Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies (P-FNA) and ultrasound-guided thyroid FNA biopsies (USG-FNA).</p> <p>Methods</p> &...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Can Ahmet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-05-01
Series:BMC Endocrine Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6823/9/14
id doaj-dff78ce202d94fb98b6e2f147c8fa828
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dff78ce202d94fb98b6e2f147c8fa8282020-11-25T01:42:42ZengBMCBMC Endocrine Disorders1472-68232009-05-01911410.1186/1472-6823-9-14Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsiesCan Ahmet<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies (P-FNA) and ultrasound-guided thyroid FNA biopsies (USG-FNA).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Each nodule was considered as a case. Diagnostic steps were history and physical examination, TSH measurement, Tc<sup>99m </sup>thyroid scintigraphy for nodules with a low TSH level, initial P-FNA versus initial USG-FNA, repeat USG-FNA for nodules with initial inadequate P-FNA or USG-FNA, hemithyroidectomy for inadequate repeat USG-FNA. American Thyroid Association thyroid nodule management guidelines were simulated in estimating the cost of P-FNA strategy. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists guidelines were simulated for USG-FNA strategy. Total costs were estimated by adding the cost of each diagnostic step to reach a diagnosis for 100 nodules. Strategy cost was found by dividing the total cost to 100. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the difference between strategy cost of USG-FNA and P-FNA to the difference between accuracy of USG-FNA and P-FNA. A positive ICER indicates more and a negative ICER indicates less expense to achieve one more additional accurate diagnosis of thyroid cancer for USG-FNA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seventy-eight P-FNAs and 190 USG-FNAs were performed between April 2003 and May 2008. There were no differences in age, gender, thyroid function, frequency of multinodular goiter, nodule location and diameter (median nodule diameter: 18.4 mm in P-FNA and 17.0 mm in USG-FNA) between groups. Cytology results in P-FNA versus USG-FNA groups were as follows: benign 49% versus 62% (p = 0.04), inadequate 42% versus 29% (p = 0.03), malignant 3% (p = 1.00) and indeterminate 6% (p = 0.78) for both. Eleven nodules from P-FNA and 18 from USG-FNA group underwent surgery. The accuracy of P-FNA was 0.64 and USG-FNA 0.72. Unit cost of P-FNA was 148 Euros and USG-FNA 226 Euros. The cost of P-FNA strategy was 534 Euros and USG-FNA strategy 523 Euros. Strategy cost includes the expense of repeat USG-FNA for initial inadequate FNAs and surgery for repeat inadequate USG-FNAs. ICER was -138 Euros.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Universal application of USG-FNA for all thyroid nodules is cost-effective and saves 138 Euros per additional accurate diagnosis of benign versus malignant thyroid nodular disease.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00571090</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6823/9/14
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Can Ahmet
spellingShingle Can Ahmet
Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies
BMC Endocrine Disorders
author_facet Can Ahmet
author_sort Can Ahmet
title Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies
title_short Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies
title_full Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies
title_sort cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation- and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies
publisher BMC
series BMC Endocrine Disorders
issn 1472-6823
publishDate 2009-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness comparison between palpation-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies (P-FNA) and ultrasound-guided thyroid FNA biopsies (USG-FNA).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Each nodule was considered as a case. Diagnostic steps were history and physical examination, TSH measurement, Tc<sup>99m </sup>thyroid scintigraphy for nodules with a low TSH level, initial P-FNA versus initial USG-FNA, repeat USG-FNA for nodules with initial inadequate P-FNA or USG-FNA, hemithyroidectomy for inadequate repeat USG-FNA. American Thyroid Association thyroid nodule management guidelines were simulated in estimating the cost of P-FNA strategy. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists guidelines were simulated for USG-FNA strategy. Total costs were estimated by adding the cost of each diagnostic step to reach a diagnosis for 100 nodules. Strategy cost was found by dividing the total cost to 100. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the difference between strategy cost of USG-FNA and P-FNA to the difference between accuracy of USG-FNA and P-FNA. A positive ICER indicates more and a negative ICER indicates less expense to achieve one more additional accurate diagnosis of thyroid cancer for USG-FNA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seventy-eight P-FNAs and 190 USG-FNAs were performed between April 2003 and May 2008. There were no differences in age, gender, thyroid function, frequency of multinodular goiter, nodule location and diameter (median nodule diameter: 18.4 mm in P-FNA and 17.0 mm in USG-FNA) between groups. Cytology results in P-FNA versus USG-FNA groups were as follows: benign 49% versus 62% (p = 0.04), inadequate 42% versus 29% (p = 0.03), malignant 3% (p = 1.00) and indeterminate 6% (p = 0.78) for both. Eleven nodules from P-FNA and 18 from USG-FNA group underwent surgery. The accuracy of P-FNA was 0.64 and USG-FNA 0.72. Unit cost of P-FNA was 148 Euros and USG-FNA 226 Euros. The cost of P-FNA strategy was 534 Euros and USG-FNA strategy 523 Euros. Strategy cost includes the expense of repeat USG-FNA for initial inadequate FNAs and surgery for repeat inadequate USG-FNAs. ICER was -138 Euros.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Universal application of USG-FNA for all thyroid nodules is cost-effective and saves 138 Euros per additional accurate diagnosis of benign versus malignant thyroid nodular disease.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00571090</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6823/9/14
work_keys_str_mv AT canahmet costeffectivenesscomparisonbetweenpalpationandultrasoundguidedthyroidfineneedleaspirationbiopsies
_version_ 1725034778999128064