Carbon Fiber Biocompatibility for Implants

Carbon fibers have multiple potential advantages in developing high-strength biomaterials with a density close to bone for better stress transfer and electrical properties that enhance tissue formation. As a breakthrough example in biomaterials, a 1.5 mm diameter bisphenol-epoxy/carbon-fiber-reinfor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard Petersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-01-01
Series:Fibers
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-6439/4/1/1
id doaj-e15672c7633c4489a3b262996aee5324
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e15672c7633c4489a3b262996aee53242020-11-25T01:05:58ZengMDPI AGFibers2079-64392016-01-0141110.3390/fib4010001fib4010001Carbon Fiber Biocompatibility for ImplantsRichard Petersen0Departments of Biomaterials and Restorative Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USACarbon fibers have multiple potential advantages in developing high-strength biomaterials with a density close to bone for better stress transfer and electrical properties that enhance tissue formation. As a breakthrough example in biomaterials, a 1.5 mm diameter bisphenol-epoxy/carbon-fiber-reinforced composite rod was compared for two weeks in a rat tibia model with a similar 1.5 mm diameter titanium-6-4 alloy screw manufactured to retain bone implants. Results showed that carbon-fiber-reinforced composite stimulated osseointegration inside the tibia bone marrow measured as percent bone area (PBA) to a great extent when compared to the titanium-6-4 alloy at statistically significant levels. PBA increased significantly with the carbon-fiber composite over the titanium-6-4 alloy for distances from the implant surfaces of 0.1 mm at 77.7% vs. 19.3% (p < 10−8) and 0.8 mm at 41.6% vs. 19.5% (p < 10−4), respectively. The review focuses on carbon fiber properties that increased PBA for enhanced implant osseointegration. Carbon fibers acting as polymer coated electrically conducting micro-biocircuits appear to provide a biocompatible semi-antioxidant property to remove damaging electron free radicals from the surrounding implant surface. Further, carbon fibers by removing excess electrons produced from the cellular mitochondrial electron transport chain during periods of hypoxia perhaps stimulate bone cell recruitment by free-radical chemotactic influences. In addition, well-studied bioorganic cell actin carbon fiber growth would appear to interface in close contact with the carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implant. Resulting subsequent actin carbon fiber/implant carbon fiber contacts then could help in discharging the electron biological overloads through electrochemical gradients to lower negative charges and lower concentration.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-6439/4/1/1carbon fiberconductivityresistivitybiocompatibleimplant
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard Petersen
spellingShingle Richard Petersen
Carbon Fiber Biocompatibility for Implants
Fibers
carbon fiber
conductivity
resistivity
biocompatible
implant
author_facet Richard Petersen
author_sort Richard Petersen
title Carbon Fiber Biocompatibility for Implants
title_short Carbon Fiber Biocompatibility for Implants
title_full Carbon Fiber Biocompatibility for Implants
title_fullStr Carbon Fiber Biocompatibility for Implants
title_full_unstemmed Carbon Fiber Biocompatibility for Implants
title_sort carbon fiber biocompatibility for implants
publisher MDPI AG
series Fibers
issn 2079-6439
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Carbon fibers have multiple potential advantages in developing high-strength biomaterials with a density close to bone for better stress transfer and electrical properties that enhance tissue formation. As a breakthrough example in biomaterials, a 1.5 mm diameter bisphenol-epoxy/carbon-fiber-reinforced composite rod was compared for two weeks in a rat tibia model with a similar 1.5 mm diameter titanium-6-4 alloy screw manufactured to retain bone implants. Results showed that carbon-fiber-reinforced composite stimulated osseointegration inside the tibia bone marrow measured as percent bone area (PBA) to a great extent when compared to the titanium-6-4 alloy at statistically significant levels. PBA increased significantly with the carbon-fiber composite over the titanium-6-4 alloy for distances from the implant surfaces of 0.1 mm at 77.7% vs. 19.3% (p < 10−8) and 0.8 mm at 41.6% vs. 19.5% (p < 10−4), respectively. The review focuses on carbon fiber properties that increased PBA for enhanced implant osseointegration. Carbon fibers acting as polymer coated electrically conducting micro-biocircuits appear to provide a biocompatible semi-antioxidant property to remove damaging electron free radicals from the surrounding implant surface. Further, carbon fibers by removing excess electrons produced from the cellular mitochondrial electron transport chain during periods of hypoxia perhaps stimulate bone cell recruitment by free-radical chemotactic influences. In addition, well-studied bioorganic cell actin carbon fiber growth would appear to interface in close contact with the carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implant. Resulting subsequent actin carbon fiber/implant carbon fiber contacts then could help in discharging the electron biological overloads through electrochemical gradients to lower negative charges and lower concentration.
topic carbon fiber
conductivity
resistivity
biocompatible
implant
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-6439/4/1/1
work_keys_str_mv AT richardpetersen carbonfiberbiocompatibilityforimplants
_version_ 1725192160528039936