Current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programs

The survival of Rottenburg University of Applied Sciences (HFR) was repeatedly questioned politically in the mid-1990 s. This had nothing to do with the fact that well-trained forestry academics were no longer needed, but had been triggered by fiscal policy savings. The applied Universities with for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Бастіан Кайзер
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ukrainian National Forestry University 2019-12-01
Series:Науковий вісник НЛТУ України
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nv.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/2094
id doaj-e0a0678d494e4148bbdb8c3d403ee785
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0a0678d494e4148bbdb8c3d403ee7852020-11-25T02:29:22ZengUkrainian National Forestry UniversityНауковий вісник НЛТУ України1994-78362519-24772019-12-012910222410.36930/402910032094Current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programsБастіан Кайзер0University of Applied Sciences, Rottenburg am NeckarThe survival of Rottenburg University of Applied Sciences (HFR) was repeatedly questioned politically in the mid-1990 s. This had nothing to do with the fact that well-trained forestry academics were no longer needed, but had been triggered by fiscal policy savings. The applied Universities with forestry programs (five) and forestry faculties (four) in Germany are rather small and had no strong lobby like the forestry itself. Unlike some competitors, in this precarious situation, the universities did not opt for a change in their clear forestry profile, but for a broader, future-oriented understanding of modern forestry. For this purpose, they are orientated on the experience from their own past and the discipline, analyse the developments in the industries and sectors that are close to forestry and specifically sought strategic partnerships in order to be able to expand their own field of competence. Thus, the conviction for their own development process originated, that the forestry science has come in its history from the practice, passing a period influenced by knowledge of the general sciences. After that, the universities joined a phase of the development of forestry disciplines, and now they must turn back to the practice again. In this sense, a circle seems to close here and the universities have an additional, important task to deal with: more than before, in addition to teaching and research, the transfer of research results must also be put into practice. At the same time, the process of teaching has to be designed in such a way that it also provides continuous offers for job oriented training. Therefore, the universities must be the melting pot for all relevant influences from other sciences, which are and will be important for the forestry practice. This does not create a new profile, but a broader one. As a result, we are no longer training largely equal graduates, but forestry graduates with very individual strengths, attains, and profiles who fit like different keys into the various locks of practical challenges. This path helped the HFR to safeguard its future, to meet high demand among young students and to be recognized as the "smallest university of excellence" in Germany.https://nv.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/2094forestry education; interdisciplinarity and intradisciplinarity; history of forestry; social responsibility and challenge; institutional profile building; individual profiling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Бастіан Кайзер
spellingShingle Бастіан Кайзер
Current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programs
Науковий вісник НЛТУ України
forestry education; interdisciplinarity and intradisciplinarity; history of forestry; social responsibility and challenge; institutional profile building; individual profiling
author_facet Бастіан Кайзер
author_sort Бастіан Кайзер
title Current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programs
title_short Current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programs
title_full Current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programs
title_fullStr Current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programs
title_full_unstemmed Current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programs
title_sort current influences in the development of future-oriented forestry programs
publisher Ukrainian National Forestry University
series Науковий вісник НЛТУ України
issn 1994-7836
2519-2477
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The survival of Rottenburg University of Applied Sciences (HFR) was repeatedly questioned politically in the mid-1990 s. This had nothing to do with the fact that well-trained forestry academics were no longer needed, but had been triggered by fiscal policy savings. The applied Universities with forestry programs (five) and forestry faculties (four) in Germany are rather small and had no strong lobby like the forestry itself. Unlike some competitors, in this precarious situation, the universities did not opt for a change in their clear forestry profile, but for a broader, future-oriented understanding of modern forestry. For this purpose, they are orientated on the experience from their own past and the discipline, analyse the developments in the industries and sectors that are close to forestry and specifically sought strategic partnerships in order to be able to expand their own field of competence. Thus, the conviction for their own development process originated, that the forestry science has come in its history from the practice, passing a period influenced by knowledge of the general sciences. After that, the universities joined a phase of the development of forestry disciplines, and now they must turn back to the practice again. In this sense, a circle seems to close here and the universities have an additional, important task to deal with: more than before, in addition to teaching and research, the transfer of research results must also be put into practice. At the same time, the process of teaching has to be designed in such a way that it also provides continuous offers for job oriented training. Therefore, the universities must be the melting pot for all relevant influences from other sciences, which are and will be important for the forestry practice. This does not create a new profile, but a broader one. As a result, we are no longer training largely equal graduates, but forestry graduates with very individual strengths, attains, and profiles who fit like different keys into the various locks of practical challenges. This path helped the HFR to safeguard its future, to meet high demand among young students and to be recognized as the "smallest university of excellence" in Germany.
topic forestry education; interdisciplinarity and intradisciplinarity; history of forestry; social responsibility and challenge; institutional profile building; individual profiling
url https://nv.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/2094
work_keys_str_mv AT bastíankajzer currentinfluencesinthedevelopmentoffutureorientedforestryprograms
_version_ 1724833587168018432