Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner

Portable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ángel M. Felicísimo, María-Eugenia Polo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-07-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/7/9046
id doaj-dfd447c350ab4fa58ec9ad3889753c13
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfd447c350ab4fa58ec9ad3889753c132020-11-24T22:10:24ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202012-07-011279046905410.3390/s120709046Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser ScannerÁngel M. FelicísimoMaría-Eugenia PoloPortable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs an analysis of the uncertainty and repeatability of the NextEngine<sup>TM</sup> portable low-cost 3D laser scanner by scanning an object 20 times in two different resolution modes—Macro and Wide. Some dimensions of the object were measured using a digital calliper, and these results were used as the “true” or control data. In comparing the true and the scanned data, we verified that the mean uncertainty in the Macro Mode is approximately half that of the Wide Mode, at ±0.81 mm and ±1.66 mm, respectively. These experimental results are significantly higher than the accuracy specifications provided by the manufacturer. An analysis of repeatability shows that the successive replicates do not match in the same position. The results are better in Macro Mode than in Wide Mode; it is observed that the repeatability factor is slightly larger than the corresponding mode accuracy, with ±0.84 <em>vs.</em> ±0.81 mm in Macro Mode and ±1.82 <em>vs.</em> ±1.66 mm in Wide Mode. We suggest several improvements, such as adding an external reference scale or providing a calibrated object to allow for a self-calibration operation of the scanner.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/7/9046laser scanninglow-cost scanneruncertaintyrepeatabilityNextEngine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ángel M. Felicísimo
María-Eugenia Polo
spellingShingle Ángel M. Felicísimo
María-Eugenia Polo
Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner
Sensors
laser scanning
low-cost scanner
uncertainty
repeatability
NextEngine
author_facet Ángel M. Felicísimo
María-Eugenia Polo
author_sort Ángel M. Felicísimo
title Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner
title_short Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner
title_full Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner
title_fullStr Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner
title_sort analysis of uncertainty and repeatability of a low-cost 3d laser scanner
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2012-07-01
description Portable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs an analysis of the uncertainty and repeatability of the NextEngine<sup>TM</sup> portable low-cost 3D laser scanner by scanning an object 20 times in two different resolution modes—Macro and Wide. Some dimensions of the object were measured using a digital calliper, and these results were used as the “true” or control data. In comparing the true and the scanned data, we verified that the mean uncertainty in the Macro Mode is approximately half that of the Wide Mode, at ±0.81 mm and ±1.66 mm, respectively. These experimental results are significantly higher than the accuracy specifications provided by the manufacturer. An analysis of repeatability shows that the successive replicates do not match in the same position. The results are better in Macro Mode than in Wide Mode; it is observed that the repeatability factor is slightly larger than the corresponding mode accuracy, with ±0.84 <em>vs.</em> ±0.81 mm in Macro Mode and ±1.82 <em>vs.</em> ±1.66 mm in Wide Mode. We suggest several improvements, such as adding an external reference scale or providing a calibrated object to allow for a self-calibration operation of the scanner.
topic laser scanning
low-cost scanner
uncertainty
repeatability
NextEngine
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/7/9046
work_keys_str_mv AT angelmfelicisimo analysisofuncertaintyandrepeatabilityofalowcost3dlaserscanner
AT mariaeugeniapolo analysisofuncertaintyandrepeatabilityofalowcost3dlaserscanner
_version_ 1725808439945330688