Mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de Tours

Two recent archaeological theses have been involved with the understanding of the urban archaeology of Tours and conducted as part of the archaeological research developed over a 40-year period. They particularly cover the analysis of the characteristics and principles of the raising of urban land,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amélie Laurent, Mélanie Fondrillon
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Fédération pour l'Edition de la Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France 2011-01-01
Series:Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/racf/1485
id doaj-e037c065c7bd4942bf9a8e694414f909
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e037c065c7bd4942bf9a8e694414f9092020-11-24T21:34:03ZfraFédération pour l'Edition de la Revue Archéologique du Centre de la FranceRevue Archéologique du Centre de la France0220-66171951-62072011-01-0149Mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de ToursAmélie LaurentMélanie FondrillonTwo recent archaeological theses have been involved with the understanding of the urban archaeology of Tours and conducted as part of the archaeological research developed over a 40-year period. They particularly cover the analysis of the characteristics and principles of the raising of urban land, corresponding to the entire archaeological deposits of a city. These works concerned two complementary scales traditionally employed in urban archaeology: evaluation, on the scale of the city, and characterisation, on the scale of the site. Based on the use of tools from earth science and applied to a problematic city history, two new approaches to pre-industrial city stratigraphy have been developed, the first concerning micro-archaeology, the second, geotechnics applied to the archaeological deposits. Conducted jointly, these two studies are doubly interesting: first, of a general nature, concerning the implementation of a methodology applicable to all urban phenomena, in particular by the creation of a common frame of reference for archaeological stratum, enabling undefined deposits to be described; the second interest, more selective, concerns the application of these general principles to one particular case of urban land formation, that of Tours. The modelling of results to the scale of the city implies that the acquisition of data on the ground incorporates a problematic history and topography.http://journals.openedition.org/racf/1485cityevaluationgeotechnicsmicro-archaeologymodellingstratigraphy
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amélie Laurent
Mélanie Fondrillon
spellingShingle Amélie Laurent
Mélanie Fondrillon
Mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de Tours
Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France
city
evaluation
geotechnics
micro-archaeology
modelling
stratigraphy
author_facet Amélie Laurent
Mélanie Fondrillon
author_sort Amélie Laurent
title Mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de Tours
title_short Mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de Tours
title_full Mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de Tours
title_fullStr Mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de Tours
title_full_unstemmed Mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de Tours
title_sort mesurer la ville par l’évaluation et la caractérisation du sol urbain : l’exemple de tours
publisher Fédération pour l'Edition de la Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France
series Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France
issn 0220-6617
1951-6207
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Two recent archaeological theses have been involved with the understanding of the urban archaeology of Tours and conducted as part of the archaeological research developed over a 40-year period. They particularly cover the analysis of the characteristics and principles of the raising of urban land, corresponding to the entire archaeological deposits of a city. These works concerned two complementary scales traditionally employed in urban archaeology: evaluation, on the scale of the city, and characterisation, on the scale of the site. Based on the use of tools from earth science and applied to a problematic city history, two new approaches to pre-industrial city stratigraphy have been developed, the first concerning micro-archaeology, the second, geotechnics applied to the archaeological deposits. Conducted jointly, these two studies are doubly interesting: first, of a general nature, concerning the implementation of a methodology applicable to all urban phenomena, in particular by the creation of a common frame of reference for archaeological stratum, enabling undefined deposits to be described; the second interest, more selective, concerns the application of these general principles to one particular case of urban land formation, that of Tours. The modelling of results to the scale of the city implies that the acquisition of data on the ground incorporates a problematic history and topography.
topic city
evaluation
geotechnics
micro-archaeology
modelling
stratigraphy
url http://journals.openedition.org/racf/1485
work_keys_str_mv AT amelielaurent mesurerlavilleparlevaluationetlacaracterisationdusolurbainlexempledetours
AT melaniefondrillon mesurerlavilleparlevaluationetlacaracterisationdusolurbainlexempledetours
_version_ 1725950721126301696