Immediate versus delayed induction of labour in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background Mothers with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy can be managed with either immediate or delayed induction of labour with expectant monitoring of both mother and baby. There are risks and benefits associated with both the type of interventions. Hence, this review was conducted to...
Main Authors: | Jia Li, Xuecheng Shao, Shurong Song, Qian Liang, Yang Liu, Xiaojin Qi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-020-03407-8 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of Immediate Induction (Within 6 Hours) Versus Late Induction (After 24 Hours) in Terms of Mean PROM to Delivery Interval in Females Presenting with Term PROM
by: Kanwal Firdos, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Sublingual Misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: A randomized control trial
by: Sedigheh Ayati, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Copeptin in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
by: Agnieszka Marek, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Outcomes of Pregnancy with Chronic Hypertension
by: Kim Wongcharoenrut, et al.
Published: (2014-03-01) -
Should ACOG reconsider their criteria for the early diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy?
by: Farrah Naz Hussain, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)