The Outcome of Vitrectomy in Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis

Introduction: Twenty years ago, the results of Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) were adapted worldwide as the standard management of endophthalmitis. The study suggested that there was no benefit of performing vitrectomy for acute postoperative endophthalmitis, unless for patients who presents...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sindy Boru Sembiring, Yulia Aziza, Gitalisa Andayani Adriono
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Journal of Retina 2018-07-01
Series:IJRETINA (International Journal of Retina)
Online Access:https://www.ijretina.com/index.php/ijretina/article/view/12
id doaj-e16ef8d65afd4872a3a2b6e5ee885210
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e16ef8d65afd4872a3a2b6e5ee8852102020-11-25T00:37:09ZengInternational Journal of RetinaIJRETINA (International Journal of Retina)2614-86842614-85362018-07-011112The Outcome of Vitrectomy in Acute Postoperative EndophthalmitisSindy Boru Sembiring0Yulia Aziza1Gitalisa Andayani Adriono2Sumatera Eye Hospital, MedanCipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, JakartaCipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, JakartaIntroduction: Twenty years ago, the results of Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) were adapted worldwide as the standard management of endophthalmitis. The study suggested that there was no benefit of performing vitrectomy for acute postoperative endophthalmitis, unless for patients who presents with visual acuity of light perception. However, vitrectomy with advanced technology and technique has been changed rapidly in the last decades; therefore, we need to reconsider its role. We conducted a study and the purpose of our study was to describe the indications for vitrectomy and the outcomes in acute postoperative endophthalmitis at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. Methods: Our study was a descriptive-retrospective case series. We reviewed clinical and microbiological records of all patients with clinical diagnosis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis who underwent vitrectomy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between 2007 and September 2015.  Presenting visual acuity, visual outcome and complications were described. Result: Our study was a descriptive-retrospective case series. We reviewed clinical and microbiological records of all patients with clinical diagnosis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis who underwent vitrectomy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between 2007 and September 2015.  Presenting visual acuity, visual outcome and complications were described. Conclusion: An eight-year experience has taught us that vitrectomy offers better treatment outcome in the group with visual acuity of hand movement than those who only had visual acuity of light perception.https://www.ijretina.com/index.php/ijretina/article/view/12
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sindy Boru Sembiring
Yulia Aziza
Gitalisa Andayani Adriono
spellingShingle Sindy Boru Sembiring
Yulia Aziza
Gitalisa Andayani Adriono
The Outcome of Vitrectomy in Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis
IJRETINA (International Journal of Retina)
author_facet Sindy Boru Sembiring
Yulia Aziza
Gitalisa Andayani Adriono
author_sort Sindy Boru Sembiring
title The Outcome of Vitrectomy in Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis
title_short The Outcome of Vitrectomy in Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis
title_full The Outcome of Vitrectomy in Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis
title_fullStr The Outcome of Vitrectomy in Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis
title_full_unstemmed The Outcome of Vitrectomy in Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis
title_sort outcome of vitrectomy in acute postoperative endophthalmitis
publisher International Journal of Retina
series IJRETINA (International Journal of Retina)
issn 2614-8684
2614-8536
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Introduction: Twenty years ago, the results of Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) were adapted worldwide as the standard management of endophthalmitis. The study suggested that there was no benefit of performing vitrectomy for acute postoperative endophthalmitis, unless for patients who presents with visual acuity of light perception. However, vitrectomy with advanced technology and technique has been changed rapidly in the last decades; therefore, we need to reconsider its role. We conducted a study and the purpose of our study was to describe the indications for vitrectomy and the outcomes in acute postoperative endophthalmitis at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. Methods: Our study was a descriptive-retrospective case series. We reviewed clinical and microbiological records of all patients with clinical diagnosis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis who underwent vitrectomy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between 2007 and September 2015.  Presenting visual acuity, visual outcome and complications were described. Result: Our study was a descriptive-retrospective case series. We reviewed clinical and microbiological records of all patients with clinical diagnosis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis who underwent vitrectomy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between 2007 and September 2015.  Presenting visual acuity, visual outcome and complications were described. Conclusion: An eight-year experience has taught us that vitrectomy offers better treatment outcome in the group with visual acuity of hand movement than those who only had visual acuity of light perception.
url https://www.ijretina.com/index.php/ijretina/article/view/12
work_keys_str_mv AT sindyborusembiring theoutcomeofvitrectomyinacutepostoperativeendophthalmitis
AT yuliaaziza theoutcomeofvitrectomyinacutepostoperativeendophthalmitis
AT gitalisaandayaniadriono theoutcomeofvitrectomyinacutepostoperativeendophthalmitis
AT sindyborusembiring outcomeofvitrectomyinacutepostoperativeendophthalmitis
AT yuliaaziza outcomeofvitrectomyinacutepostoperativeendophthalmitis
AT gitalisaandayaniadriono outcomeofvitrectomyinacutepostoperativeendophthalmitis
_version_ 1725302278213074944