Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls

Bone adaptation is modulated by the timing, direction, rate and magnitude of mechanical loads. To investigate whether frequent slow, or infrequent fast, gaits could dominate bone adaptation to load, we compared scaling of the limb bones from two mammalian herbivore clades that use radically differen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Doube, Alessandro A. Felder, Melissa Y. Chua, Kalyani Lodhia, Michał M. Kłosowski, John R. Hutchinson, Sandra J. Shefelbine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2018-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180152
id doaj-dff5cc9f1b304027b223be7e0f24928e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dff5cc9f1b304027b223be7e0f24928e2020-11-25T03:56:28ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032018-01-0151010.1098/rsos.180152180152Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactylsMichael DoubeAlessandro A. FelderMelissa Y. ChuaKalyani LodhiaMichał M. KłosowskiJohn R. HutchinsonSandra J. ShefelbineBone adaptation is modulated by the timing, direction, rate and magnitude of mechanical loads. To investigate whether frequent slow, or infrequent fast, gaits could dominate bone adaptation to load, we compared scaling of the limb bones from two mammalian herbivore clades that use radically different high-speed gaits, bipedal hopping (suborder Macropodiformes; kangaroos and kin) and quadrupedal galloping (order Artiodactyla; goats, deer and kin). Forelimb and hindlimb bones were collected from 20 artiodactyl and 15 macropod species (body mass M 1.05–1536 kg) and scanned in computed tomography or X-ray microtomography. Second moment of area (Imax) and bone length (l) were measured. Scaling relations (y = axb) were calculated for l versus M for each bone and for Imax versus M and Imax versus l for every 5% of length. Imax versus M scaling relationships were broadly similar between clades despite the macropod forelimb being nearly unloaded, and the hindlimb highly loaded, during bipedal hopping. Imax versus l and l versus M scaling were related to locomotor and behavioural specializations. Low-intensity loads may be sufficient to maintain bone mass across a wide range of species. Occasional high-intensity gaits might not break through the load sensitivity saturation engendered by frequent low-intensity gaits.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180152boneanatomyscalingbipedal hoppingmacropodiformesartiodactyla
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Doube
Alessandro A. Felder
Melissa Y. Chua
Kalyani Lodhia
Michał M. Kłosowski
John R. Hutchinson
Sandra J. Shefelbine
spellingShingle Michael Doube
Alessandro A. Felder
Melissa Y. Chua
Kalyani Lodhia
Michał M. Kłosowski
John R. Hutchinson
Sandra J. Shefelbine
Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls
Royal Society Open Science
bone
anatomy
scaling
bipedal hopping
macropodiformes
artiodactyla
author_facet Michael Doube
Alessandro A. Felder
Melissa Y. Chua
Kalyani Lodhia
Michał M. Kłosowski
John R. Hutchinson
Sandra J. Shefelbine
author_sort Michael Doube
title Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls
title_short Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls
title_full Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls
title_fullStr Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls
title_full_unstemmed Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls
title_sort limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Bone adaptation is modulated by the timing, direction, rate and magnitude of mechanical loads. To investigate whether frequent slow, or infrequent fast, gaits could dominate bone adaptation to load, we compared scaling of the limb bones from two mammalian herbivore clades that use radically different high-speed gaits, bipedal hopping (suborder Macropodiformes; kangaroos and kin) and quadrupedal galloping (order Artiodactyla; goats, deer and kin). Forelimb and hindlimb bones were collected from 20 artiodactyl and 15 macropod species (body mass M 1.05–1536 kg) and scanned in computed tomography or X-ray microtomography. Second moment of area (Imax) and bone length (l) were measured. Scaling relations (y = axb) were calculated for l versus M for each bone and for Imax versus M and Imax versus l for every 5% of length. Imax versus M scaling relationships were broadly similar between clades despite the macropod forelimb being nearly unloaded, and the hindlimb highly loaded, during bipedal hopping. Imax versus l and l versus M scaling were related to locomotor and behavioural specializations. Low-intensity loads may be sufficient to maintain bone mass across a wide range of species. Occasional high-intensity gaits might not break through the load sensitivity saturation engendered by frequent low-intensity gaits.
topic bone
anatomy
scaling
bipedal hopping
macropodiformes
artiodactyla
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180152
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeldoube limbbonescalinginhoppingmacropodsandquadrupedalartiodactyls
AT alessandroafelder limbbonescalinginhoppingmacropodsandquadrupedalartiodactyls
AT melissaychua limbbonescalinginhoppingmacropodsandquadrupedalartiodactyls
AT kalyanilodhia limbbonescalinginhoppingmacropodsandquadrupedalartiodactyls
AT michałmkłosowski limbbonescalinginhoppingmacropodsandquadrupedalartiodactyls
AT johnrhutchinson limbbonescalinginhoppingmacropodsandquadrupedalartiodactyls
AT sandrajshefelbine limbbonescalinginhoppingmacropodsandquadrupedalartiodactyls
_version_ 1724464892569714688