Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations

Cognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikita A. Novikov, Yulia M. Nurislamova, Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili, Evgenii E. Kalenkovich, Anna A. Lapina, Boris V. Chernyshev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218/full
id doaj-e0db4b3216f34eacbb219154846ed4d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0db4b3216f34eacbb219154846ed4d62020-11-25T03:46:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612017-05-011110.3389/fnhum.2017.00218247791Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG OscillationsNikita A. Novikov0Yulia M. Nurislamova1Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili2Evgenii E. Kalenkovich3Anna A. Lapina4Boris V. Chernyshev5Boris V. Chernyshev6Laboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaLaboratory of Cognitive Psychophysiology, National Research University—Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, RussiaDepartment of Higher Nervous Activity, Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscow, RussiaCognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (RT) of erroneous responses relative to correct responses. Specifically, slow responses are related to attentional lapses and decision uncertainty, these conditions tending to delay RTs of both erroneous and correct responses. Here we studied if RT may be a valid approximation distinguishing trials with high and low levels of sustained attention and decision uncertainty. We analyzed response-related and feedback-related modulations in theta, alpha and beta band activity in the auditory version of the two-choice condensation task, which is highly demanding for sustained attention while involves no inhibition of prepotent responses. Depending upon response speed and accuracy, trials were divided into slow correct, slow erroneous, fast correct and fast erroneous. We found that error-related frontal midline theta (FMT) was present only on fast erroneous trials. The feedback-related FMT was equally strong on slow erroneous and fast erroneous trials. Late post-response posterior alpha suppression was stronger on erroneous slow trials. Feedback-related frontal beta was present only on slow correct trials. The data obtained cumulatively suggests that RT allows distinguishing the two types of trials, with fast trials related to higher levels of attention and low uncertainty, and slow trials related to lower levels of attention and higher uncertainty.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218/fullcognitive controlattentionresponse timeerror detectiontheta oscillationsalpha oscillations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikita A. Novikov
Yulia M. Nurislamova
Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili
Evgenii E. Kalenkovich
Anna A. Lapina
Boris V. Chernyshev
Boris V. Chernyshev
spellingShingle Nikita A. Novikov
Yulia M. Nurislamova
Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili
Evgenii E. Kalenkovich
Anna A. Lapina
Boris V. Chernyshev
Boris V. Chernyshev
Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
cognitive control
attention
response time
error detection
theta oscillations
alpha oscillations
author_facet Nikita A. Novikov
Yulia M. Nurislamova
Natalia A. Zhozhikashvili
Evgenii E. Kalenkovich
Anna A. Lapina
Boris V. Chernyshev
Boris V. Chernyshev
author_sort Nikita A. Novikov
title Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_short Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_full Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_fullStr Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_full_unstemmed Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_sort slow and fast responses: two mechanisms of trial outcome processing revealed by eeg oscillations
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Cognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (RT) of erroneous responses relative to correct responses. Specifically, slow responses are related to attentional lapses and decision uncertainty, these conditions tending to delay RTs of both erroneous and correct responses. Here we studied if RT may be a valid approximation distinguishing trials with high and low levels of sustained attention and decision uncertainty. We analyzed response-related and feedback-related modulations in theta, alpha and beta band activity in the auditory version of the two-choice condensation task, which is highly demanding for sustained attention while involves no inhibition of prepotent responses. Depending upon response speed and accuracy, trials were divided into slow correct, slow erroneous, fast correct and fast erroneous. We found that error-related frontal midline theta (FMT) was present only on fast erroneous trials. The feedback-related FMT was equally strong on slow erroneous and fast erroneous trials. Late post-response posterior alpha suppression was stronger on erroneous slow trials. Feedback-related frontal beta was present only on slow correct trials. The data obtained cumulatively suggests that RT allows distinguishing the two types of trials, with fast trials related to higher levels of attention and low uncertainty, and slow trials related to lower levels of attention and higher uncertainty.
topic cognitive control
attention
response time
error detection
theta oscillations
alpha oscillations
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nikitaanovikov slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT yuliamnurislamova slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT nataliaazhozhikashvili slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT evgeniiekalenkovich slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT annaalapina slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT borisvchernyshev slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT borisvchernyshev slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
_version_ 1724505796434198528