ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods

This article has two objectives. First is the presentation of an updated model of conversation analysis designed and tested in a specific cooperation situation. Secondly, its validation by mixed methods combining a qualitative study based on user-centered methods and a quantitative analysis using in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Graeff, V. Lespinet-Najib, T. Letouzé, C. Vennin, J.M. André
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Methods in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300217
id doaj-e14272b2c4894e59905d3c4530e8fc36
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e14272b2c4894e59905d3c4530e8fc362021-02-27T04:40:22ZengElsevierMethods in Psychology2590-26012020-12-013100034ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methodsD. Graeff0V. Lespinet-Najib1T. Letouzé2C. Vennin3J.M. André4Equipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, France; Corresponding author.Equipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, FranceEquipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, FranceEquipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, France; Onepoint Bordeaux, 28 Avenue Léonard de Vinci, 33600, Pessac, FranceEquipe CIH, Laboratoire IMS (UMR CNRS 5218) ENSC-Bordeaux INP, 109 Avenue Roul, 33400, Talence, FranceThis article has two objectives. First is the presentation of an updated model of conversation analysis designed and tested in a specific cooperation situation. Secondly, its validation by mixed methods combining a qualitative study based on user-centered methods and a quantitative analysis using interrater agreements. The first highlights the importance of adapting the model to the cooperation task by adding or merging typology categories. The second reveals guidelines for the use and reliability of the model based on rater skills. Interrater agreements show that an expert could use our model alone whereas novices should use pair rating for satisfactory results.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300217Dyad cooperationConversational exchangesTemporal dynamicsCollaborative cogniticsMixed methodsKnowledge eXchange
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Graeff
V. Lespinet-Najib
T. Letouzé
C. Vennin
J.M. André
spellingShingle D. Graeff
V. Lespinet-Najib
T. Letouzé
C. Vennin
J.M. André
ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods
Methods in Psychology
Dyad cooperation
Conversational exchanges
Temporal dynamics
Collaborative cognitics
Mixed methods
Knowledge eXchange
author_facet D. Graeff
V. Lespinet-Najib
T. Letouzé
C. Vennin
J.M. André
author_sort D. Graeff
title ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods
title_short ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods
title_full ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods
title_fullStr ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods
title_full_unstemmed ACDC: A new model for the Analysis of Communication in Dyad Cooperation validated by mixed methods
title_sort acdc: a new model for the analysis of communication in dyad cooperation validated by mixed methods
publisher Elsevier
series Methods in Psychology
issn 2590-2601
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This article has two objectives. First is the presentation of an updated model of conversation analysis designed and tested in a specific cooperation situation. Secondly, its validation by mixed methods combining a qualitative study based on user-centered methods and a quantitative analysis using interrater agreements. The first highlights the importance of adapting the model to the cooperation task by adding or merging typology categories. The second reveals guidelines for the use and reliability of the model based on rater skills. Interrater agreements show that an expert could use our model alone whereas novices should use pair rating for satisfactory results.
topic Dyad cooperation
Conversational exchanges
Temporal dynamics
Collaborative cognitics
Mixed methods
Knowledge eXchange
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260120300217
work_keys_str_mv AT dgraeff acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods
AT vlespinetnajib acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods
AT tletouze acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods
AT cvennin acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods
AT jmandre acdcanewmodelfortheanalysisofcommunicationindyadcooperationvalidatedbymixedmethods
_version_ 1724248431406350336