The ISI distribution of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron

The simulation of ion-channel noise has an important role in computational neuroscience. In recent years several approximate methods of carrying out this simulation have been published, based on stochastic differential equations, and all giving slightly different results. The obvious, and essential,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Forbes Rowat, Priscilla E Greenwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2014.00111/full
id doaj-e0f84143638b4cb5b91880842d206fbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0f84143638b4cb5b91880842d206fbb2020-11-24T23:30:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882014-10-01810.3389/fncom.2014.00111102803The ISI distribution of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuronPeter Forbes Rowat0Priscilla E Greenwood1University California San DiegoUniversity of British ColumbiaThe simulation of ion-channel noise has an important role in computational neuroscience. In recent years several approximate methods of carrying out this simulation have been published, based on stochastic differential equations, and all giving slightly different results. The obvious, and essential, question is: which method is the most accurate and which is most computationally efficient? Here we make a contribution to the answer. We compare interspike interval histograms from simulated data using four different approximate stochastic differential equation (SDE) models of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron, as well as the exact Markov chain model simulated by the Gillespie algorithm. One of the recent SDE models is the same as the Kurtz approximation first published in 1978. All the models considered give similar ISI histograms over a wide range of deterministic and stochastic input. Three features of these histograms are an initial peak, followed by one or more bumps, and then an exponential tail. We explore how these features depend on deterministic input and on level of channel noise, and explain the results using the stochastic dynamics of the model. We conclude with a rough ranking of the four SDE models with respect to the similarity of their ISI histograms to the histogram of the exact Markov chain model.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2014.00111/fullstochastic dynamicsHodgkin-HuxleyGillespie AlgorithmISI distributionstochastic differential equationISI histogram
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Forbes Rowat
Priscilla E Greenwood
spellingShingle Peter Forbes Rowat
Priscilla E Greenwood
The ISI distribution of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
stochastic dynamics
Hodgkin-Huxley
Gillespie Algorithm
ISI distribution
stochastic differential equation
ISI histogram
author_facet Peter Forbes Rowat
Priscilla E Greenwood
author_sort Peter Forbes Rowat
title The ISI distribution of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron
title_short The ISI distribution of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron
title_full The ISI distribution of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron
title_fullStr The ISI distribution of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron
title_full_unstemmed The ISI distribution of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron
title_sort isi distribution of the stochastic hodgkin-huxley neuron
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
issn 1662-5188
publishDate 2014-10-01
description The simulation of ion-channel noise has an important role in computational neuroscience. In recent years several approximate methods of carrying out this simulation have been published, based on stochastic differential equations, and all giving slightly different results. The obvious, and essential, question is: which method is the most accurate and which is most computationally efficient? Here we make a contribution to the answer. We compare interspike interval histograms from simulated data using four different approximate stochastic differential equation (SDE) models of the stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron, as well as the exact Markov chain model simulated by the Gillespie algorithm. One of the recent SDE models is the same as the Kurtz approximation first published in 1978. All the models considered give similar ISI histograms over a wide range of deterministic and stochastic input. Three features of these histograms are an initial peak, followed by one or more bumps, and then an exponential tail. We explore how these features depend on deterministic input and on level of channel noise, and explain the results using the stochastic dynamics of the model. We conclude with a rough ranking of the four SDE models with respect to the similarity of their ISI histograms to the histogram of the exact Markov chain model.
topic stochastic dynamics
Hodgkin-Huxley
Gillespie Algorithm
ISI distribution
stochastic differential equation
ISI histogram
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2014.00111/full
work_keys_str_mv AT peterforbesrowat theisidistributionofthestochastichodgkinhuxleyneuron
AT priscillaegreenwood theisidistributionofthestochastichodgkinhuxleyneuron
AT peterforbesrowat isidistributionofthestochastichodgkinhuxleyneuron
AT priscillaegreenwood isidistributionofthestochastichodgkinhuxleyneuron
_version_ 1725541421717389312