)
title_full Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)
title_fullStr Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)
title_full_unstemmed Review: Challenging the myth of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774)
title_sort review: challenging the myth of pierre-jean mariette (1694-1774)
publisher Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
series Journal of Art Historiography
issn 2042-4752
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Kobi re-evaluates the role of Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) in eighteenth-century art history by focusing on his art publications rather than on the collections owned or compiled. She makes a valuable contribution to the knowledge about the social-cultural dimensions of his work – entailing the cult of the ‘honnete homme’ and the international scientific collaborations. About the scientific dimensions of his work she sheds light in particular on the process of knowledge creation from collection to several forms of publication, and on the ideologies that motivate scholarly production. Also several detailed case studies, such as those devoted to the carved gem of Michelangelo and the Bouchardon publications are valuable. Connoisseurship is hereby defined not only as the expression of refined artistic taste, but emphatically also as the instrument of scientific scrutiny. In this respect Kobi potentially contributes to the deconstruction of the myth of Mariette. Although this will not diminish the image of Mariette as a connoisseur, yet, it does change the understanding of his connoisseurship.
topic Mariette
connoisseurship
art historiography
social-cultural practice
scientific knowledge creation
myth
url https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/vermeulen-review1.docx
work_keys_str_mv AT ingridvermeulen reviewchallengingthemythofpierrejeanmariette16941774
_version_ 1725289875172753408