DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF NON-CONTRAST HELICAL CT-SCAN AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN UROLITHIASIS EVALUATION

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of Non Contrast Helical Computed Tomography (NCHCT) scanning as the first choice diagnostic modality for detecting urolithiasis cases in Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya and evaluate the feasibility as alternative to Intravenous Urography (IVU). Material...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fadhli Hasan, Doddy M Soebadi, Sunaryo Hardjowijoto, Mohamad Ayodhia Soebadi, Triyono Karmawan Sukmana Pria, Widodo J Pudjirahardjo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIA 2015-04-01
Series:Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
Online Access:http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/99
id doaj-dfb31aef5af34c43b83068f3d08156ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfb31aef5af34c43b83068f3d08156ca2020-11-25T03:29:27ZengIKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIAJurnal Urologi Indonesia 0853-442X2355-14022015-04-0122110.32421/juri.v22i1.9999DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF NON-CONTRAST HELICAL CT-SCAN AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN UROLITHIASIS EVALUATIONFadhli Hasan0Doddy M Soebadi1Sunaryo Hardjowijoto2Mohamad Ayodhia Soebadi3Triyono Karmawan Sukmana Pria4Widodo J Pudjirahardjo5Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University, Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University, Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University, Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University, Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya.Departmentof Radiology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University, Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya.Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya.Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of Non Contrast Helical Computed Tomography (NCHCT) scanning as the first choice diagnostic modality for detecting urolithiasis cases in Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya and evaluate the feasibility as alternative to Intravenous Urography (IVU). Material & Methods: Seventeen patients with clinical manifestation of suspected urolithiasis underwent NCHCT and IVU to evaluate suspected urolithiasis. Reformatted three-dimensional CT was performed in all patients. The images were correlated with findings from surgical procedure (ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and open surgery). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were determined for NCHCT and IVU. Results: The diagnosis of urolithiasis was defined as unequivocal evidence of urolithiasis on either NCHCT or IVU. Sixteen of seventeen patients evaluated were diagnosed with urolithiasis. NCHCT established the diagnosis in 16 of 17 patients while IVU was positive in 11 of 17 patients. IVU was negative in 6 of the 17 cases. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of NCHCT was 100%, 100%, and 100% respectively (p = 0.05) and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of IVU was 68%, 100% and 70% respectively (p = 0.35). There was no statistically significant difference between IVU and NCHCT using Fisher’s exact test. Conclusions: NCHCT accurately diagnosed urolithiasis in patients with suspected urolithiasis. Considering that NCHCT is more effective and efficient than IVU as diagnostic modality in determining the presence of urolithiasis, it may be considered to replace IVU as the first line diagnostic tool for urolithiasis in Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya. Keywords: Non Contrast Helical CT Scan, Intravenous Urography, Urolithiasis.http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/99
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fadhli Hasan
Doddy M Soebadi
Sunaryo Hardjowijoto
Mohamad Ayodhia Soebadi
Triyono Karmawan Sukmana Pria
Widodo J Pudjirahardjo
spellingShingle Fadhli Hasan
Doddy M Soebadi
Sunaryo Hardjowijoto
Mohamad Ayodhia Soebadi
Triyono Karmawan Sukmana Pria
Widodo J Pudjirahardjo
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF NON-CONTRAST HELICAL CT-SCAN AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN UROLITHIASIS EVALUATION
Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
author_facet Fadhli Hasan
Doddy M Soebadi
Sunaryo Hardjowijoto
Mohamad Ayodhia Soebadi
Triyono Karmawan Sukmana Pria
Widodo J Pudjirahardjo
author_sort Fadhli Hasan
title DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF NON-CONTRAST HELICAL CT-SCAN AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN UROLITHIASIS EVALUATION
title_short DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF NON-CONTRAST HELICAL CT-SCAN AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN UROLITHIASIS EVALUATION
title_full DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF NON-CONTRAST HELICAL CT-SCAN AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN UROLITHIASIS EVALUATION
title_fullStr DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF NON-CONTRAST HELICAL CT-SCAN AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN UROLITHIASIS EVALUATION
title_full_unstemmed DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF NON-CONTRAST HELICAL CT-SCAN AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN UROLITHIASIS EVALUATION
title_sort diagnostic value of non-contrast helical ct-scan and intravenous urography in urolithiasis evaluation
publisher IKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIA
series Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
issn 0853-442X
2355-1402
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of Non Contrast Helical Computed Tomography (NCHCT) scanning as the first choice diagnostic modality for detecting urolithiasis cases in Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya and evaluate the feasibility as alternative to Intravenous Urography (IVU). Material & Methods: Seventeen patients with clinical manifestation of suspected urolithiasis underwent NCHCT and IVU to evaluate suspected urolithiasis. Reformatted three-dimensional CT was performed in all patients. The images were correlated with findings from surgical procedure (ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and open surgery). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were determined for NCHCT and IVU. Results: The diagnosis of urolithiasis was defined as unequivocal evidence of urolithiasis on either NCHCT or IVU. Sixteen of seventeen patients evaluated were diagnosed with urolithiasis. NCHCT established the diagnosis in 16 of 17 patients while IVU was positive in 11 of 17 patients. IVU was negative in 6 of the 17 cases. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of NCHCT was 100%, 100%, and 100% respectively (p = 0.05) and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of IVU was 68%, 100% and 70% respectively (p = 0.35). There was no statistically significant difference between IVU and NCHCT using Fisher’s exact test. Conclusions: NCHCT accurately diagnosed urolithiasis in patients with suspected urolithiasis. Considering that NCHCT is more effective and efficient than IVU as diagnostic modality in determining the presence of urolithiasis, it may be considered to replace IVU as the first line diagnostic tool for urolithiasis in Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya. Keywords: Non Contrast Helical CT Scan, Intravenous Urography, Urolithiasis.
url http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/99
work_keys_str_mv AT fadhlihasan diagnosticvalueofnoncontrasthelicalctscanandintravenousurographyinurolithiasisevaluation
AT doddymsoebadi diagnosticvalueofnoncontrasthelicalctscanandintravenousurographyinurolithiasisevaluation
AT sunaryohardjowijoto diagnosticvalueofnoncontrasthelicalctscanandintravenousurographyinurolithiasisevaluation
AT mohamadayodhiasoebadi diagnosticvalueofnoncontrasthelicalctscanandintravenousurographyinurolithiasisevaluation
AT triyonokarmawansukmanapria diagnosticvalueofnoncontrasthelicalctscanandintravenousurographyinurolithiasisevaluation
AT widodojpudjirahardjo diagnosticvalueofnoncontrasthelicalctscanandintravenousurographyinurolithiasisevaluation
_version_ 1724579165897752576