Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tobacco control strategies have mainly targeted reducing demand. Supply-side focused measures, though less familiar, deserve consideration, particularly to achieve 'endgame' tobacco control aims (e.g. achieving close to zer...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/580 |
id |
doaj-e08eefc4dbae40d290788dd7ddd78763 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e08eefc4dbae40d290788dd7ddd787632020-11-24T20:55:01ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582011-07-0111158010.1186/1471-2458-11-580Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitionersWilson NickThomson GeorgeRussell MarieEdwards RichardGifford Heather<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tobacco control strategies have mainly targeted reducing demand. Supply-side focused measures, though less familiar, deserve consideration, particularly to achieve 'endgame' tobacco control aims (e.g. achieving close to zero smoking prevalence). We explored attitudes towards supply-side focused 'endgame' tobacco control approaches and how they can be best communicated with senior policymakers, journalists, and public health practitioners.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We identified five supply-side focused approaches which could potentially lead to the tobacco endgame: two structural models and three discrete actions. The structural models were: (i) a Nicotine Authority to coordinate tobacco control activities and regulate the nicotine/tobacco market for public health aims; and (ii) a Tobacco Supply Agency acting as a monopoly purchaser of tobacco products and controlling the tobacco supply for public health aims. The actions were: (a) allocating progressively reducing tobacco product import quotas (the 'sinking lid') until importation and commercial sale of tobacco products ceased; (b) making tobacco companies responsible for reducing smoking prevalence with stringent financial penalties if targets were missed; and (c) new laws to facilitate litigation against tobacco companies. These approaches were presented as means to achieve a tobacco free New Zealand by 2020 to 19 senior policymakers, journalists, and public health physicians in two focus groups and eight interviews, and their reactions sought.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The tobacco-free vision was widely supported. Participants engaged fully with the proposed tobacco control approaches, which were viewed as interesting or even intriguing. Most supported increasing the focus on supply-side measures. Views differed greatly about the desirability, feasibility and likely effectiveness of each approach. Participants identified a range of potential barriers to implementation and challenges to successfully advocating and communicating these approaches. The current framing of tobacco as a risky but legal commodity was noted as an important potential barrier to implementing endgame approaches.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Endgame tobacco control approaches were considered to be viable policy options. Further policy analysis, research and public discussion are needed to develop endgame approaches. A significant change in the public framing of tobacco may be a prerequisite for implementing endgame solutions.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/580 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wilson Nick Thomson George Russell Marie Edwards Richard Gifford Heather |
spellingShingle |
Wilson Nick Thomson George Russell Marie Edwards Richard Gifford Heather Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners BMC Public Health |
author_facet |
Wilson Nick Thomson George Russell Marie Edwards Richard Gifford Heather |
author_sort |
Wilson Nick |
title |
Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners |
title_short |
Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners |
title_full |
Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners |
title_fullStr |
Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed |
Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners |
title_sort |
daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2011-07-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tobacco control strategies have mainly targeted reducing demand. Supply-side focused measures, though less familiar, deserve consideration, particularly to achieve 'endgame' tobacco control aims (e.g. achieving close to zero smoking prevalence). We explored attitudes towards supply-side focused 'endgame' tobacco control approaches and how they can be best communicated with senior policymakers, journalists, and public health practitioners.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We identified five supply-side focused approaches which could potentially lead to the tobacco endgame: two structural models and three discrete actions. The structural models were: (i) a Nicotine Authority to coordinate tobacco control activities and regulate the nicotine/tobacco market for public health aims; and (ii) a Tobacco Supply Agency acting as a monopoly purchaser of tobacco products and controlling the tobacco supply for public health aims. The actions were: (a) allocating progressively reducing tobacco product import quotas (the 'sinking lid') until importation and commercial sale of tobacco products ceased; (b) making tobacco companies responsible for reducing smoking prevalence with stringent financial penalties if targets were missed; and (c) new laws to facilitate litigation against tobacco companies. These approaches were presented as means to achieve a tobacco free New Zealand by 2020 to 19 senior policymakers, journalists, and public health physicians in two focus groups and eight interviews, and their reactions sought.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The tobacco-free vision was widely supported. Participants engaged fully with the proposed tobacco control approaches, which were viewed as interesting or even intriguing. Most supported increasing the focus on supply-side measures. Views differed greatly about the desirability, feasibility and likely effectiveness of each approach. Participants identified a range of potential barriers to implementation and challenges to successfully advocating and communicating these approaches. The current framing of tobacco as a risky but legal commodity was noted as an important potential barrier to implementing endgame approaches.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Endgame tobacco control approaches were considered to be viable policy options. Further policy analysis, research and public discussion are needed to develop endgame approaches. A significant change in the public framing of tobacco may be a prerequisite for implementing endgame solutions.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/580 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wilsonnick daringtodreamreactionstotobaccoendgameideasamongpolicymakersmediaandpublichealthpractitioners AT thomsongeorge daringtodreamreactionstotobaccoendgameideasamongpolicymakersmediaandpublichealthpractitioners AT russellmarie daringtodreamreactionstotobaccoendgameideasamongpolicymakersmediaandpublichealthpractitioners AT edwardsrichard daringtodreamreactionstotobaccoendgameideasamongpolicymakersmediaandpublichealthpractitioners AT giffordheather daringtodreamreactionstotobaccoendgameideasamongpolicymakersmediaandpublichealthpractitioners |
_version_ |
1716792873331982336 |