Quenching parameter in a holographic thermal QCD

We have calculated the quenching parameter, qˆ in a model-independent way using the gauge–gravity duality. In earlier calculations, the geometry in the gravity side at finite temperature was usually taken as the pure AdS black hole metric for which the dual gauge theory becomes conformally invariant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Binoy Krishna Patra, Bhaskar Arya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-01-01
Series:Nuclear Physics B
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321316303583
id doaj-e03aa595c93544c9bfbe206bbd201d7c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e03aa595c93544c9bfbe206bbd201d7c2020-11-24T23:46:44ZengElsevierNuclear Physics B0550-32131873-15622017-01-01914C40542010.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.11.008Quenching parameter in a holographic thermal QCDBinoy Krishna Patra0Bhaskar Arya1Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, IndiaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, IndiaWe have calculated the quenching parameter, qˆ in a model-independent way using the gauge–gravity duality. In earlier calculations, the geometry in the gravity side at finite temperature was usually taken as the pure AdS black hole metric for which the dual gauge theory becomes conformally invariant unlike QCD. Therefore we use a metric which incorporates the fundamental quarks by embedding the coincident D7 branes in the Klebanov–Tseytlin background and a finite temperature is switched on by inserting a black hole into the background, known as OKS-BH metric. Further inclusion of an additional UV cap to the metric prepares the dual gauge theory to run similar to thermal QCD. Moreover qˆ is usually defined in the literature from the Glauber model perturbative QCD evaluation of the Wilson loop, which has no reasons to hold if the coupling is large and is thus against the main idea of gauge–gravity duality. Thus we use an appropriate definition of qˆ: qˆL−=1/L2, where L is the separation for which the Wilson loop is equal to some specific value. The above two refinements cause qˆ to vary with the temperature as T4 always and to depend linearly on the light-cone time L− with an additional (1/L−) correction term in the short-distance limit whereas in the long-distance limit, qˆ depends only linearly on L− with no correction term. These observations agree with other holographic calculations directly or indirectly.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321316303583
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Binoy Krishna Patra
Bhaskar Arya
spellingShingle Binoy Krishna Patra
Bhaskar Arya
Quenching parameter in a holographic thermal QCD
Nuclear Physics B
author_facet Binoy Krishna Patra
Bhaskar Arya
author_sort Binoy Krishna Patra
title Quenching parameter in a holographic thermal QCD
title_short Quenching parameter in a holographic thermal QCD
title_full Quenching parameter in a holographic thermal QCD
title_fullStr Quenching parameter in a holographic thermal QCD
title_full_unstemmed Quenching parameter in a holographic thermal QCD
title_sort quenching parameter in a holographic thermal qcd
publisher Elsevier
series Nuclear Physics B
issn 0550-3213
1873-1562
publishDate 2017-01-01
description We have calculated the quenching parameter, qˆ in a model-independent way using the gauge–gravity duality. In earlier calculations, the geometry in the gravity side at finite temperature was usually taken as the pure AdS black hole metric for which the dual gauge theory becomes conformally invariant unlike QCD. Therefore we use a metric which incorporates the fundamental quarks by embedding the coincident D7 branes in the Klebanov–Tseytlin background and a finite temperature is switched on by inserting a black hole into the background, known as OKS-BH metric. Further inclusion of an additional UV cap to the metric prepares the dual gauge theory to run similar to thermal QCD. Moreover qˆ is usually defined in the literature from the Glauber model perturbative QCD evaluation of the Wilson loop, which has no reasons to hold if the coupling is large and is thus against the main idea of gauge–gravity duality. Thus we use an appropriate definition of qˆ: qˆL−=1/L2, where L is the separation for which the Wilson loop is equal to some specific value. The above two refinements cause qˆ to vary with the temperature as T4 always and to depend linearly on the light-cone time L− with an additional (1/L−) correction term in the short-distance limit whereas in the long-distance limit, qˆ depends only linearly on L− with no correction term. These observations agree with other holographic calculations directly or indirectly.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321316303583
work_keys_str_mv AT binoykrishnapatra quenchingparameterinaholographicthermalqcd
AT bhaskararya quenchingparameterinaholographicthermalqcd
_version_ 1725492462961557504