Monochrome Males and Colorful Females
Influences of educational level and gender were examined through free drawings. A total of 216 participants were recruited ranging from nursery school to university students. Using an adaptation of Turgeon’s methodology, participants were given a standardized set of colored pens and asked to draw a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2013-10-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013509254 |
id |
doaj-e0a0fb9970e64eed968a7e1a3f3e6cff |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e0a0fb9970e64eed968a7e1a3f3e6cff2020-11-25T02:59:18ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402013-10-01310.1177/215824401350925410.1177_2158244013509254Monochrome Males and Colorful FemalesLynn Wright0Fiona Black1University of Abertay, Dundee, UKUniversity of Abertay, Dundee, UKInfluences of educational level and gender were examined through free drawings. A total of 216 participants were recruited ranging from nursery school to university students. Using an adaptation of Turgeon’s methodology, participants were given a standardized set of colored pens and asked to draw a picture. Pictures were analyzed for the area of the page covered, colors used, number of colors used, and content. Overall, females covered more of the page, and used more colors than males. Females drew significantly more sky, flowers/trees and buildings (in most cases houses), and males drew more people and vehicles. In relation to educational level, nursery children used fewer colors than the other groups and secondary school children used more colors than primary school children. It was concluded that gender differences in content, and color, of drawings exist and these differences remain stable into adulthood. Results are discussed in terms of social and evolutionary theory.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013509254 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lynn Wright Fiona Black |
spellingShingle |
Lynn Wright Fiona Black Monochrome Males and Colorful Females SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Lynn Wright Fiona Black |
author_sort |
Lynn Wright |
title |
Monochrome Males and Colorful Females |
title_short |
Monochrome Males and Colorful Females |
title_full |
Monochrome Males and Colorful Females |
title_fullStr |
Monochrome Males and Colorful Females |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monochrome Males and Colorful Females |
title_sort |
monochrome males and colorful females |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2013-10-01 |
description |
Influences of educational level and gender were examined through free drawings. A total of 216 participants were recruited ranging from nursery school to university students. Using an adaptation of Turgeon’s methodology, participants were given a standardized set of colored pens and asked to draw a picture. Pictures were analyzed for the area of the page covered, colors used, number of colors used, and content. Overall, females covered more of the page, and used more colors than males. Females drew significantly more sky, flowers/trees and buildings (in most cases houses), and males drew more people and vehicles. In relation to educational level, nursery children used fewer colors than the other groups and secondary school children used more colors than primary school children. It was concluded that gender differences in content, and color, of drawings exist and these differences remain stable into adulthood. Results are discussed in terms of social and evolutionary theory. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013509254 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lynnwright monochromemalesandcolorfulfemales AT fionablack monochromemalesandcolorfulfemales |
_version_ |
1724703160832884736 |