A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação

This paper analyses the argumentative strategy of the ninth chapter of the treatise De Interpretatione in the light of Aristotle's Rhetoric. The subject of the ‘future events’ developed in chapter IX brings up themes that are proper not only to philosophical thought, but also to political prac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luisa Buarque
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Universidade de São Paulo (USP) 2021-05-01
Series:Revista de Filosofia Antiga
Online Access:https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185986
id doaj-e15de7c7654d45fdbeb117bc9347a67a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e15de7c7654d45fdbeb117bc9347a67a2021-06-24T15:53:07ZdeuUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Revista de Filosofia Antiga1981-94712021-05-0115110.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i1p190-206A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da InterpretaçãoLuisa Buarque0Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro This paper analyses the argumentative strategy of the ninth chapter of the treatise De Interpretatione in the light of Aristotle's Rhetoric. The subject of the ‘future events’ developed in chapter IX brings up themes that are proper not only to philosophical thought, but also to political practice, forensic rhetoric, deliberative rhetoric and even tragic poetry. In this paper, it is argued that Aristotle uses the dialectical method and certain rhetorical techniques to touch the various discussions related to the subject addressed. He erects a hypothetical adversary and a thesis to refute, condensing some positions that were probably scattered in the most diverse textual and oratory sources of his time. Moreover, he builds the thesis of his hypothetical opponent from premises established in previous chapters of his own treatise. With this, he can simulate the defense of his opponent's thesis before demolishing it. Thus, according to the hypothesis defended here, the philosopher does not in fact commit himself to the arguments presented between 18a35 and 18b25, but only simulates the defense of the reasoning which he will soon refute. In addition, it is also concluded that chapter IX is part of the argumentative chain of the treatise, having as a peculiar characteristic, not the theme or nature of the arguments exposed, but the rhetorical method it employs. https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185986
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luisa Buarque
spellingShingle Luisa Buarque
A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação
Revista de Filosofia Antiga
author_facet Luisa Buarque
author_sort Luisa Buarque
title A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação
title_short A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação
title_full A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação
title_fullStr A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação
title_full_unstemmed A retórica do capítulo IX do tratado Da Interpretação
title_sort retórica do capítulo ix do tratado da interpretação
publisher Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
series Revista de Filosofia Antiga
issn 1981-9471
publishDate 2021-05-01
description This paper analyses the argumentative strategy of the ninth chapter of the treatise De Interpretatione in the light of Aristotle's Rhetoric. The subject of the ‘future events’ developed in chapter IX brings up themes that are proper not only to philosophical thought, but also to political practice, forensic rhetoric, deliberative rhetoric and even tragic poetry. In this paper, it is argued that Aristotle uses the dialectical method and certain rhetorical techniques to touch the various discussions related to the subject addressed. He erects a hypothetical adversary and a thesis to refute, condensing some positions that were probably scattered in the most diverse textual and oratory sources of his time. Moreover, he builds the thesis of his hypothetical opponent from premises established in previous chapters of his own treatise. With this, he can simulate the defense of his opponent's thesis before demolishing it. Thus, according to the hypothesis defended here, the philosopher does not in fact commit himself to the arguments presented between 18a35 and 18b25, but only simulates the defense of the reasoning which he will soon refute. In addition, it is also concluded that chapter IX is part of the argumentative chain of the treatise, having as a peculiar characteristic, not the theme or nature of the arguments exposed, but the rhetorical method it employs.
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185986
work_keys_str_mv AT luisabuarque aretoricadocapituloixdotratadodainterpretacao
AT luisabuarque retoricadocapituloixdotratadodainterpretacao
_version_ 1721361134678704128