Comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven model

This study conducts a dynamic rolling comparison between the Pareto/NBD model (parametric model) and machine learning algorithms (observation-driven models) in customer base analysis, which the literature has not comprehensively investigated before. The aim is to find the comparative edge of these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shao-Ming Xie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Business Economics and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mla.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/13194
id doaj-e0da0b97679c48a5bafea3bd44aa79c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0da0b97679c48a5bafea3bd44aa79c12021-07-02T15:08:40ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityJournal of Business Economics and Management1611-16992029-44332020-10-0121610.3846/jbem.2020.13194Comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven modelShao-Ming Xie0Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan, PRC This study conducts a dynamic rolling comparison between the Pareto/NBD model (parametric model) and machine learning algorithms (observation-driven models) in customer base analysis, which the literature has not comprehensively investigated before. The aim is to find the comparative edge of these two approaches under customer base analysis and to define the implementation timing of these two paradigms. This research utilizes Pareto/NBD (Abe) as representative of Buy-Till-You-Die (BTYD) models in order to compete with machine learning algorithms and presents the following results. (1) The parametric model wins in transaction frequency prediction, whereas it loses in inactivity prediction. (2) The BTYD model outperforms machine learning in inactivity prediction when the customer base is active, performs better in an inactive customer base when competing with Poisson regression, and wins in a short-term active customer base when competing with a neural network algorithm in transaction frequency prediction. (3) The parametric model benefits more from a short calibration length and a long holdout/target period, which exhibit uncertainty. (4) The covariate effect helps Pareto/NBD (Abe) gain a better predictive result. These findings assist in defining the comparative edge and implementation timing of these two approaches and are useful for modeling and business decision making. https://www.mla.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/13194BTYDparametric modelPareto/NBD modelobservation-driven modelmachine learningcustomer base analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shao-Ming Xie
spellingShingle Shao-Ming Xie
Comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven model
Journal of Business Economics and Management
BTYD
parametric model
Pareto/NBD model
observation-driven model
machine learning
customer base analysis
author_facet Shao-Ming Xie
author_sort Shao-Ming Xie
title Comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven model
title_short Comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven model
title_full Comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven model
title_fullStr Comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven model
title_full_unstemmed Comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven model
title_sort comparative models in customer base analysis: parametric model and observation-driven model
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series Journal of Business Economics and Management
issn 1611-1699
2029-4433
publishDate 2020-10-01
description This study conducts a dynamic rolling comparison between the Pareto/NBD model (parametric model) and machine learning algorithms (observation-driven models) in customer base analysis, which the literature has not comprehensively investigated before. The aim is to find the comparative edge of these two approaches under customer base analysis and to define the implementation timing of these two paradigms. This research utilizes Pareto/NBD (Abe) as representative of Buy-Till-You-Die (BTYD) models in order to compete with machine learning algorithms and presents the following results. (1) The parametric model wins in transaction frequency prediction, whereas it loses in inactivity prediction. (2) The BTYD model outperforms machine learning in inactivity prediction when the customer base is active, performs better in an inactive customer base when competing with Poisson regression, and wins in a short-term active customer base when competing with a neural network algorithm in transaction frequency prediction. (3) The parametric model benefits more from a short calibration length and a long holdout/target period, which exhibit uncertainty. (4) The covariate effect helps Pareto/NBD (Abe) gain a better predictive result. These findings assist in defining the comparative edge and implementation timing of these two approaches and are useful for modeling and business decision making.
topic BTYD
parametric model
Pareto/NBD model
observation-driven model
machine learning
customer base analysis
url https://www.mla.vgtu.lt/index.php/JBEM/article/view/13194
work_keys_str_mv AT shaomingxie comparativemodelsincustomerbaseanalysisparametricmodelandobservationdrivenmodel
_version_ 1721327510732406784