Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital
Introduction: A critical result of an investigation is considered a representation of a pathophysiological state deemed to be high-risk or life-threatening for the patient. Therefore, such results should be addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. Unfortunately, routine closed-chart audits su...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Trust
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/419 |
id |
doaj-e11a5b0ef6f943919decf97216439310 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e11a5b0ef6f943919decf972164393102021-10-02T17:39:40ZengShaukat Khanum Memorial TrustJournal of Cancer and Allied Specialties2411-989X2021-06-017210.37029/jcas.v7i2.419Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer HospitalWania Imtiaz0Khawaja Shehryar Nasir1Fareeha Kanwal2Sheeba Saqib3Haroon Hafeez4Department of Internal Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PakistanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PakistanDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PakistanDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PakistanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan Introduction: A critical result of an investigation is considered a representation of a pathophysiological state deemed to be high-risk or life-threatening for the patient. Therefore, such results should be addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. Unfortunately, routine closed-chart audits suggested that the compliance of physicians in documenting critical alerts in patient notes was poor. This prompted the hospital to conduct a continuous quality improvement (CQI) project to improve the physicians' compliance. Materials and Methods: A cause-and-effect analysis was conducted using a fishbone diagram to identify the reasons for poor compliance. Based on the analysis, several modifications were made, including, but not limited to, hospital-wide educational sessions on the standard operating procedures of receiving and documenting critical alerts for the physicians, daily audit of critical alerts to review the appropriateness of documentation, and introduction of a new module in the hospital electronic medical record to acknowledge and document receiving critical alerts. Results: Before implementing the strategies to improve physicians' documentation compliance, the average compliance rate was 57 % in April 2020, and the median compliance rate was 52 % (January 2020 - April 2020). However, afterwards, within a couple of months of implementing changes, the average compliance rate increased to 88 %. This improvement was sustained for the next eight months (median of 89 %). Conclusion: This study found that CQI approach can be used to improve the compliance of the physicians for appropriately and timely documenting critical alerts, in this case, by continued education and training process and incorporating changes into the electronic hospital information system. https://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/419Continuous quality improvementcritical alertsdocumentationinvestigationsoptimisation of care |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wania Imtiaz Khawaja Shehryar Nasir Fareeha Kanwal Sheeba Saqib Haroon Hafeez |
spellingShingle |
Wania Imtiaz Khawaja Shehryar Nasir Fareeha Kanwal Sheeba Saqib Haroon Hafeez Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties Continuous quality improvement critical alerts documentation investigations optimisation of care |
author_facet |
Wania Imtiaz Khawaja Shehryar Nasir Fareeha Kanwal Sheeba Saqib Haroon Hafeez |
author_sort |
Wania Imtiaz |
title |
Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital |
title_short |
Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital |
title_full |
Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital |
title_fullStr |
Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital |
title_full_unstemmed |
Improving Compliance of Physicians in Reporting and Documenting Critical Alerts in a Cancer Hospital |
title_sort |
improving compliance of physicians in reporting and documenting critical alerts in a cancer hospital |
publisher |
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Trust |
series |
Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties |
issn |
2411-989X |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Introduction: A critical result of an investigation is considered a representation of a pathophysiological state deemed to be high-risk or life-threatening for the patient. Therefore, such results should be addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. Unfortunately, routine closed-chart audits suggested that the compliance of physicians in documenting critical alerts in patient notes was poor. This prompted the hospital to conduct a continuous quality improvement (CQI) project to improve the physicians' compliance. Materials and Methods: A cause-and-effect analysis was conducted using a fishbone diagram to identify the reasons for poor compliance. Based on the analysis, several modifications were made, including, but not limited to, hospital-wide educational sessions on the standard operating procedures of receiving and documenting critical alerts for the physicians, daily audit of critical alerts to review the appropriateness of documentation, and introduction of a new module in the hospital electronic medical record to acknowledge and document receiving critical alerts. Results: Before implementing the strategies to improve physicians' documentation compliance, the average compliance rate was 57 % in April 2020, and the median compliance rate was 52 % (January 2020 - April 2020). However, afterwards, within a couple of months of implementing changes, the average compliance rate increased to 88 %. This improvement was sustained for the next eight months (median of 89 %). Conclusion: This study found that CQI approach can be used to improve the compliance of the physicians for appropriately and timely documenting critical alerts, in this case, by continued education and training process and incorporating changes into the electronic hospital information system.
|
topic |
Continuous quality improvement critical alerts documentation investigations optimisation of care |
url |
https://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/419 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT waniaimtiaz improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital AT khawajashehryarnasir improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital AT fareehakanwal improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital AT sheebasaqib improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital AT haroonhafeez improvingcomplianceofphysiciansinreportinganddocumentingcriticalalertsinacancerhospital |
_version_ |
1716850742785998848 |