A history of the concept of time of concentration

<p>The concept of time of concentration in the analysis of catchment responses dates back over 150 years to the introduction of the rational method. Since then it has been used in a variety of ways in the formulation of both unit hydrograph and distributed catchment models. It is normally disc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: K. J. Beven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-05-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/24/2655/2020/hess-24-2655-2020.pdf
id doaj-e14c8746c0bd426da898ddafbbded542
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e14c8746c0bd426da898ddafbbded5422020-11-25T03:09:20ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382020-05-01242655267010.5194/hess-24-2655-2020A history of the concept of time of concentrationK. J. Beven<p>The concept of time of concentration in the analysis of catchment responses dates back over 150 years to the introduction of the rational method. Since then it has been used in a variety of ways in the formulation of both unit hydrograph and distributed catchment models. It is normally discussed in terms of the velocity of flow of a water particle from the furthest part of a catchment to the outlet. This is also the basis for the definition in the International Glossary of Hydrology. While conceptually simple, this definition is, however, wrong when applied to catchment responses where, in terms of how surface and subsurface flows produce hydrographs, it is more correct to discuss and teach the concept based on celerities and time to equilibrium. While this has been recognized since the 1960s, some recent papers and texts remain confused over the definition and use of the time of concentration concept. The paper sets out the history of its use and clarifies its relationship with time to equilibrium but suggests that both terms are not really useful in explaining hydrological responses. An Appendix is included that quantifies the differences between the definitions of response times for subsurface and surface flows under simple assumptions that might be useful in teaching.</p>https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/24/2655/2020/hess-24-2655-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. J. Beven
spellingShingle K. J. Beven
A history of the concept of time of concentration
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet K. J. Beven
author_sort K. J. Beven
title A history of the concept of time of concentration
title_short A history of the concept of time of concentration
title_full A history of the concept of time of concentration
title_fullStr A history of the concept of time of concentration
title_full_unstemmed A history of the concept of time of concentration
title_sort history of the concept of time of concentration
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2020-05-01
description <p>The concept of time of concentration in the analysis of catchment responses dates back over 150 years to the introduction of the rational method. Since then it has been used in a variety of ways in the formulation of both unit hydrograph and distributed catchment models. It is normally discussed in terms of the velocity of flow of a water particle from the furthest part of a catchment to the outlet. This is also the basis for the definition in the International Glossary of Hydrology. While conceptually simple, this definition is, however, wrong when applied to catchment responses where, in terms of how surface and subsurface flows produce hydrographs, it is more correct to discuss and teach the concept based on celerities and time to equilibrium. While this has been recognized since the 1960s, some recent papers and texts remain confused over the definition and use of the time of concentration concept. The paper sets out the history of its use and clarifies its relationship with time to equilibrium but suggests that both terms are not really useful in explaining hydrological responses. An Appendix is included that quantifies the differences between the definitions of response times for subsurface and surface flows under simple assumptions that might be useful in teaching.</p>
url https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/24/2655/2020/hess-24-2655-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kjbeven ahistoryoftheconceptoftimeofconcentration
AT kjbeven historyoftheconceptoftimeofconcentration
_version_ 1724663253563342848