Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementation of medical interventions may vary with organization and available capacity. The influence of this source of variability on the cost-effectiveness can be evaluated by computer simulation following a carefully designed e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sakkers Ralph JB, Boere-Boonekamp Magda M, Van Merode Godefridus G, Ramwadhdoebe Sabrina, Buskens Erik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-03-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/75
id doaj-e0f29b55ce4947918f10e4de1df3956f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0f29b55ce4947918f10e4de1df3956f2020-11-24T22:01:12ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632010-03-011017510.1186/1472-6963-10-75Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the NetherlandsSakkers Ralph JBBoere-Boonekamp Magda MVan Merode Godefridus GRamwadhdoebe SabrinaBuskens Erik<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementation of medical interventions may vary with organization and available capacity. The influence of this source of variability on the cost-effectiveness can be evaluated by computer simulation following a carefully designed experimental design. We used this approach as part of a national implementation study of ultrasonographic infant screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>First, workflow and performance of the current screening program (physical examination) was analyzed. Then, experimental variables, i.e., relevant entities in the workflow of screening, were defined with varying levels to describe alternative implementation models. To determine the relevant levels literature and interviews among professional stakeholders are used. Finally, cost-effectiveness ratios (inclusive of sensitivity analyses) for the range of implementation scenarios were calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The four experimental variables for implementation were: 1) location of the consultation, 2) integrated with regular consultation or not, 3) number of ultrasound machines and 4) discipline of the screener. With respective numbers of levels of 3,2,3,4 in total 72 possible scenarios were identified. In our model experimental variables related to the number of available ultrasound machines and the necessity of an extra consultation influenced the cost-effectiveness most.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Better information comes available for choosing optimised implementation strategies where organizational and capacity variables are important using the combination of simulation models and an experimental design. Information to determine the levels of experimental variables can be extracted from the literature or directly from experts.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/75
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sakkers Ralph JB
Boere-Boonekamp Magda M
Van Merode Godefridus G
Ramwadhdoebe Sabrina
Buskens Erik
spellingShingle Sakkers Ralph JB
Boere-Boonekamp Magda M
Van Merode Godefridus G
Ramwadhdoebe Sabrina
Buskens Erik
Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Sakkers Ralph JB
Boere-Boonekamp Magda M
Van Merode Godefridus G
Ramwadhdoebe Sabrina
Buskens Erik
author_sort Sakkers Ralph JB
title Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands
title_short Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands
title_full Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands
title_sort implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the netherlands
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2010-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementation of medical interventions may vary with organization and available capacity. The influence of this source of variability on the cost-effectiveness can be evaluated by computer simulation following a carefully designed experimental design. We used this approach as part of a national implementation study of ultrasonographic infant screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>First, workflow and performance of the current screening program (physical examination) was analyzed. Then, experimental variables, i.e., relevant entities in the workflow of screening, were defined with varying levels to describe alternative implementation models. To determine the relevant levels literature and interviews among professional stakeholders are used. Finally, cost-effectiveness ratios (inclusive of sensitivity analyses) for the range of implementation scenarios were calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The four experimental variables for implementation were: 1) location of the consultation, 2) integrated with regular consultation or not, 3) number of ultrasound machines and 4) discipline of the screener. With respective numbers of levels of 3,2,3,4 in total 72 possible scenarios were identified. In our model experimental variables related to the number of available ultrasound machines and the necessity of an extra consultation influenced the cost-effectiveness most.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Better information comes available for choosing optimised implementation strategies where organizational and capacity variables are important using the combination of simulation models and an experimental design. Information to determine the levels of experimental variables can be extracted from the literature or directly from experts.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/75
work_keys_str_mv AT sakkersralphjb implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands
AT boereboonekampmagdam implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands
AT vanmerodegodefridusg implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands
AT ramwadhdoebesabrina implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands
AT buskenserik implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands
_version_ 1725841065561292800