Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy

Is the involvement of the public, commercial, governmental or academic elements of society a desired outcome for the future of archaeology within cultural heritage? If so, how is this best achieved? The involvement of multiple stakeholders calls for a strategic approach and formalised structures. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mary Teehan, Rebecca H. Jones, Mike Heyworth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of York 2018-03-01
Series:Internet Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue49/12/
id doaj-e0be9a2ed6fd4205bde33ec0f7d8ca7d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0be9a2ed6fd4205bde33ec0f7d8ca7d2020-11-25T01:09:07ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872018-03-014910.11141/ia.49.12Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology StrategyMary TeehanRebecca H. JonesMike HeyworthIs the involvement of the public, commercial, governmental or academic elements of society a desired outcome for the future of archaeology within cultural heritage? If so, how is this best achieved? The involvement of multiple stakeholders calls for a strategic approach and formalised structures. In the last three years, three organisations have developed three strategies in three differing jurisdictions — Ireland, Scotland and England. Each had varied stakeholder engagement focuses. The following analyses the choices made in stakeholder involvement, the outcomes, challenges and effects on implementation plans.http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue49/12/archaeologystrategystakeholderheritageresearchgovernmentpolicyculture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mary Teehan
Rebecca H. Jones
Mike Heyworth
spellingShingle Mary Teehan
Rebecca H. Jones
Mike Heyworth
Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy
Internet Archaeology
archaeology
strategy
stakeholder
heritage
research
government
policy
culture
author_facet Mary Teehan
Rebecca H. Jones
Mike Heyworth
author_sort Mary Teehan
title Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy
title_short Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy
title_full Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy
title_fullStr Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Three for One: Analysis of Three Differing Approaches to Developing an Archaeology Strategy
title_sort three for one: analysis of three differing approaches to developing an archaeology strategy
publisher University of York
series Internet Archaeology
issn 1363-5387
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Is the involvement of the public, commercial, governmental or academic elements of society a desired outcome for the future of archaeology within cultural heritage? If so, how is this best achieved? The involvement of multiple stakeholders calls for a strategic approach and formalised structures. In the last three years, three organisations have developed three strategies in three differing jurisdictions — Ireland, Scotland and England. Each had varied stakeholder engagement focuses. The following analyses the choices made in stakeholder involvement, the outcomes, challenges and effects on implementation plans.
topic archaeology
strategy
stakeholder
heritage
research
government
policy
culture
url http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue49/12/
work_keys_str_mv AT maryteehan threeforoneanalysisofthreedifferingapproachestodevelopinganarchaeologystrategy
AT rebeccahjones threeforoneanalysisofthreedifferingapproachestodevelopinganarchaeologystrategy
AT mikeheyworth threeforoneanalysisofthreedifferingapproachestodevelopinganarchaeologystrategy
_version_ 1725179925022900224