ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods
This article has two objectives. First is the presentation of an updated model of conversation analysis designed and tested in a specific cooperation situation. Secondly, its validation by mixed methods combining a qualitative study based on user-centered methods and a quantitative analysis using in...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Methods in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300217 |
id |
doaj-e14272b2c4894e59905d3c4530e8fc36 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e14272b2c4894e59905d3c4530e8fc362021-02-27T04:40:22ZengElsevierMethods in Psychology2590-26012020-12-013100034ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methodsD. Graeff0V. Lespinet-Najib1T. Letouzé2C. Vennin3J.M. André4Equipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, France; Corresponding author.Equipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, FranceEquipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, FranceEquipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, France; Onepoint Bordeaux, 28 Avenue Léonard de Vinci, 33600, Pessac, FranceEquipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, FranceThis article has two objectives. First is the presentation of an updated model of conversation analysis designed and tested in a specific cooperation situation. Secondly, its validation by mixed methods combining a qualitative study based on user-centered methods and a quantitative analysis using interrater agreements. The first highlights the importance of adapting the model to the cooperation task by adding or merging typology categories. The second reveals guidelines for the use and reliability of the model based on rater skills. Interrater agreements show that an expert could use our model alone whereas novices should use pair rating for satisfactory results.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300217Dyad cooperationConversational exchangesTemporal dynamicsCollaborative cogniticsMixed methodsKnowledge eXchange |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D. Graeff V. Lespinet-Najib T. Letouzé C. Vennin J.M. André |
spellingShingle |
D. Graeff V. Lespinet-Najib T. Letouzé C. Vennin J.M. André ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods Methods in Psychology Dyad cooperation Conversational exchanges Temporal dynamics Collaborative cognitics Mixed methods Knowledge eXchange |
author_facet |
D. Graeff V. Lespinet-Najib T. Letouzé C. Vennin J.M. André |
author_sort |
D. Graeff |
title |
ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods |
title_short |
ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods |
title_full |
ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods |
title_fullStr |
ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods |
title_sort |
acdc: a new model for the analysis of communication in dyad cooperation validated by mixed methods |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Methods in Psychology |
issn |
2590-2601 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
This article has two objectives. First is the presentation of an updated model of conversation analysis designed and tested in a specific cooperation situation. Secondly, its validation by mixed methods combining a qualitative study based on user-centered methods and a quantitative analysis using interrater agreements. The first highlights the importance of adapting the model to the cooperation task by adding or merging typology categories. The second reveals guidelines for the use and reliability of the model based on rater skills. Interrater agreements show that an expert could use our model alone whereas novices should use pair rating for satisfactory results. |
topic |
Dyad cooperation Conversational exchanges Temporal dynamics Collaborative cognitics Mixed methods Knowledge eXchange |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300217 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dgraeff acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods AT vlespinetnajib acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods AT tletouze acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods AT cvennin acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods AT jmandre acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods |
_version_ |
1724248431406350336 |