Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementation of medical interventions may vary with organization and available capacity. The influence of this source of variability on the cost-effectiveness can be evaluated by computer simulation following a carefully designed e...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2010-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/75 |
id |
doaj-e0f29b55ce4947918f10e4de1df3956f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e0f29b55ce4947918f10e4de1df3956f2020-11-24T22:01:12ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632010-03-011017510.1186/1472-6963-10-75Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the NetherlandsSakkers Ralph JBBoere-Boonekamp Magda MVan Merode Godefridus GRamwadhdoebe SabrinaBuskens Erik<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementation of medical interventions may vary with organization and available capacity. The influence of this source of variability on the cost-effectiveness can be evaluated by computer simulation following a carefully designed experimental design. We used this approach as part of a national implementation study of ultrasonographic infant screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>First, workflow and performance of the current screening program (physical examination) was analyzed. Then, experimental variables, i.e., relevant entities in the workflow of screening, were defined with varying levels to describe alternative implementation models. To determine the relevant levels literature and interviews among professional stakeholders are used. Finally, cost-effectiveness ratios (inclusive of sensitivity analyses) for the range of implementation scenarios were calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The four experimental variables for implementation were: 1) location of the consultation, 2) integrated with regular consultation or not, 3) number of ultrasound machines and 4) discipline of the screener. With respective numbers of levels of 3,2,3,4 in total 72 possible scenarios were identified. In our model experimental variables related to the number of available ultrasound machines and the necessity of an extra consultation influenced the cost-effectiveness most.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Better information comes available for choosing optimised implementation strategies where organizational and capacity variables are important using the combination of simulation models and an experimental design. Information to determine the levels of experimental variables can be extracted from the literature or directly from experts.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/75 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sakkers Ralph JB Boere-Boonekamp Magda M Van Merode Godefridus G Ramwadhdoebe Sabrina Buskens Erik |
spellingShingle |
Sakkers Ralph JB Boere-Boonekamp Magda M Van Merode Godefridus G Ramwadhdoebe Sabrina Buskens Erik Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands BMC Health Services Research |
author_facet |
Sakkers Ralph JB Boere-Boonekamp Magda M Van Merode Godefridus G Ramwadhdoebe Sabrina Buskens Erik |
author_sort |
Sakkers Ralph JB |
title |
Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands |
title_short |
Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands |
title_full |
Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr |
Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the Netherlands |
title_sort |
implementation by simulation; strategies for ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in the netherlands |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2010-03-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementation of medical interventions may vary with organization and available capacity. The influence of this source of variability on the cost-effectiveness can be evaluated by computer simulation following a carefully designed experimental design. We used this approach as part of a national implementation study of ultrasonographic infant screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>First, workflow and performance of the current screening program (physical examination) was analyzed. Then, experimental variables, i.e., relevant entities in the workflow of screening, were defined with varying levels to describe alternative implementation models. To determine the relevant levels literature and interviews among professional stakeholders are used. Finally, cost-effectiveness ratios (inclusive of sensitivity analyses) for the range of implementation scenarios were calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The four experimental variables for implementation were: 1) location of the consultation, 2) integrated with regular consultation or not, 3) number of ultrasound machines and 4) discipline of the screener. With respective numbers of levels of 3,2,3,4 in total 72 possible scenarios were identified. In our model experimental variables related to the number of available ultrasound machines and the necessity of an extra consultation influenced the cost-effectiveness most.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Better information comes available for choosing optimised implementation strategies where organizational and capacity variables are important using the combination of simulation models and an experimental design. Information to determine the levels of experimental variables can be extracted from the literature or directly from experts.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/75 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sakkersralphjb implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands AT boereboonekampmagdam implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands AT vanmerodegodefridusg implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands AT ramwadhdoebesabrina implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands AT buskenserik implementationbysimulationstrategiesforultrasoundscreeningforhipdysplasiainthenetherlands |
_version_ |
1725841065561292800 |