Bio- Social Determinants Of Birth Weight In Rural Urban Nagpur

Research Questions: What are the bio â€" social determinants of birth weight of babies born in an urban- rural area? Objectives: 1. To study the biosocial determinants of birth weight 2. To determine which of the these affects birth weight. Design : Cross- sectional st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gawande U.H, Pimpalgaonkar M.S, Bethariya S.H
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 1994-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Community Medicine
Online Access:http://www.ijcm.org.in/article.asp?issn=0970-0218;year=1994;volume=19;issue=2;spage=64;epage=67;aulast=Gawande;type=0
id doaj-e1191cc615344b4392aa47f3d0fafca5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1191cc615344b4392aa47f3d0fafca52020-11-24T22:47:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Community Medicine0970-02181998-35811994-01-011926467Bio- Social Determinants Of Birth Weight In Rural Urban NagpurGawande U.HPimpalgaonkar M.SBethariya S.HResearch Questions: What are the bio â€" social determinants of birth weight of babies born in an urban- rural area? Objectives: 1. To study the biosocial determinants of birth weight 2. To determine which of the these affects birth weight. Design : Cross- sectional study. Setting : General hospital in Nagpur Participants: Mothers and their babies who were delivered in hospital. Study Variables : Motherâ€s age, parity, inter- pregnancy interval, socio-economic status, literacy status, antenatal care. Outcome Variable: Birth weight of the Infant. Statistical Analysis: Chi square test. Results: The proportion of low birth weight babies was high in teenage mothers(41.9%) and those over the age of 30 years. Primi and grand multiparity were associated with higher prevalence of low birth weight babies (43.2% & 43.9% respectively). Interpregnancy interval of less than one and a half years had a high prevalence of LBW babies (44.7%) but an interval of 5 years was also a risk as there were other associated risk factors like secondary sterility, tuberculosis etc. Low socio-economic status and low literacy levels were associated with significant proportion of LBW babies. Those mothers who had received adequate antenatal care gave birth to a significantly lower proportion of LBW babies than those who has not received antenatal care. Conclusion: Birthweight is determined by biosocial factors which are recognisable and some of which can be controlled.http://www.ijcm.org.in/article.asp?issn=0970-0218;year=1994;volume=19;issue=2;spage=64;epage=67;aulast=Gawande;type=0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gawande U.H
Pimpalgaonkar M.S
Bethariya S.H
spellingShingle Gawande U.H
Pimpalgaonkar M.S
Bethariya S.H
Bio- Social Determinants Of Birth Weight In Rural Urban Nagpur
Indian Journal of Community Medicine
author_facet Gawande U.H
Pimpalgaonkar M.S
Bethariya S.H
author_sort Gawande U.H
title Bio- Social Determinants Of Birth Weight In Rural Urban Nagpur
title_short Bio- Social Determinants Of Birth Weight In Rural Urban Nagpur
title_full Bio- Social Determinants Of Birth Weight In Rural Urban Nagpur
title_fullStr Bio- Social Determinants Of Birth Weight In Rural Urban Nagpur
title_full_unstemmed Bio- Social Determinants Of Birth Weight In Rural Urban Nagpur
title_sort bio- social determinants of birth weight in rural urban nagpur
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Community Medicine
issn 0970-0218
1998-3581
publishDate 1994-01-01
description Research Questions: What are the bio â€" social determinants of birth weight of babies born in an urban- rural area? Objectives: 1. To study the biosocial determinants of birth weight 2. To determine which of the these affects birth weight. Design : Cross- sectional study. Setting : General hospital in Nagpur Participants: Mothers and their babies who were delivered in hospital. Study Variables : Motherâ€s age, parity, inter- pregnancy interval, socio-economic status, literacy status, antenatal care. Outcome Variable: Birth weight of the Infant. Statistical Analysis: Chi square test. Results: The proportion of low birth weight babies was high in teenage mothers(41.9%) and those over the age of 30 years. Primi and grand multiparity were associated with higher prevalence of low birth weight babies (43.2% & 43.9% respectively). Interpregnancy interval of less than one and a half years had a high prevalence of LBW babies (44.7%) but an interval of 5 years was also a risk as there were other associated risk factors like secondary sterility, tuberculosis etc. Low socio-economic status and low literacy levels were associated with significant proportion of LBW babies. Those mothers who had received adequate antenatal care gave birth to a significantly lower proportion of LBW babies than those who has not received antenatal care. Conclusion: Birthweight is determined by biosocial factors which are recognisable and some of which can be controlled.
url http://www.ijcm.org.in/article.asp?issn=0970-0218;year=1994;volume=19;issue=2;spage=64;epage=67;aulast=Gawande;type=0
work_keys_str_mv AT gawandeuh biosocialdeterminantsofbirthweightinruralurbannagpur
AT pimpalgaonkarms biosocialdeterminantsofbirthweightinruralurbannagpur
AT bethariyash biosocialdeterminantsofbirthweightinruralurbannagpur
_version_ 1725681284672389120