Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital

Introduction: A critical result of an investigation is considered a representation of a pathophysiological state deemed to be high-risk or life-threatening for the patient. Therefore, such results should be addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. Unfortunately, routine closed-chart audits su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wania Imtiaz, Khawaja Shehryar Nasir, Fareeha Kanwal, Sheeba Saqib, Haroon Hafeez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shaukat Khanum Memorial Trust 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/419
id doaj-e11a5b0ef6f943919decf97216439310
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e11a5b0ef6f943919decf972164393102021-10-02T17:39:40ZengShaukat Khanum Memorial TrustJournal of Cancer and Allied Specialties2411-989X2021-06-017210.37029/jcas.v7i2.419Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer HospitalWania Imtiaz0Khawaja Shehryar Nasir1Fareeha Kanwal2Sheeba Saqib3Haroon Hafeez4Department of Internal Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PakistanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PakistanDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PakistanDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PakistanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan Introduction: A critical result of an investigation is considered a representation of a pathophysiological state deemed to be high-risk or life-threatening for the patient. Therefore, such results should be addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. Unfortunately, routine closed-chart audits suggested that the compliance of physicians in documenting critical alerts in patient notes was poor. This prompted the hospital to conduct a continuous quality improvement (CQI) project to improve the physicians' compliance. Materials and Methods: A cause-and-effect analysis was conducted using a fishbone diagram to identify the reasons for poor compliance. Based on the analysis, several modifications were made, including, but not limited to, hospital-wide educational sessions on the standard operating procedures of receiving and documenting critical alerts for the physicians, daily audit of critical alerts to review the appropriateness of documentation, and introduction of a new module in the hospital electronic medical record to acknowledge and document receiving critical alerts. Results: Before implementing the strategies to improve physicians' documentation compliance, the average compliance rate was 57 % in April 2020, and the median compliance rate was 52 % (January 2020 - April 2020). However, afterwards, within a couple of months of implementing changes, the average compliance rate increased to 88 %. This improvement was sustained for the next eight months (median of 89 %). Conclusion: This study found that CQI approach can be used to improve the compliance of the physicians for appropriately and timely documenting critical alerts, in this case, by continued education and training process and incorporating changes into the electronic hospital information system. https://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/419Continuous quality improvementcritical alertsdocumentationinvestigationsoptimisation of care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wania Imtiaz
Khawaja Shehryar Nasir
Fareeha Kanwal
Sheeba Saqib
Haroon Hafeez
spellingShingle Wania Imtiaz
Khawaja Shehryar Nasir
Fareeha Kanwal
Sheeba Saqib
Haroon Hafeez
Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital
Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties
Continuous quality improvement
critical alerts
documentation
investigations
optimisation of care
author_facet Wania Imtiaz
Khawaja Shehryar Nasir
Fareeha Kanwal
Sheeba Saqib
Haroon Hafeez
author_sort Wania Imtiaz
title Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital
title_short Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital
title_full Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital
title_fullStr Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital
title_sort improving compliance of physicians in reporting and documenting critical alerts in a cancer hospital
publisher Shaukat Khanum Memorial Trust
series Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties
issn 2411-989X
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Introduction: A critical result of an investigation is considered a representation of a pathophysiological state deemed to be high-risk or life-threatening for the patient. Therefore, such results should be addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. Unfortunately, routine closed-chart audits suggested that the compliance of physicians in documenting critical alerts in patient notes was poor. This prompted the hospital to conduct a continuous quality improvement (CQI) project to improve the physicians' compliance. Materials and Methods: A cause-and-effect analysis was conducted using a fishbone diagram to identify the reasons for poor compliance. Based on the analysis, several modifications were made, including, but not limited to, hospital-wide educational sessions on the standard operating procedures of receiving and documenting critical alerts for the physicians, daily audit of critical alerts to review the appropriateness of documentation, and introduction of a new module in the hospital electronic medical record to acknowledge and document receiving critical alerts. Results: Before implementing the strategies to improve physicians' documentation compliance, the average compliance rate was 57 % in April 2020, and the median compliance rate was 52 % (January 2020 - April 2020). However, afterwards, within a couple of months of implementing changes, the average compliance rate increased to 88 %. This improvement was sustained for the next eight months (median of 89 %). Conclusion: This study found that CQI approach can be used to improve the compliance of the physicians for appropriately and timely documenting critical alerts, in this case, by continued education and training process and incorporating changes into the electronic hospital information system.
topic Continuous quality improvement
critical alerts
documentation
investigations
optimisation of care
url https://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/419
work_keys_str_mv AT waniaimtiaz improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital
AT khawajashehryarnasir improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital
AT fareehakanwal improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital
AT sheebasaqib improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital
AT haroonhafeez improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital
_version_ 1716850742785998848