Structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formation

Abstract Strategic network formation is a branch of network science that takes an economic perspective to the creation of social networks, considering that actors in a network form links in order to maximise some utility that they attain through their connections to other actors in the network. In p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faisal Ghaffar, Neil Hurley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-09-01
Series:Computational Social Networks
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-020-00079-4
id doaj-e0b53225d5c143ef82c49d75b36b5427
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0b53225d5c143ef82c49d75b36b54272021-04-02T18:17:05ZengSpringerOpenComputational Social Networks2197-43142020-09-017112710.1186/s40649-020-00079-4Structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formationFaisal Ghaffar0Neil Hurley1IBM Ireland LimitedInsight Centre of Data Analytics, University College DublinAbstract Strategic network formation is a branch of network science that takes an economic perspective to the creation of social networks, considering that actors in a network form links in order to maximise some utility that they attain through their connections to other actors in the network. In particular, Jackson’s Connections model, writes an actor’s utility as a sum over all other actors that can be reached along a path in the network of a benefit value that diminishes with the path length. In this paper, we are interested in the “social capital” that an actor retains due to their position in the network. Social capital can be understood as an ability to bond with actors, as well as an ability to form a bridge that connects otherwise disconnected actors. This bridging benefit has previously been modelled in another “structural hole” network formation game, proposed by Kleinberg. In this paper, we develop an approach that generalises the utility of Kleinberg’s game and combines it with that of the Connections model, to create a utility that models both the bonding and bridging capabilities of an actor with social capital. From this utility and its associated formation game, we derive a new centrality measure, which we dub “structural hole centrality”, to identify actors with high social capital. We analyse this measure by applying it to networks of different types, and assessing its correlation to other centrality metrics, using a benchmark dataset of 299 networks, drawn from different domains. Finally, using one social network from the dataset, we illustrate how an actor’s “structural hole centrality profile” can be used to identify their bridging and bonding value to the network.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-020-00079-4Strategic networksGraph centralitySocial capitalStructural holes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Faisal Ghaffar
Neil Hurley
spellingShingle Faisal Ghaffar
Neil Hurley
Structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formation
Computational Social Networks
Strategic networks
Graph centrality
Social capital
Structural holes
author_facet Faisal Ghaffar
Neil Hurley
author_sort Faisal Ghaffar
title Structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formation
title_short Structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formation
title_full Structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formation
title_fullStr Structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formation
title_full_unstemmed Structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formation
title_sort structural hole centrality: evaluating social capital through strategic network formation
publisher SpringerOpen
series Computational Social Networks
issn 2197-4314
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Strategic network formation is a branch of network science that takes an economic perspective to the creation of social networks, considering that actors in a network form links in order to maximise some utility that they attain through their connections to other actors in the network. In particular, Jackson’s Connections model, writes an actor’s utility as a sum over all other actors that can be reached along a path in the network of a benefit value that diminishes with the path length. In this paper, we are interested in the “social capital” that an actor retains due to their position in the network. Social capital can be understood as an ability to bond with actors, as well as an ability to form a bridge that connects otherwise disconnected actors. This bridging benefit has previously been modelled in another “structural hole” network formation game, proposed by Kleinberg. In this paper, we develop an approach that generalises the utility of Kleinberg’s game and combines it with that of the Connections model, to create a utility that models both the bonding and bridging capabilities of an actor with social capital. From this utility and its associated formation game, we derive a new centrality measure, which we dub “structural hole centrality”, to identify actors with high social capital. We analyse this measure by applying it to networks of different types, and assessing its correlation to other centrality metrics, using a benchmark dataset of 299 networks, drawn from different domains. Finally, using one social network from the dataset, we illustrate how an actor’s “structural hole centrality profile” can be used to identify their bridging and bonding value to the network.
topic Strategic networks
Graph centrality
Social capital
Structural holes
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-020-00079-4
work_keys_str_mv AT faisalghaffar structuralholecentralityevaluatingsocialcapitalthroughstrategicnetworkformation
AT neilhurley structuralholecentralityevaluatingsocialcapitalthroughstrategicnetworkformation
_version_ 1721552084811120640