Varying the Preparation Guide and Group Discussion in a Classroom Analysis of Interteaching

Interteaching is a strategy that shifts the emphasis from passive student learning to active engagement through the use of preparation guides, small group discussions, clarifying lectures, and frequent testing. Several classroom studies have demonstrated that interteaching leads to better student c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine M Gayman, Stephanie T Jimenez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/26120
id doaj-e06f7330c1ec4f08b233d9a911590e98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e06f7330c1ec4f08b233d9a911590e982020-11-25T03:37:16ZengIndiana University Office of Scholarly PublishingJournal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1527-93162020-06-0120210.14434/josotl.v20i2.26120Varying the Preparation Guide and Group Discussion in a Classroom Analysis of InterteachingCatherine M Gayman0Stephanie T Jimenez1Troy UniversityUniversity of Pittsburgh at Johnstown Interteaching is a strategy that shifts the emphasis from passive student learning to active engagement through the use of preparation guides, small group discussions, clarifying lectures, and frequent testing. Several classroom studies have demonstrated that interteaching leads to better student comprehension and higher test scores. However, the specific strategies used in these studies vary slightly. The goal of the present study was to compare two different ways of implementing the preparation guide and group discussions to determine which method led to higher academic success. A group design was used in two sections of a psychology course over two semesters. One section experienced the standard interteaching method, where students completed the entire preparation guide prior to class and engaged in small group discussions during class. The second section was divided into two groups and each group was given half of the preparation guide to complete. Students, then, went through two rounds of group discussions: first, in a dyad with a member that completed the same portion of the preparation guide and then in a larger group with another dyad who completed the other portion of the preparation guide. Students in the second section scored more points on exam questions that came from their half of the preparation guide and they demonstrated less of a preference for interteaching than those who experienced the standard interteaching method. Results from this study indicate that instructors should have students read and complete the entire preparation guide to allow for more effective implementation of interteaching. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/26120interteachingpreparation guidehigher education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Catherine M Gayman
Stephanie T Jimenez
spellingShingle Catherine M Gayman
Stephanie T Jimenez
Varying the Preparation Guide and Group Discussion in a Classroom Analysis of Interteaching
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
interteaching
preparation guide
higher education
author_facet Catherine M Gayman
Stephanie T Jimenez
author_sort Catherine M Gayman
title Varying the Preparation Guide and Group Discussion in a Classroom Analysis of Interteaching
title_short Varying the Preparation Guide and Group Discussion in a Classroom Analysis of Interteaching
title_full Varying the Preparation Guide and Group Discussion in a Classroom Analysis of Interteaching
title_fullStr Varying the Preparation Guide and Group Discussion in a Classroom Analysis of Interteaching
title_full_unstemmed Varying the Preparation Guide and Group Discussion in a Classroom Analysis of Interteaching
title_sort varying the preparation guide and group discussion in a classroom analysis of interteaching
publisher Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing
series Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
issn 1527-9316
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Interteaching is a strategy that shifts the emphasis from passive student learning to active engagement through the use of preparation guides, small group discussions, clarifying lectures, and frequent testing. Several classroom studies have demonstrated that interteaching leads to better student comprehension and higher test scores. However, the specific strategies used in these studies vary slightly. The goal of the present study was to compare two different ways of implementing the preparation guide and group discussions to determine which method led to higher academic success. A group design was used in two sections of a psychology course over two semesters. One section experienced the standard interteaching method, where students completed the entire preparation guide prior to class and engaged in small group discussions during class. The second section was divided into two groups and each group was given half of the preparation guide to complete. Students, then, went through two rounds of group discussions: first, in a dyad with a member that completed the same portion of the preparation guide and then in a larger group with another dyad who completed the other portion of the preparation guide. Students in the second section scored more points on exam questions that came from their half of the preparation guide and they demonstrated less of a preference for interteaching than those who experienced the standard interteaching method. Results from this study indicate that instructors should have students read and complete the entire preparation guide to allow for more effective implementation of interteaching.
topic interteaching
preparation guide
higher education
url https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/26120
work_keys_str_mv AT catherinemgayman varyingthepreparationguideandgroupdiscussioninaclassroomanalysisofinterteaching
AT stephanietjimenez varyingthepreparationguideandgroupdiscussioninaclassroomanalysisofinterteaching
_version_ 1724546158741684224