Comparison of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Scoring Methods in Predicting Resectability and Prognosis in Gynecologic Malignancies

• Main Authors: María Teresa Climent, Anna Serra, Juan Gilabert-Estellés, Juan Gilabert-Aguilar, Antoni Llueca
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
• Series: Journal of Clinical Medicine
• Subjects: laparoscopy; peritoneal carcinomatosis; PCI; Fagotti index; resecability
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/12/2553

Objective: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a disease’s presentation in the advanced stages of many gynecologic tumours. The distribution and volume of the disease are the main factors in achieving complete debulking. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a technique to allow evaluation of the disease. This study’s objective is to compare two laparoscopic scores (Fagotti’s index and Sugarbaker’s peritoneal cancer index (PCI)) and assess the diagnostic accuracy to select patients for neoadjuvant treatment and reduce unnecessary laparotomies. Methods: A non-randomised retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (ovarian and endometrial origin) who underwent laparoscopy and subsequent laparotomy. We evaluated the scores’ ability to predict incomplete surgery and whether they were related to the patients’ prognosis. Results: We included 34 patients, of which 23.5% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The rate of complete cytoreductive surgery was 79.4% (<i>n</i> = 27 patients). The highest sensitivity was obtained with a PCI value greater than 20. It was the best parameter to determine incomplete debulking. Survival curves were analysed according to the “cut off” established for each score, and statically significant differences were found using PCI with respect to Fagotti’s Index. However, these differences were not found with Fagotti’s score. Conclusion: The best diagnostic method to classify patients with peritoneal cancer is the PCI. It could be adapted to each surgical team because it allows identifying the “cut off point”, which depends on incomplete surgery rate.