Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25G versus 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade

AIM: To compare the clinical efficacy and safty of 25G and 27G pars planavitrectomy(PPV)in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment(RRD)with air tamponade.<p>METHODS: Sixty-three cases(63 eyes)with RRD underwent 27G or 25G PPV from May 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong-Bo Huang, Guang-Jie Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2019-09-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
25G
27G
Online Access:http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/9/201909037.pdf
id doaj-e0f860f1c40b4a84be7df588554d6834
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0f860f1c40b4a84be7df588554d68342020-11-25T02:18:33ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51231672-51232019-09-011991602160410.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.9.37Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25G versus 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponadeHong-Bo Huang0Guang-Jie Han1Department of Ophthalmology, Liuzhou Eye Cross Hospital, Liuzhou 545001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Liuzhou Eye Cross Hospital, Liuzhou 545001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, ChinaAIM: To compare the clinical efficacy and safty of 25G and 27G pars planavitrectomy(PPV)in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment(RRD)with air tamponade.<p>METHODS: Sixty-three cases(63 eyes)with RRD underwent 27G or 25G PPV from May 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-three eyes(33 eyes)for 25G vitrectomy and 30 eyes underwent 27G vitrectomy. The main outcome measurements of the study included the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA, LogMAR), intraocular pressure, surgicaltime, retinal reattachment rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications.<p>RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline demographic between the two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). The BCVA was increased significantly in both groups(all <i>P</i><0.01), but there was no significant difference in terms of visual improvement between the two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). The mean surgical time in the 25G group was(44.13±5.9)min, which was no significant difference than that of 27G group(46.07±6.1)min(<i>t</i>=0.028, <i>P</i>=0.412). The retinal reattachment rate after a single operation was 91% and 93% for 25G and 27G group respectively(<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.015, <i>P</i>=0.902). There was no significant difference about hypotony(<6mmHg, 1mmHg=0.133kPa)between the 25G group(15%)and the 27G group(10%),(<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.376, <i>P</i>=0.540). No serious complication such as choroidal detachment and endophthalmitis was observed in both groups.<p>CONCLUSION: This study finds no significant differences in the surgical time, the rate of reattachment of retina, improvement of BCVA and complications between the 25G or 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade. 27G vitrectomy with air tamponade seems to be a safe, economical and effective surgery for RRD.http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/9/201909037.pdf25G27Gvitrectomyrhegmatogenous retinal detachmentaseptic air tamponaderetinal reattachment rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hong-Bo Huang
Guang-Jie Han
spellingShingle Hong-Bo Huang
Guang-Jie Han
Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25G versus 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
25G
27G
vitrectomy
rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
aseptic air tamponade
retinal reattachment rate
author_facet Hong-Bo Huang
Guang-Jie Han
author_sort Hong-Bo Huang
title Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25G versus 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade
title_short Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25G versus 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade
title_full Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25G versus 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade
title_fullStr Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25G versus 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25G versus 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade
title_sort comparative study of the clinical efficacy of 25g versus 27g vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
issn 1672-5123
1672-5123
publishDate 2019-09-01
description AIM: To compare the clinical efficacy and safty of 25G and 27G pars planavitrectomy(PPV)in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment(RRD)with air tamponade.<p>METHODS: Sixty-three cases(63 eyes)with RRD underwent 27G or 25G PPV from May 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-three eyes(33 eyes)for 25G vitrectomy and 30 eyes underwent 27G vitrectomy. The main outcome measurements of the study included the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA, LogMAR), intraocular pressure, surgicaltime, retinal reattachment rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications.<p>RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline demographic between the two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). The BCVA was increased significantly in both groups(all <i>P</i><0.01), but there was no significant difference in terms of visual improvement between the two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). The mean surgical time in the 25G group was(44.13±5.9)min, which was no significant difference than that of 27G group(46.07±6.1)min(<i>t</i>=0.028, <i>P</i>=0.412). The retinal reattachment rate after a single operation was 91% and 93% for 25G and 27G group respectively(<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.015, <i>P</i>=0.902). There was no significant difference about hypotony(<6mmHg, 1mmHg=0.133kPa)between the 25G group(15%)and the 27G group(10%),(<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.376, <i>P</i>=0.540). No serious complication such as choroidal detachment and endophthalmitis was observed in both groups.<p>CONCLUSION: This study finds no significant differences in the surgical time, the rate of reattachment of retina, improvement of BCVA and complications between the 25G or 27G vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with air tamponade. 27G vitrectomy with air tamponade seems to be a safe, economical and effective surgery for RRD.
topic 25G
27G
vitrectomy
rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
aseptic air tamponade
retinal reattachment rate
url http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/9/201909037.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hongbohuang comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficacyof25gversus27gvitrectomyforrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentwithairtamponade
AT guangjiehan comparativestudyoftheclinicalefficacyof25gversus27gvitrectomyforrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentwithairtamponade
_version_ 1724881320367095808