Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies
Purpose: Periorbital tumor location presents a significant challenge with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation therapy due to high tumor dose needed in the setting of close proximity to orbital structures with lower tolerance. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is felt t...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Particle Therapy Co-operative Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Particle Therapy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://theijpt.org/doi/pdf/10.14338/IJPT-20-00025.1 |
id |
doaj-e05e04bffbb8459a9f6410082e4b77d4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e05e04bffbb8459a9f6410082e4b77d42021-04-05T16:18:46ZengParticle Therapy Co-operative GroupInternational Journal of Particle Therapy2331-51802021-03-0174425110.14338/IJPT-20-00025.12331-5180-7-4-42Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital MalignanciesNicholas J. Damico, MD0Anna K. Wu, BS1Michael Z. Kharouta, MD2Tal Eitan, BA3Rajesh Pidikiti, PhD4Frederick B. Jesseph, MS5Mark Smith, PhD6Christian Langmack, PhD7Diana L. Mattson, CMD8Donald Dobbins, CMD9David B. Mansur, MD10Mitchell X. Machtay, MD11Jennifer A. Dorth, MD12Serah Choi, MD, PhD13Min Yao, MD, PhD14Aashish D. Bhatt, MD15Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USAPurpose: Periorbital tumor location presents a significant challenge with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation therapy due to high tumor dose needed in the setting of close proximity to orbital structures with lower tolerance. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is felt to be an effective modality in such cases due to its sharp dose gradient. Materials and Methods: We reviewed our institutional PBT registry and identified 17 patients with tumor epicenters within 2 cm of the eye and optic apparatus treated with passive scatter PBT with comparison volumetric arc therapy plans available. Maximum and mean doses to organs at risk of interest, including optic nerves, optic chiasm, lens, eye ball, pituitary, cochlea, lacrimal gland, and surrounding brain, were compared using the paired Wilcoxon signed rank test. Overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median age was 67. Median follow-up was 19.7 months. Fourteen patients underwent upfront resection and received postoperative radiation and 3 received definitive radiation. One patient received elective neck radiation, 2 underwent reirradiation, and 3 had concurrent chemotherapy. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean dose to the optic nerves and chiasm, brain, pituitary gland, lacrimal glands, and cochlea as well as in the maximum dose to the optic nerves and chiasm, pituitary gland, lacrimal glands, and cochlea with PBT. The 18-month cumulative incidence of local failure was 19.1% and 1-year overall survival was 80.9%. Conclusion: Proton beam therapy resulted in significant dose reductions to several periorbital and optic structures compared with volumetric arc therapy. Proton beam therapy appears to be the optimal radiation modality in such cases to minimize risk of toxicity to periorbital organs at risk.https://theijpt.org/doi/pdf/10.14338/IJPT-20-00025.1periorbitalprotonopticspituitarycochlea |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nicholas J. Damico, MD Anna K. Wu, BS Michael Z. Kharouta, MD Tal Eitan, BA Rajesh Pidikiti, PhD Frederick B. Jesseph, MS Mark Smith, PhD Christian Langmack, PhD Diana L. Mattson, CMD Donald Dobbins, CMD David B. Mansur, MD Mitchell X. Machtay, MD Jennifer A. Dorth, MD Serah Choi, MD, PhD Min Yao, MD, PhD Aashish D. Bhatt, MD |
spellingShingle |
Nicholas J. Damico, MD Anna K. Wu, BS Michael Z. Kharouta, MD Tal Eitan, BA Rajesh Pidikiti, PhD Frederick B. Jesseph, MS Mark Smith, PhD Christian Langmack, PhD Diana L. Mattson, CMD Donald Dobbins, CMD David B. Mansur, MD Mitchell X. Machtay, MD Jennifer A. Dorth, MD Serah Choi, MD, PhD Min Yao, MD, PhD Aashish D. Bhatt, MD Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies International Journal of Particle Therapy periorbital proton optics pituitary cochlea |
author_facet |
Nicholas J. Damico, MD Anna K. Wu, BS Michael Z. Kharouta, MD Tal Eitan, BA Rajesh Pidikiti, PhD Frederick B. Jesseph, MS Mark Smith, PhD Christian Langmack, PhD Diana L. Mattson, CMD Donald Dobbins, CMD David B. Mansur, MD Mitchell X. Machtay, MD Jennifer A. Dorth, MD Serah Choi, MD, PhD Min Yao, MD, PhD Aashish D. Bhatt, MD |
author_sort |
Nicholas J. Damico, MD |
title |
Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies |
title_short |
Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies |
title_full |
Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies |
title_fullStr |
Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies |
title_sort |
proton beam therapy in the treatment of periorbital malignancies |
publisher |
Particle Therapy Co-operative Group |
series |
International Journal of Particle Therapy |
issn |
2331-5180 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Purpose: Periorbital tumor location presents a significant challenge with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation therapy due to high tumor dose needed in the setting of close proximity to orbital structures with lower tolerance. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is felt to be an effective modality in such cases due to its sharp dose gradient.
Materials and Methods: We reviewed our institutional PBT registry and identified 17 patients with tumor epicenters within 2 cm of the eye and optic apparatus treated with passive scatter PBT with comparison volumetric arc therapy plans available. Maximum and mean doses to organs at risk of interest, including optic nerves, optic chiasm, lens, eye ball, pituitary, cochlea, lacrimal gland, and surrounding brain, were compared using the paired Wilcoxon signed rank test. Overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: Median age was 67. Median follow-up was 19.7 months. Fourteen patients underwent upfront resection and received postoperative radiation and 3 received definitive radiation. One patient received elective neck radiation, 2 underwent reirradiation, and 3 had concurrent chemotherapy. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean dose to the optic nerves and chiasm, brain, pituitary gland, lacrimal glands, and cochlea as well as in the maximum dose to the optic nerves and chiasm, pituitary gland, lacrimal glands, and cochlea with PBT. The 18-month cumulative incidence of local failure was 19.1% and 1-year overall survival was 80.9%.
Conclusion: Proton beam therapy resulted in significant dose reductions to several periorbital and optic structures compared with volumetric arc therapy. Proton beam therapy appears to be the optimal radiation modality in such cases to minimize risk of toxicity to periorbital organs at risk. |
topic |
periorbital proton optics pituitary cochlea |
url |
https://theijpt.org/doi/pdf/10.14338/IJPT-20-00025.1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicholasjdamicomd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT annakwubs protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT michaelzkharoutamd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT taleitanba protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT rajeshpidikitiphd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT frederickbjessephms protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT marksmithphd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT christianlangmackphd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT dianalmattsoncmd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT donalddobbinscmd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT davidbmansurmd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT mitchellxmachtaymd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT jenniferadorthmd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT serahchoimdphd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT minyaomdphd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies AT aashishdbhattmd protonbeamtherapyinthetreatmentofperiorbitalmalignancies |
_version_ |
1721540775021379584 |