Improving Criminal Responsibility Determinations Using Structured Professional Judgment
Forensic psychologists commonly utilize unstructured clinical judgment in aggregating clinical and forensic information in forming opinions. Unstructured clinical judgment is prone to evaluator bias and suboptimal levels of inter-rater reliability. This article proposes Structured Professional Judgm...
Main Authors: | Marvin W. Acklin, Joseph P. Velasquez |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700991/full |
Similar Items
-
THE EXPERT-ACCOUNTANT’S PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
by: Ekaterina Igorevna Erokhina, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
CONCEPTUAL AND REGULATORY DELIMITATIONS OF THE PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT WITHIN AN ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
by: Viorica Mirela ȘTEFAN-DUICU
Published: (2017-05-01) -
Methamphetamine psychosis, the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics
by: Amir Rezaei Ardani, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
The Status Quo of the Criminal Accountability for Marine Illegal Fishing in China: From the Perspective of Judgment Analysis
by: Li Feng, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Attempted altruistic infanticide in a context of psychotic decompensation induced by stress linked to the COVID-19pandemic: a case report
by: Camille Jantzi, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)