Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
Cognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (R...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218/full |
id |
doaj-e0db4b3216f34eacbb219154846ed4d6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e0db4b3216f34eacbb219154846ed4d62020-11-25T03:46:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612017-05-011110.3389/fnhum.2017.00218247791Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG OscillationsNikita A. Novikov0Yulia M. Nurislamova1Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili2Evgenii E. Kalenkovich3Anna A. Lapina4Boris V. Chernyshev5Boris V. Chernyshev6Laboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaDepartment of Higher Nervous Activity, Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscow, RussiaCognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (RT) of erroneous responses relative to correct responses. Specifically, slow responses are related to attentional lapses and decision uncertainty, these conditions tending to delay RTs of both erroneous and correct responses. Here we studied if RT may be a valid approximation distinguishing trials with high and low levels of sustained attention and decision uncertainty. We analyzed response-related and feedback-related modulations in theta, alpha and beta band activity in the auditory version of the two-choice condensation task, which is highly demanding for sustained attention while involves no inhibition of prepotent responses. Depending upon response speed and accuracy, trials were divided into slow correct, slow erroneous, fast correct and fast erroneous. We found that error-related frontal midline theta (FMT) was present only on fast erroneous trials. The feedback-related FMT was equally strong on slow erroneous and fast erroneous trials. Late post-response posterior alpha suppression was stronger on erroneous slow trials. Feedback-related frontal beta was present only on slow correct trials. The data obtained cumulatively suggests that RT allows distinguishing the two types of trials, with fast trials related to higher levels of attention and low uncertainty, and slow trials related to lower levels of attention and higher uncertainty.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218/fullcognitive controlattentionresponse timeerror detectiontheta oscillationsalpha oscillations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nikita A. Novikov Yulia M. Nurislamova Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili Evgenii E. Kalenkovich Anna A. Lapina Boris V. Chernyshev Boris V. Chernyshev |
spellingShingle |
Nikita A. Novikov Yulia M. Nurislamova Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili Evgenii E. Kalenkovich Anna A. Lapina Boris V. Chernyshev Boris V. Chernyshev Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations Frontiers in Human Neuroscience cognitive control attention response time error detection theta oscillations alpha oscillations |
author_facet |
Nikita A. Novikov Yulia M. Nurislamova Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili Evgenii E. Kalenkovich Anna A. Lapina Boris V. Chernyshev Boris V. Chernyshev |
author_sort |
Nikita A. Novikov |
title |
Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations |
title_short |
Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations |
title_full |
Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations |
title_fullStr |
Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations |
title_sort |
slow and fast responses: two mechanisms of trial outcome processing revealed by eeg oscillations |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-5161 |
publishDate |
2017-05-01 |
description |
Cognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (RT) of erroneous responses relative to correct responses. Specifically, slow responses are related to attentional lapses and decision uncertainty, these conditions tending to delay RTs of both erroneous and correct responses. Here we studied if RT may be a valid approximation distinguishing trials with high and low levels of sustained attention and decision uncertainty. We analyzed response-related and feedback-related modulations in theta, alpha and beta band activity in the auditory version of the two-choice condensation task, which is highly demanding for sustained attention while involves no inhibition of prepotent responses. Depending upon response speed and accuracy, trials were divided into slow correct, slow erroneous, fast correct and fast erroneous. We found that error-related frontal midline theta (FMT) was present only on fast erroneous trials. The feedback-related FMT was equally strong on slow erroneous and fast erroneous trials. Late post-response posterior alpha suppression was stronger on erroneous slow trials. Feedback-related frontal beta was present only on slow correct trials. The data obtained cumulatively suggests that RT allows distinguishing the two types of trials, with fast trials related to higher levels of attention and low uncertainty, and slow trials related to lower levels of attention and higher uncertainty. |
topic |
cognitive control attention response time error detection theta oscillations alpha oscillations |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nikitaanovikov slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations AT yuliamnurislamova slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations AT nataliaazhozhikashvili slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations AT evgeniiekalenkovich slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations AT annaalapina slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations AT borisvchernyshev slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations AT borisvchernyshev slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations |
_version_ |
1724505796434198528 |