The evaluation of teaching in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Studens' point of view

A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was performed among medical and paramedical students. This study was conducted to assess evaluation of teaching quality of teachers from students' point of view, using a questionnaire administered by interviewers to 21171 students randomly selecte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Razavi M, Rabani A, Tavakol M
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 1999-08-01
Series:Tehran University Medical Journal
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/5647.pdf&manuscript_id=5647
id doaj-dfb53123853f4a3fa049b26424f9e291
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfb53123853f4a3fa049b26424f9e2912020-11-24T22:26:26ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesTehran University Medical Journal1683-17641735-73221999-08-015737078The evaluation of teaching in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Studens' point of viewRazavi MRabani ATavakol MA descriptive cross-sectional survey design was performed among medical and paramedical students. This study was conducted to assess evaluation of teaching quality of teachers from students' point of view, using a questionnaire administered by interviewers to 21171 students randomly selected among target population. 650 subjects were recorded during the year 1996-1997. The questionnaire was a 14 item, Likert scale designed to measure teaching quality of teachers. The possible score range on the questionnaire was 14 to 70, so the mean score was 42. The scores equal or more than 42 were suggested as "Good teaching quality" and the scores less than 42 considered as "Poor teaching quality". Findings indicated that the mean score and standard deviation on total faculties were, 54.6 and 12.2 respectively. 79.3% have positive point of view of quality teaching. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the influence of faculties on subjects' scores on the questionnaire. A significant main effect of faculties on mean score (F=44.29: P<0.0001) was notedhttp://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/5647.pdf&manuscript_id=5647
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Razavi M
Rabani A
Tavakol M
spellingShingle Razavi M
Rabani A
Tavakol M
The evaluation of teaching in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Studens' point of view
Tehran University Medical Journal
author_facet Razavi M
Rabani A
Tavakol M
author_sort Razavi M
title The evaluation of teaching in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Studens' point of view
title_short The evaluation of teaching in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Studens' point of view
title_full The evaluation of teaching in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Studens' point of view
title_fullStr The evaluation of teaching in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Studens' point of view
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of teaching in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Studens' point of view
title_sort evaluation of teaching in tehran university of medical sciences and health services: studens' point of view
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Tehran University Medical Journal
issn 1683-1764
1735-7322
publishDate 1999-08-01
description A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was performed among medical and paramedical students. This study was conducted to assess evaluation of teaching quality of teachers from students' point of view, using a questionnaire administered by interviewers to 21171 students randomly selected among target population. 650 subjects were recorded during the year 1996-1997. The questionnaire was a 14 item, Likert scale designed to measure teaching quality of teachers. The possible score range on the questionnaire was 14 to 70, so the mean score was 42. The scores equal or more than 42 were suggested as "Good teaching quality" and the scores less than 42 considered as "Poor teaching quality". Findings indicated that the mean score and standard deviation on total faculties were, 54.6 and 12.2 respectively. 79.3% have positive point of view of quality teaching. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the influence of faculties on subjects' scores on the questionnaire. A significant main effect of faculties on mean score (F=44.29: P<0.0001) was noted
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/5647.pdf&manuscript_id=5647
work_keys_str_mv AT razavim theevaluationofteachingintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencesandhealthservicesstudensapospointofview
AT rabania theevaluationofteachingintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencesandhealthservicesstudensapospointofview
AT tavakolm theevaluationofteachingintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencesandhealthservicesstudensapospointofview
AT razavim evaluationofteachingintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencesandhealthservicesstudensapospointofview
AT rabania evaluationofteachingintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencesandhealthservicesstudensapospointofview
AT tavakolm evaluationofteachingintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencesandhealthservicesstudensapospointofview
_version_ 1725753664900956160