A double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeries

Background: Regional anaesthesia like brachial plexus blocks are increasingly practiced now a day’s for forearm surgery. A major limitation of brachial plexus block which may lead to unplanned general anesthesia is inconsistent block. Conventional nerve localization techniques which rely on surface...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amar Nath Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 2017-03-01
Series:Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/15361
id doaj-e078f9523db44034b294597cd4fdd18d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e078f9523db44034b294597cd4fdd18d2020-11-25T03:25:13ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762017-03-01826975https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v8i2.15361A double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeriesAmar Nath Gupta 0Gouri Devi Institute of Medical Sciences Rajbandh, Durgapur Pin 713212Background: Regional anaesthesia like brachial plexus blocks are increasingly practiced now a day’s for forearm surgery. A major limitation of brachial plexus block which may lead to unplanned general anesthesia is inconsistent block. Conventional nerve localization techniques which rely on surface anatomical landmarks may not provide satisfactory anesthesia. Aims and Objectives: In recent years, real time ultrasound guidance has been introduced as an aid to nerve localization. This study was planned to test the hypothesis that the quality of the axillary brachial plexus blockade guided by ultrasound was better than those using surface anatomical landmarks and produced fewer adverse effects and overall success in cases of forearm surgeries. Materials and Methods: After obtaining institutional ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 100 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II scheduled for forearm surgeries were included in the study and were randomly allocated into two groups. The brachial plexus blockade via axillary approach guided by ultrasound and traditional nerve localization techniques which rely on surface anatomical landmarks, patient report of paresthesia, and/or elicitation of a motor response by mechanical nerve stimulator or electric nerve stimulation with single-injection method was carried out in the two groups of patients respectively. Results: The patients (n=100) predominantly female (55%) with comparable demographic profile found to have statistically insignificant changes in the mean pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate changes and oxygen saturation of hemoglobin during the surgical operations. Overall block success rate, blockade of each individual target nerve was better and procedural hazards were less in the ultrasound guided group. Conclusion: Real time ultra sound guided axillary nerve block is better than traditional palpable method with lesser adverse outcome.https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/15361regional blockaxillary blocksupraclavicular blockupper limb surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amar Nath Gupta
spellingShingle Amar Nath Gupta
A double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeries
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
regional block
axillary block
supraclavicular block
upper limb surgery
author_facet Amar Nath Gupta
author_sort Amar Nath Gupta
title A double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeries
title_short A double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeries
title_full A double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeries
title_fullStr A double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeries
title_full_unstemmed A double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeries
title_sort double blinded randomized study on safety and efficacy between ultra sound guided and palpatory methods of axillary brachial plexus block for forearm surgeries
publisher Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
series Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
issn 2467-9100
2091-0576
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Background: Regional anaesthesia like brachial plexus blocks are increasingly practiced now a day’s for forearm surgery. A major limitation of brachial plexus block which may lead to unplanned general anesthesia is inconsistent block. Conventional nerve localization techniques which rely on surface anatomical landmarks may not provide satisfactory anesthesia. Aims and Objectives: In recent years, real time ultrasound guidance has been introduced as an aid to nerve localization. This study was planned to test the hypothesis that the quality of the axillary brachial plexus blockade guided by ultrasound was better than those using surface anatomical landmarks and produced fewer adverse effects and overall success in cases of forearm surgeries. Materials and Methods: After obtaining institutional ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 100 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II scheduled for forearm surgeries were included in the study and were randomly allocated into two groups. The brachial plexus blockade via axillary approach guided by ultrasound and traditional nerve localization techniques which rely on surface anatomical landmarks, patient report of paresthesia, and/or elicitation of a motor response by mechanical nerve stimulator or electric nerve stimulation with single-injection method was carried out in the two groups of patients respectively. Results: The patients (n=100) predominantly female (55%) with comparable demographic profile found to have statistically insignificant changes in the mean pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate changes and oxygen saturation of hemoglobin during the surgical operations. Overall block success rate, blockade of each individual target nerve was better and procedural hazards were less in the ultrasound guided group. Conclusion: Real time ultra sound guided axillary nerve block is better than traditional palpable method with lesser adverse outcome.
topic regional block
axillary block
supraclavicular block
upper limb surgery
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/15361
work_keys_str_mv AT amarnathgupta adoubleblindedrandomizedstudyonsafetyandefficacybetweenultrasoundguidedandpalpatorymethodsofaxillarybrachialplexusblockforforearmsurgeries
AT amarnathgupta doubleblindedrandomizedstudyonsafetyandefficacybetweenultrasoundguidedandpalpatorymethodsofaxillarybrachialplexusblockforforearmsurgeries
_version_ 1724598259191644160