Evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoring

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since the transfer and application of modern sequencing technologies to the analysis of amplified fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLP), evolutionary biologists have included an increasing number of samples and markers in their studie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerdes Tommy, Ehrich Dorothee, Tuszynski Jarek W, Arrigo Nils, Alvarez Nadir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-01-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/33
id doaj-e08835309a4d481ca3215f6144e587cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e08835309a4d481ca3215f6144e587cf2020-11-25T02:27:12ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052009-01-011013310.1186/1471-2105-10-33Evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoringGerdes TommyEhrich DorotheeTuszynski Jarek WArrigo NilsAlvarez Nadir<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since the transfer and application of modern sequencing technologies to the analysis of amplified fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLP), evolutionary biologists have included an increasing number of samples and markers in their studies. Although justified in this context, the use of automated scoring procedures may result in technical biases that weaken the power and reliability of further analyses.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using a new scoring algorithm, RawGeno, we show that scoring errors – in particular "bin oversplitting" (i.e. when variant sizes of the same AFLP marker are not considered as homologous) and "technical homoplasy" (i.e. when two AFLP markers that differ slightly in size are mistakenly considered as being homologous) – induce a loss of discriminatory power, decrease the robustness of results and, in extreme cases, introduce erroneous information in genetic structure analyses. In the present study, we evaluate several descriptive statistics that can be used to optimize the scoring of the AFLP analysis, and we describe a new statistic, the information content per bin (I<sub>bin</sub>) that represents a valuable estimator during the optimization process. This statistic can be computed at any stage of the AFLP analysis without requiring the inclusion of replicated samples. Finally, we show that downstream analyses are not equally sensitive to scoring errors. Indeed, although a reasonable amount of flexibility is allowed during the optimization of the scoring procedure without causing considerable changes in the detection of genetic structure patterns, notable discrepancies are observed when estimating genetic diversities from differently scored datasets.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our algorithm appears to perform as well as a commercial program in automating AFLP scoring, at least in the context of population genetics or phylogeographic studies. To our knowledge, RawGeno is the only freely available public-domain software for fully automated AFLP scoring, from electropherogram files to user-defined working binary matrices. RawGeno was implemented in an R CRAN package (with an user-friendly GUI) and can be found at <url>http://sourceforge.net/projects/rawgeno</url>.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/33
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerdes Tommy
Ehrich Dorothee
Tuszynski Jarek W
Arrigo Nils
Alvarez Nadir
spellingShingle Gerdes Tommy
Ehrich Dorothee
Tuszynski Jarek W
Arrigo Nils
Alvarez Nadir
Evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoring
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Gerdes Tommy
Ehrich Dorothee
Tuszynski Jarek W
Arrigo Nils
Alvarez Nadir
author_sort Gerdes Tommy
title Evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoring
title_short Evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoring
title_full Evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoring
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoring
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoring
title_sort evaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using rawgeno, an r package for automating aflp scoring
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since the transfer and application of modern sequencing technologies to the analysis of amplified fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLP), evolutionary biologists have included an increasing number of samples and markers in their studies. Although justified in this context, the use of automated scoring procedures may result in technical biases that weaken the power and reliability of further analyses.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using a new scoring algorithm, RawGeno, we show that scoring errors – in particular "bin oversplitting" (i.e. when variant sizes of the same AFLP marker are not considered as homologous) and "technical homoplasy" (i.e. when two AFLP markers that differ slightly in size are mistakenly considered as being homologous) – induce a loss of discriminatory power, decrease the robustness of results and, in extreme cases, introduce erroneous information in genetic structure analyses. In the present study, we evaluate several descriptive statistics that can be used to optimize the scoring of the AFLP analysis, and we describe a new statistic, the information content per bin (I<sub>bin</sub>) that represents a valuable estimator during the optimization process. This statistic can be computed at any stage of the AFLP analysis without requiring the inclusion of replicated samples. Finally, we show that downstream analyses are not equally sensitive to scoring errors. Indeed, although a reasonable amount of flexibility is allowed during the optimization of the scoring procedure without causing considerable changes in the detection of genetic structure patterns, notable discrepancies are observed when estimating genetic diversities from differently scored datasets.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our algorithm appears to perform as well as a commercial program in automating AFLP scoring, at least in the context of population genetics or phylogeographic studies. To our knowledge, RawGeno is the only freely available public-domain software for fully automated AFLP scoring, from electropherogram files to user-defined working binary matrices. RawGeno was implemented in an R CRAN package (with an user-friendly GUI) and can be found at <url>http://sourceforge.net/projects/rawgeno</url>.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/33
work_keys_str_mv AT gerdestommy evaluatingtheimpactofscoringparametersonthestructureofintraspecificgeneticvariationusingrawgenoanrpackageforautomatingaflpscoring
AT ehrichdorothee evaluatingtheimpactofscoringparametersonthestructureofintraspecificgeneticvariationusingrawgenoanrpackageforautomatingaflpscoring
AT tuszynskijarekw evaluatingtheimpactofscoringparametersonthestructureofintraspecificgeneticvariationusingrawgenoanrpackageforautomatingaflpscoring
AT arrigonils evaluatingtheimpactofscoringparametersonthestructureofintraspecificgeneticvariationusingrawgenoanrpackageforautomatingaflpscoring
AT alvareznadir evaluatingtheimpactofscoringparametersonthestructureofintraspecificgeneticvariationusingrawgenoanrpackageforautomatingaflpscoring
_version_ 1724843602712985600