Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner
Portable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2012-07-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/7/9046 |
id |
doaj-dfd447c350ab4fa58ec9ad3889753c13 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dfd447c350ab4fa58ec9ad3889753c132020-11-24T22:10:24ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202012-07-011279046905410.3390/s120709046Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser ScannerÁngel M. FelicísimoMaría-Eugenia PoloPortable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs an analysis of the uncertainty and repeatability of the NextEngine<sup>TM</sup> portable low-cost 3D laser scanner by scanning an object 20 times in two different resolution modes—Macro and Wide. Some dimensions of the object were measured using a digital calliper, and these results were used as the “true” or control data. In comparing the true and the scanned data, we verified that the mean uncertainty in the Macro Mode is approximately half that of the Wide Mode, at ±0.81 mm and ±1.66 mm, respectively. These experimental results are significantly higher than the accuracy specifications provided by the manufacturer. An analysis of repeatability shows that the successive replicates do not match in the same position. The results are better in Macro Mode than in Wide Mode; it is observed that the repeatability factor is slightly larger than the corresponding mode accuracy, with ±0.84 <em>vs.</em> ±0.81 mm in Macro Mode and ±1.82 <em>vs.</em> ±1.66 mm in Wide Mode. We suggest several improvements, such as adding an external reference scale or providing a calibrated object to allow for a self-calibration operation of the scanner.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/7/9046laser scanninglow-cost scanneruncertaintyrepeatabilityNextEngine |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ángel M. Felicísimo María-Eugenia Polo |
spellingShingle |
Ángel M. Felicísimo María-Eugenia Polo Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner Sensors laser scanning low-cost scanner uncertainty repeatability NextEngine |
author_facet |
Ángel M. Felicísimo María-Eugenia Polo |
author_sort |
Ángel M. Felicísimo |
title |
Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_short |
Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_full |
Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_sort |
analysis of uncertainty and repeatability of a low-cost 3d laser scanner |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2012-07-01 |
description |
Portable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs an analysis of the uncertainty and repeatability of the NextEngine<sup>TM</sup> portable low-cost 3D laser scanner by scanning an object 20 times in two different resolution modes—Macro and Wide. Some dimensions of the object were measured using a digital calliper, and these results were used as the “true” or control data. In comparing the true and the scanned data, we verified that the mean uncertainty in the Macro Mode is approximately half that of the Wide Mode, at ±0.81 mm and ±1.66 mm, respectively. These experimental results are significantly higher than the accuracy specifications provided by the manufacturer. An analysis of repeatability shows that the successive replicates do not match in the same position. The results are better in Macro Mode than in Wide Mode; it is observed that the repeatability factor is slightly larger than the corresponding mode accuracy, with ±0.84 <em>vs.</em> ±0.81 mm in Macro Mode and ±1.82 <em>vs.</em> ±1.66 mm in Wide Mode. We suggest several improvements, such as adding an external reference scale or providing a calibrated object to allow for a self-calibration operation of the scanner. |
topic |
laser scanning low-cost scanner uncertainty repeatability NextEngine |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/7/9046 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT angelmfelicisimo analysisofuncertaintyandrepeatabilityofalowcost3dlaserscanner AT mariaeugeniapolo analysisofuncertaintyandrepeatabilityofalowcost3dlaserscanner |
_version_ |
1725808439945330688 |