A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0

With the Industry 4.0 paradigm comes the convergence of the Internet Technologies and Operational Technologies, and concepts, such as Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), cloud manufacturing, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), and so on. These concepts bring industries into the big data era and allow fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julien Polge, Jérémy Robert, Yves Le Traon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7273
id doaj-e09b9a6387c3454691dfa687fa3e3441
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e09b9a6387c3454691dfa687fa3e34412020-12-19T00:06:43ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-12-01207273727310.3390/s20247273A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0Julien Polge0Jérémy Robert1Yves Le Traon2Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg, 6 Rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, LuxembourgInterdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg, 6 Rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, LuxembourgInterdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg, 6 Rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, LuxembourgWith the Industry 4.0 paradigm comes the convergence of the Internet Technologies and Operational Technologies, and concepts, such as Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), cloud manufacturing, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), and so on. These concepts bring industries into the big data era and allow for them to have access to potentially useful information in order to optimise the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE); however, most European industries still rely on the Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) model, where the production systems run as independent systems (i.e., without any communication with the upper levels). Those production systems are controlled by a Programmable Logic Controller, in which a static and rigid program is implemented. This program is static and rigid in a sense that the programmed routines cannot evolve over the time unless a human modifies it. However, to go further in terms of flexibility, we are convinced that it requires moving away from the aforementioned old-fashioned and rigid automation to a ML-based automation, i.e., where the control itself is based on the decisions that were taken by ML algorithms. In order to verify this, we applied a time series classification method on a scale model of a factory using real industrial controllers, and widened the variety of parts the production line has to treat. This study shows that satisfactory results can be obtained only at the expense of the human expertise (i.e., in the industrial process and in the ML process).https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7273automation architectureflexibilityIndustry 4.0machine learningtime series classification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julien Polge
Jérémy Robert
Yves Le Traon
spellingShingle Julien Polge
Jérémy Robert
Yves Le Traon
A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0
Sensors
automation architecture
flexibility
Industry 4.0
machine learning
time series classification
author_facet Julien Polge
Jérémy Robert
Yves Le Traon
author_sort Julien Polge
title A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0
title_short A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0
title_full A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0
title_fullStr A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0
title_full_unstemmed A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0
title_sort case driven study of the use of time series classification for flexibility in industry 4.0
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2020-12-01
description With the Industry 4.0 paradigm comes the convergence of the Internet Technologies and Operational Technologies, and concepts, such as Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), cloud manufacturing, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), and so on. These concepts bring industries into the big data era and allow for them to have access to potentially useful information in order to optimise the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE); however, most European industries still rely on the Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) model, where the production systems run as independent systems (i.e., without any communication with the upper levels). Those production systems are controlled by a Programmable Logic Controller, in which a static and rigid program is implemented. This program is static and rigid in a sense that the programmed routines cannot evolve over the time unless a human modifies it. However, to go further in terms of flexibility, we are convinced that it requires moving away from the aforementioned old-fashioned and rigid automation to a ML-based automation, i.e., where the control itself is based on the decisions that were taken by ML algorithms. In order to verify this, we applied a time series classification method on a scale model of a factory using real industrial controllers, and widened the variety of parts the production line has to treat. This study shows that satisfactory results can be obtained only at the expense of the human expertise (i.e., in the industrial process and in the ML process).
topic automation architecture
flexibility
Industry 4.0
machine learning
time series classification
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7273
work_keys_str_mv AT julienpolge acasedrivenstudyoftheuseoftimeseriesclassificationforflexibilityinindustry40
AT jeremyrobert acasedrivenstudyoftheuseoftimeseriesclassificationforflexibilityinindustry40
AT yvesletraon acasedrivenstudyoftheuseoftimeseriesclassificationforflexibilityinindustry40
AT julienpolge casedrivenstudyoftheuseoftimeseriesclassificationforflexibilityinindustry40
AT jeremyrobert casedrivenstudyoftheuseoftimeseriesclassificationforflexibilityinindustry40
AT yvesletraon casedrivenstudyoftheuseoftimeseriesclassificationforflexibilityinindustry40
_version_ 1724378039822843904