Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature

Bowel perforation by a peritoneal catheter (BPPC) is a serious complication after ventriculoperitoneal shunting, with high mortality and morbidity rates. This patient presented with scalp ulceration over the shunt valve at the retromastoid region 26 years after shunt placement. During revision, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gmeiner Matthias, Thomae Wolfgang, Tolino Marco, Senker Wolfgang, Gruber Andreas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2020-02-01
Series:Open Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2020-0011
id doaj-e120c5d37aed48f5876c91fb6ccf93f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e120c5d37aed48f5876c91fb6ccf93f52021-10-02T19:23:59ZengDe GruyterOpen Medicine2391-54632020-02-01151717510.1515/med-2020-0011med-2020-0011Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literatureGmeiner Matthias0Thomae Wolfgang1Tolino Marco2Senker Wolfgang3Gruber Andreas4Department of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg 15A, 4020Linz, AustriaKepler University Hospital, Neuromed Campus, Department of Neurosurgery, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg 15A, 4020Linz, AustriaKepler University Hospital, Neuromed Campus, Institute of Neuroradiology, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg 15A, 4020Linz, AustriaKepler University Hospital, Neuromed Campus, Department of Neurosurgery, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg 15A, 4020Linz, AustriaJohannes Kepler University (JKU) Linz, Altenbergerstraße 69, 4040, Linz, AustriaBowel perforation by a peritoneal catheter (BPPC) is a serious complication after ventriculoperitoneal shunting, with high mortality and morbidity rates. This patient presented with scalp ulceration over the shunt valve at the retromastoid region 26 years after shunt placement. During revision, the catheter distal to the valve was divided in the clavicular region. As there was no cerebrospinal fluid drainage, we decided to remove the ventricular catheter and valve. The ulceration was debrided and primarily closed. Distal to the clavicle, the disconnected peritoneal catheter was encased in a fibrous, calcified tunnel. To avoid piecemeal resection with multiple incisions, the catheter was not retrieved. Two years later, the patient presented with an abscess and pus draining from the clavicular wound. Cultures were positive for enteric bacteria. BPPC with retrograde spread of infection was suspected, and abdominal computed tomography confirmed perforation. We removed the disconnected catheter, but the perforation site could not be detected during laparotomy. The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics and recovered without complications. To minimize complications, abandoned catheters should be avoided. Otherwise, patients unnecessarily have a life-long risk of developing abdominal complications. In patients with abandoned catheters and severe abdominal symptoms, BPPC is an important differential diagnosis.https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2020-0011hydrocephalusabdominal complicationsabandoned cathetersbowel perforation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gmeiner Matthias
Thomae Wolfgang
Tolino Marco
Senker Wolfgang
Gruber Andreas
spellingShingle Gmeiner Matthias
Thomae Wolfgang
Tolino Marco
Senker Wolfgang
Gruber Andreas
Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature
Open Medicine
hydrocephalus
abdominal complications
abandoned catheters
bowel perforation
author_facet Gmeiner Matthias
Thomae Wolfgang
Tolino Marco
Senker Wolfgang
Gruber Andreas
author_sort Gmeiner Matthias
title Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature
title_short Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature
title_full Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature
title_fullStr Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature
title_sort bowel perforation after ventriculoperitoneal-shunt placement: case report and review of the literature
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Medicine
issn 2391-5463
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Bowel perforation by a peritoneal catheter (BPPC) is a serious complication after ventriculoperitoneal shunting, with high mortality and morbidity rates. This patient presented with scalp ulceration over the shunt valve at the retromastoid region 26 years after shunt placement. During revision, the catheter distal to the valve was divided in the clavicular region. As there was no cerebrospinal fluid drainage, we decided to remove the ventricular catheter and valve. The ulceration was debrided and primarily closed. Distal to the clavicle, the disconnected peritoneal catheter was encased in a fibrous, calcified tunnel. To avoid piecemeal resection with multiple incisions, the catheter was not retrieved. Two years later, the patient presented with an abscess and pus draining from the clavicular wound. Cultures were positive for enteric bacteria. BPPC with retrograde spread of infection was suspected, and abdominal computed tomography confirmed perforation. We removed the disconnected catheter, but the perforation site could not be detected during laparotomy. The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics and recovered without complications. To minimize complications, abandoned catheters should be avoided. Otherwise, patients unnecessarily have a life-long risk of developing abdominal complications. In patients with abandoned catheters and severe abdominal symptoms, BPPC is an important differential diagnosis.
topic hydrocephalus
abdominal complications
abandoned catheters
bowel perforation
url https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2020-0011
work_keys_str_mv AT gmeinermatthias bowelperforationafterventriculoperitonealshuntplacementcasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT thomaewolfgang bowelperforationafterventriculoperitonealshuntplacementcasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT tolinomarco bowelperforationafterventriculoperitonealshuntplacementcasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT senkerwolfgang bowelperforationafterventriculoperitonealshuntplacementcasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT gruberandreas bowelperforationafterventriculoperitonealshuntplacementcasereportandreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1716846939983577088