The correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – Part 2: Long-term trends

Using lag-correlation function analysis, the correlation coefficient at zero lag (<I>r</I><sub>0</sub>), the maximum (<I>r</I><sub>m</sub>) and the corresponding lag time (<I>L</I><sub>m</sub>) between solar (<I>R</I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Z. L. Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-08-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1341/2011/angeo-29-1341-2011.pdf
id doaj-e16399cacdd1494d86d7450ef150d879
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e16399cacdd1494d86d7450ef150d8792020-11-24T21:33:46ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762011-08-01291341134810.5194/angeo-29-1341-2011The correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – Part 2: Long-term trendsZ. L. Du0Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, ChinaUsing lag-correlation function analysis, the correlation coefficient at zero lag (<I>r</I><sub>0</sub>), the maximum (<I>r</I><sub>m</sub>) and the corresponding lag time (<I>L</I><sub>m</sub>) between solar (<I>R</I><sub>z</sub>) and geomagnetic (<I>aa</I>) activity for a 528-month (44-year) running time window are shown to vary in a declining, declining and rising secular trend, respectively, before 1958. However, these trends changed since 1958 with a rising secular trend in both <I>r</I><sub>0</sub> and <I>r</I><sub>m</sub> and without a significant trend in <I>L</I><sub>m</sub>, probably related to a periodicity longer than 140 years. An odd-numbered solar cycle tends to show a higher correlation and a shorter lag time between <I>R</I><sub>z</sub> and <I>aa</I> than the previous even-numbered one, suggesting a 2-cycle periodicity superimposed on secular trends. An even-numbered Hale cycle tends to show a higher correlation and a shorter lag time between <I>R</I><sub>z</sub> and <I>aa</I> than the previous odd-numbered one, suggesting a 4-cycle periodicity superimposed on secular trends. The variations in the correlations may be related to the non-linearity between <I>R</I><sub>z</sub> and <I>aa</I>, and the decreasing trend in the correlation (<I>r</I><sub>0</sub>) is not exclusively caused by the increasing trend in the lag time of <I>aa</I> to <I>R</I><sub>z</sub>. These results represent an observational constraint on solar-dynamo models and can help us gain a better understanding of the long-term evolution of solar activities. In applications, therefore, cautions must be taken when using the correlation for molding the dynamical process of the Sun and for predicting solar activities.https://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1341/2011/angeo-29-1341-2011.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Z. L. Du
spellingShingle Z. L. Du
The correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – Part 2: Long-term trends
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet Z. L. Du
author_sort Z. L. Du
title The correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – Part 2: Long-term trends
title_short The correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – Part 2: Long-term trends
title_full The correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – Part 2: Long-term trends
title_fullStr The correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – Part 2: Long-term trends
title_full_unstemmed The correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – Part 2: Long-term trends
title_sort correlation between solar and geomagnetic activity – part 2: long-term trends
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2011-08-01
description Using lag-correlation function analysis, the correlation coefficient at zero lag (<I>r</I><sub>0</sub>), the maximum (<I>r</I><sub>m</sub>) and the corresponding lag time (<I>L</I><sub>m</sub>) between solar (<I>R</I><sub>z</sub>) and geomagnetic (<I>aa</I>) activity for a 528-month (44-year) running time window are shown to vary in a declining, declining and rising secular trend, respectively, before 1958. However, these trends changed since 1958 with a rising secular trend in both <I>r</I><sub>0</sub> and <I>r</I><sub>m</sub> and without a significant trend in <I>L</I><sub>m</sub>, probably related to a periodicity longer than 140 years. An odd-numbered solar cycle tends to show a higher correlation and a shorter lag time between <I>R</I><sub>z</sub> and <I>aa</I> than the previous even-numbered one, suggesting a 2-cycle periodicity superimposed on secular trends. An even-numbered Hale cycle tends to show a higher correlation and a shorter lag time between <I>R</I><sub>z</sub> and <I>aa</I> than the previous odd-numbered one, suggesting a 4-cycle periodicity superimposed on secular trends. The variations in the correlations may be related to the non-linearity between <I>R</I><sub>z</sub> and <I>aa</I>, and the decreasing trend in the correlation (<I>r</I><sub>0</sub>) is not exclusively caused by the increasing trend in the lag time of <I>aa</I> to <I>R</I><sub>z</sub>. These results represent an observational constraint on solar-dynamo models and can help us gain a better understanding of the long-term evolution of solar activities. In applications, therefore, cautions must be taken when using the correlation for molding the dynamical process of the Sun and for predicting solar activities.
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1341/2011/angeo-29-1341-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zldu thecorrelationbetweensolarandgeomagneticactivitypart2longtermtrends
AT zldu correlationbetweensolarandgeomagneticactivitypart2longtermtrends
_version_ 1725952212531675136