Local Food Campaign in a Globalization Context: A Systematic Review

As a basic commodity, food has undergone thorough globalization, with the global food market totaling 1392 billion USD in 2019. Despite such a great amount of global food trade, the idea of favouring the consumption of local food, or local food campaigns, has won ever growing attention and advocacy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Susan (Sixue) Jia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7487
id doaj-e12633b0bc0b4738ae3845117a70fb5d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e12633b0bc0b4738ae3845117a70fb5d2021-07-15T15:47:58ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-07-01137487748710.3390/su13137487Local Food Campaign in a Globalization Context: A Systematic ReviewSusan (Sixue) Jia0School of Finance and Business, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, ChinaAs a basic commodity, food has undergone thorough globalization, with the global food market totaling 1392 billion USD in 2019. Despite such a great amount of global food trade, the idea of favouring the consumption of local food, or local food campaigns, has won ever growing attention and advocacy in recent years as an effort to enhance social and environmental sustainability. This systematic review study draws wisdom from the extant literature and provides critical thinking on how local food differs from non-local food and whether the two are more antagonistic or more complementary. Results suggest that although the term “local food” has hardly been clearly defined, it is possible to accommodate different opinions in a set of common constructs in Eriksen’s “three domains of proximity”. Regarding the strengths of local food, researchers agree more on its strong personal connection, distinctive culture, and high quality, but less on its supporting local economy, reduced energy consumption, and environmental friendliness. Meanwhile, local food has its current weaknesses in terms of higher price and unsuccessful information communication; however, these are not without solutions. Overall, while food localization and globalization differ in purpose, they can well co-exist, promote collaboration rather than confrontation, and together accelerate the sustainable growth of the food market.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7487local foodglobalizationproximitystrengthweaknessco-exist
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susan (Sixue) Jia
spellingShingle Susan (Sixue) Jia
Local Food Campaign in a Globalization Context: A Systematic Review
Sustainability
local food
globalization
proximity
strength
weakness
co-exist
author_facet Susan (Sixue) Jia
author_sort Susan (Sixue) Jia
title Local Food Campaign in a Globalization Context: A Systematic Review
title_short Local Food Campaign in a Globalization Context: A Systematic Review
title_full Local Food Campaign in a Globalization Context: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Local Food Campaign in a Globalization Context: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Local Food Campaign in a Globalization Context: A Systematic Review
title_sort local food campaign in a globalization context: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-07-01
description As a basic commodity, food has undergone thorough globalization, with the global food market totaling 1392 billion USD in 2019. Despite such a great amount of global food trade, the idea of favouring the consumption of local food, or local food campaigns, has won ever growing attention and advocacy in recent years as an effort to enhance social and environmental sustainability. This systematic review study draws wisdom from the extant literature and provides critical thinking on how local food differs from non-local food and whether the two are more antagonistic or more complementary. Results suggest that although the term “local food” has hardly been clearly defined, it is possible to accommodate different opinions in a set of common constructs in Eriksen’s “three domains of proximity”. Regarding the strengths of local food, researchers agree more on its strong personal connection, distinctive culture, and high quality, but less on its supporting local economy, reduced energy consumption, and environmental friendliness. Meanwhile, local food has its current weaknesses in terms of higher price and unsuccessful information communication; however, these are not without solutions. Overall, while food localization and globalization differ in purpose, they can well co-exist, promote collaboration rather than confrontation, and together accelerate the sustainable growth of the food market.
topic local food
globalization
proximity
strength
weakness
co-exist
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7487
work_keys_str_mv AT susansixuejia localfoodcampaigninaglobalizationcontextasystematicreview
_version_ 1721298235851538432