Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: There is limited evidence that removal of syndesmotic implants is beneficial. Despite this, many surgeons advocate removal based on previous studies suggesting improved ankle dorsiflexion. Methodologic difficulties make the validity and applicability of previous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Y. Kwon MD, Timilien Wusu MD, Jorge Briceno MD, Philip Kaiser MD, Patrick Cronin MD, Alyssa Leblanc NP, Brian Velasco BA, Christopher Miller MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-10-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00262
id doaj-dfac6b90780d465eb150c7021ff7b5ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfac6b90780d465eb150c7021ff7b5ce2020-11-25T02:50:28ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142019-10-01410.1177/2473011419S00262Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?John Y. Kwon MDTimilien Wusu MDJorge Briceno MDPhilip Kaiser MDPatrick Cronin MDAlyssa Leblanc NPBrian Velasco BAChristopher Miller MDCategory: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: There is limited evidence that removal of syndesmotic implants is beneficial. Despite this, many surgeons advocate removal based on previous studies suggesting improved ankle dorsiflexion. Methodologic difficulties make the validity and applicability of previous works questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ankle dorsiflexion after syndesmotic implant removal using radiographic measurements of ankle dorsiflexion before and after screw removal utilizing a standardized, applied load. Methods: All patients undergoing isolated syndesmotic implant removal were consented for participation. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured radiographically at three different time points: (I) immediately before implant removal intraoperatively, (II) immediately after implant removal intraoperatively and (III) approximately three months after implant removal. A standardized dorsiflexion torque force of 33.4 newton-meter (Nm) was applied to the ankle by a research assistant using a tensiometer at these time points and a perfect lateral radiograph of the ankle was obtained. Four reviewers independently measured ankle dorsiflexion on randomized, deidentified and blinded images using a digital measurement tool. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. Paired T-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used for continuous variables. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated using a 2-way random effects model and the absolute agreement definition. Results: 29 patients met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. There were 11 men (38%) and 18 women (62%). The mean, and standard deviation, age was 50.3 ± 16.9 years (range 19-80). The mean ankle dorsiflexion pre-operatively, post-op and at 3 month follow up was 13.7°± 6.6°, 13.3°±7.3° and 11.8°±11.3°, respectively (p=0.466). For subsequent analysis, 5 patients were excluded due to potential cofounding effect of retained suture button devices. Analysis of the remaining 24 patients demonstrated similar results with no statistically significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion at all three time points. Conclusion: Removal of syndesmotic screws does not improve ankle dorsiflexion motion and should not be used as an indication for screw removal.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00262
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Y. Kwon MD
Timilien Wusu MD
Jorge Briceno MD
Philip Kaiser MD
Patrick Cronin MD
Alyssa Leblanc NP
Brian Velasco BA
Christopher Miller MD
spellingShingle John Y. Kwon MD
Timilien Wusu MD
Jorge Briceno MD
Philip Kaiser MD
Patrick Cronin MD
Alyssa Leblanc NP
Brian Velasco BA
Christopher Miller MD
Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
author_facet John Y. Kwon MD
Timilien Wusu MD
Jorge Briceno MD
Philip Kaiser MD
Patrick Cronin MD
Alyssa Leblanc NP
Brian Velasco BA
Christopher Miller MD
author_sort John Y. Kwon MD
title Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?
title_short Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?
title_full Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?
title_fullStr Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?
title_full_unstemmed Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?
title_sort syndesmotic implant removal: does it really improve ankle dorsiflexion range of motion?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
issn 2473-0114
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: There is limited evidence that removal of syndesmotic implants is beneficial. Despite this, many surgeons advocate removal based on previous studies suggesting improved ankle dorsiflexion. Methodologic difficulties make the validity and applicability of previous works questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ankle dorsiflexion after syndesmotic implant removal using radiographic measurements of ankle dorsiflexion before and after screw removal utilizing a standardized, applied load. Methods: All patients undergoing isolated syndesmotic implant removal were consented for participation. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured radiographically at three different time points: (I) immediately before implant removal intraoperatively, (II) immediately after implant removal intraoperatively and (III) approximately three months after implant removal. A standardized dorsiflexion torque force of 33.4 newton-meter (Nm) was applied to the ankle by a research assistant using a tensiometer at these time points and a perfect lateral radiograph of the ankle was obtained. Four reviewers independently measured ankle dorsiflexion on randomized, deidentified and blinded images using a digital measurement tool. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. Paired T-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used for continuous variables. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated using a 2-way random effects model and the absolute agreement definition. Results: 29 patients met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. There were 11 men (38%) and 18 women (62%). The mean, and standard deviation, age was 50.3 ± 16.9 years (range 19-80). The mean ankle dorsiflexion pre-operatively, post-op and at 3 month follow up was 13.7°± 6.6°, 13.3°±7.3° and 11.8°±11.3°, respectively (p=0.466). For subsequent analysis, 5 patients were excluded due to potential cofounding effect of retained suture button devices. Analysis of the remaining 24 patients demonstrated similar results with no statistically significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion at all three time points. Conclusion: Removal of syndesmotic screws does not improve ankle dorsiflexion motion and should not be used as an indication for screw removal.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00262
work_keys_str_mv AT johnykwonmd syndesmoticimplantremovaldoesitreallyimproveankledorsiflexionrangeofmotion
AT timilienwusumd syndesmoticimplantremovaldoesitreallyimproveankledorsiflexionrangeofmotion
AT jorgebricenomd syndesmoticimplantremovaldoesitreallyimproveankledorsiflexionrangeofmotion
AT philipkaisermd syndesmoticimplantremovaldoesitreallyimproveankledorsiflexionrangeofmotion
AT patrickcroninmd syndesmoticimplantremovaldoesitreallyimproveankledorsiflexionrangeofmotion
AT alyssaleblancnp syndesmoticimplantremovaldoesitreallyimproveankledorsiflexionrangeofmotion
AT brianvelascoba syndesmoticimplantremovaldoesitreallyimproveankledorsiflexionrangeofmotion
AT christophermillermd syndesmoticimplantremovaldoesitreallyimproveankledorsiflexionrangeofmotion
_version_ 1724738298634567680