Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy
Is the involvement of the public, commercial, governmental or academic elements of society a desired outcome for the future of archaeology within cultural heritage? If so, how is this best achieved? The involvement of multiple stakeholders calls for a strategic approach and formalised structures. In...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of York
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Internet Archaeology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue49/12/ |
id |
doaj-e0be9a2ed6fd4205bde33ec0f7d8ca7d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e0be9a2ed6fd4205bde33ec0f7d8ca7d2020-11-25T01:09:07ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872018-03-014910.11141/ia.49.12Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology StrategyMary TeehanRebecca H. JonesMike HeyworthIs the involvement of the public, commercial, governmental or academic elements of society a desired outcome for the future of archaeology within cultural heritage? If so, how is this best achieved? The involvement of multiple stakeholders calls for a strategic approach and formalised structures. In the last three years, three organisations have developed three strategies in three differing jurisdictions — Ireland, Scotland and England. Each had varied stakeholder engagement focuses. The following analyses the choices made in stakeholder involvement, the outcomes, challenges and effects on implementation plans.http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue49/12/archaeologystrategystakeholderheritageresearchgovernmentpolicyculture |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mary Teehan Rebecca H. Jones Mike Heyworth |
spellingShingle |
Mary Teehan Rebecca H. Jones Mike Heyworth Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy Internet Archaeology archaeology strategy stakeholder heritage research government policy culture |
author_facet |
Mary Teehan Rebecca H. Jones Mike Heyworth |
author_sort |
Mary Teehan |
title |
Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy |
title_short |
Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy |
title_full |
Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy |
title_fullStr |
Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy |
title_sort |
three for one: analysis of three differing approaches to developing an archaeology strategy |
publisher |
University of York |
series |
Internet Archaeology |
issn |
1363-5387 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Is the involvement of the public, commercial, governmental or academic elements of society a desired outcome for the future of archaeology within cultural heritage? If so, how is this best achieved? The involvement of multiple stakeholders calls for a strategic approach and formalised structures. In the last three years, three organisations have developed three strategies in three differing jurisdictions — Ireland, Scotland and England. Each had varied stakeholder engagement focuses. The following analyses the choices made in stakeholder involvement, the outcomes, challenges and effects on implementation plans. |
topic |
archaeology strategy stakeholder heritage research government policy culture |
url |
http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue49/12/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maryteehan threeforoneanalysisofthreedifferingapproachestodevelopinganarchaeologystrategy AT rebeccahjones threeforoneanalysisofthreedifferingapproachestodevelopinganarchaeologystrategy AT mikeheyworth threeforoneanalysisofthreedifferingapproachestodevelopinganarchaeologystrategy |
_version_ |
1725179925022900224 |